User talk:MarcoSaarela

Speedy deletion of NASA Ames Director's Discretionary Fund
A tag has been placed on NASA Ames Director's Discretionary Fund, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Cactus Writer 18:56, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Vision for Space Exploration
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. E_dog95'  Hi ' 19:05, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Optical communication
Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. E_dog95'  Hi ' 19:09, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

NASA
Your recent text dump in NASA was unhelpful and has been undone. Continued edits such as these will treated as vandalism. Fnlayson (talk) 20:35, 24 June 2008 (UTC)