User talk:Marco Chemello (WMIT)

Re orphan article
Hello Marco, Just added a link from the page Business model to this new one. Also did the same in the Portuguese version. Best regards, Luis


 * Dear, t.hank you. Please remember to add your signature to your messages (see Signatures). --Marco Chemello (WMIT) (talk) 14:30, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nicolò Tron (diplomat), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Nicol%C3%B2_Tron_%28diplomat%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Nicol%C3%B2_Tron_%28diplomat%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Ciao
test many thanks --CPadovani (talk) 13:19, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Typo?
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/84462604.pdf states that File:Collina presso Nagasaki, bozzetto di Alexandre Bailly, Michel Jambon per Madama Butterfly (1906) - Archivio Storico Ricordi ICON000079.jpg  is by Marcel Jambon, not Michel Jambon as the file upload states. Is this a typo in the archive? Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.5% of all FPs 20:32, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Anyway, as you may have seen on WT:OPERA, I'm at four restorations from the drop, which I don't think is bad after three days. Threw Puccini and Rosa Raisa up on FPC. Want to wait on Madama Butterfly until the above's resolved, and I'm waiting for Gabrielle Ray to be in the article a little longer. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.5% of all FPs 06:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you! I informed the Archivio Ricordi staff about your work - they are grateful and they are verifying the information about Jambon. --Marco Chemello (WMIT) (talk) 08:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the tip, I just corrected the typo. --LutiV (talk) 09:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ Fixed metadata on Commons and renamed files. --Marco Chemello (WMIT) (talk) 09:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Glad I could help! Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.5% of all FPs 23:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Been doing a second pass over the images, and have a few comments, if you don't mind.

First off, Documentation: It'll help usage if we can be as sure of what we have as possible.
 * It'd be really helpful in some cases to state composer as well as opera. Take File:Orfeo (mezzosoprano), figurino di Alfredo Edel per Orphée et Eurydice (1889) - Archivio Storico Ricordi ICON004459.jpg - Orphée et Eurydice is one of those titles that really isn't as distinct as it should be. File:Il castello di Re Arturo, bozzetto di Anton Brioschi per Merlin (1886) - Archivio Storico Ricordi ICON004203.jpg is possibly worse, as the only opera I can find for the right timeframe of that name is Goldmark's, but Brioschi isn't credited in the program for the première, which was late in 1886. Now, obviously, it's possible that an Italian production was in the works in production soon after the German one, and that's what it's for, but where is very hard to say, and it's always possible there's another Merlin out there that I don't know about.
 * The archive sometimes uses Italian names for non-Italian operas. File:L'atrio della reggia dei Gibicungi, bozzetto di artista ignoto per Il crepuscolo degli dei (1896) - Archivio Storico Ricordi ICON009442.jpg appears to be Gotterdammerung, for instance. It'd be good to note the standard name in parentheses.
 * Places of performance can also be helpful. For example, with File:La stazione, bozzetto di Vittorio Rota per Risurrezione (1906) - Archivio Storico Ricordi ICON002178.jpg it's said it's from 1906, so it can't be from the 1904 première, but it's hard to say anything more without substantially more research.

Secondly, on a different topic, File:Walküre (Waltraute) (mezosoprano), figurino di Carl Emil Doepler per Die Walküre (1876) - Archivio Storico Ricordi ICON003994.jpg. I believe this is from a book of Doepler's designs. If you can get me the complete set, I will promise you to restore every single one. It's a project I've wanted to do for a while, but a bunch of the files cut off the edges of the artwork - I remember the one for the dwarves was rather bad in that respect.

Thirdly, and this is probably more of a "me" problem - I've promised myself to do at least 50% female-related restorations. This does not include fictional women, but can include costume designs for named actresses, or anything designed by a woman. If you have anyhthing like that, it would be appreciated.

Fourthly, File:M.elle_Fonti,_figurino_di_artista_ignoto_per_La_revanche_de_Candaule_(s.d.)_-_Archivio_Storico_Ricordi_ICON013578.jpg is probably from about 1869. Fonti was in the première cast, and the première was in 1869. I don't... think it was revived. The quote about it at Jean-Jacques-Joseph Debillemont does not bode well for revivals. Kind of looks like there's significant amount of the edge of the image cut off in that one as well, since there's a bit of edge sticking in at the lower left. If you're doing the scanning anew, it's probably best to include more edge - easier to crop than rescan.

Thanks, and sorry for all my rambling! Honestly, this is an amazing image drop, and please don't take my nitpicks as anything more than that. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.5% of all FPs 06:32, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Perhaps of more interest than my rambling: It looks like, at the moment, Rosa Raisa, Madama Butterfly, and maybe Puccini (it hasn't hit quorum yet) will become featured pictures tomorrow, which is a good start, no? Couple more up for voting, but think we're hitting the traditional start of University slowdown. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.5% of all FPs 06:12, 30 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Great! Thank you again. --Marco Chemello (WMIT) (talk) 06:59, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Looks like, of the six I've done so far, two (Puccini, Rosa Raisa) have passed, two more (Madama Butterfly and Gabrielle Ray are passing, and another two have just been nominated. I'm thinking that big group photo of Verdi next, and I think I might nominate Edgar without changes, because there really is nothing for me to do with that one. The order of completion and order of nomination is going to vary a little bit for various reasons (big one being if it's already in the article, so I don't have to wait for usage to stabilise). I'll keep it updated on WT:OPERA. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.5% of all FPs 21:43, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh, one question, although I don't know how answerable it is: is this from La Wallys première production, or a later one? If we know the production, that tells us which actress it was designed for, which adds some value. Adam Cuerden' (talk)Has about 7.5% of all FPs 21:48, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 1892 is the year of debut for La Wally, so it's the première production. --Marco Chemello (WMIT) (talk) 12:22, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Right! Wasn't sure if there was enough time for a second to be mounted that year. Cheers! Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.6% of all FPs 18:26, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Oh, one last thing. Licensing. I think the license should be - that's what I've been using for my restorations; it displays (more-or-less; Commons' version looks a little different) as:

Otherwise you get this:

Which doesn't really indicate who to credit, and it's not entirely obvious if you don't know about the collaboration. Easy enough fixed, but worth noting before the next drop. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.6% of all FPs 20:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)


 * You are right, I'll apply your suggestion. Thank you. --Marco Chemello (WMIT) (talk) 10:32, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Glad to help! I really hope I'm not being a pain. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.6% of all FPs 09:54, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

What is the button to save drafts in my sandbox?
Good evening Marco, I don't know if I published by mistake what I had written in my sand box last thursday during the English class. I have a doubt about the right button I have to use to save the contents of my sandbox without publishing it in the community. You said not to use the blue buttons ... but I had already pressed the blu button on the top (on the right). In that page there are 2 blu buttons, are both wrong? (I tried to attach an image but it's quite difficult. The system blocks me) Please, could you check my sandbox and... finally what is the right botton to press when you want just to save the your draft in the sandbox? Thanks a lot.

--Pantone23 (talk)


 * Dear Pantone23, as I specified the only button not to press is "Submit your draft for review!". The other button, "Publish", means simply to save in your sandbox. Good work. --Marco Chemello (WMIT) (talk) 19:21, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sabrina Fernandes (July 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sabrina Fernandes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sabrina Fernandes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sabrina_Fernandes Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MurielMary&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sabrina_Fernandes reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 13:08, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello
Ciao Jaqen (talk) 10:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)