User talk:Marcus2023/Clayton Christensen

Peer Review
Hi Marcus2023! I just finished a peer review of your sandbox/article changes. I made the peer review page, but thought I would also post it here:

The Lead of the article starts with a concise first sentence that explains who Clayton Christensen is and what he is most known for. The Lead describes some of Christensen's main accomplishments, and is not overly detailed.

The content that was added was definitely relevant to Christensen's life, and I especially liked the additions to the Personal Life section. It gives a more well-rounded summary of Christensen's life. I am not sure if this counts as an equity gap, but the article does speak often about the LDS Church and Christensen's involvement in it.

The tone of this article is very neutral. There are no points in the article that the author tries to sway readers to one side or another, and there is no instances of bias.

The links to the sources do work, and they contain some good content. Most of the sources seem reliable, however I did find one that was a blog. Although, it did have a very neutral tone.

The organization is great. The categories follow the typical order for a Wikipedia Biography, and the order makes sense. I also did not see any grammatical or spelling errors.

There is a great quality picture of Christensen at the top of the article.

Overall, I would say this article was done well. Airplane Rat (talk) 06:30, 20 November 2023 (UTC)