User talk:Marcusbleasdale

Editing the article about yourself
There are two possibilities: you are Marcus Bleasdale or you aren't him. I'm guessing that you are him. (If you aren't him, then your choice of user ID is misleading. Please stop using this ID and use another instead.) If you are indeed him, please read Conflict of interest. This is dismayingly long; but it's well written and I think it's a lot easier to find the bits within it that are relevant to you, and to read and digest these, than you might guess at first glance.

In short, feel free to make suggestions on Talk:Marcus Bleasdale (the article's "talk page"). Then it's likely that somebody will notice these and act upon them. If nobody does, then feel free to leave a note on my own "user talk" page nudging me to go to the article's talk page and take a look at what you've suggested there.

I'm sorry that all of this is very ponderous and that only a small percentage of photographers meriting good articles actually get them. Just hang around another century or so and we might be doing significantly better ... perhaps. (In the meantime, you'd be most welcome to try your hand at improving articles about others. Just the occasional correction or amplification would be much appreciated.) -- Hoary (talk) 05:52, 9 November 2018 (UTC)


 * talk:Hoary Thank you for the pointers. I was unaware, but I think only added citation where needed and removed the word recently. Let me know if there is a better way to do it in the future. I will also take up your suggestions on editing. Bests. 62.92.77.168 (talk) 08:28, 9 November 2018 (UTC) marcusbleasdale


 * Thank you for your non-irate response! Please do make those suggestions at Talk:Marcus Bleasdale. (Preferably after logging in as "Marcusbleasdale". Wikipedia has an option when you log in: "Keep me logged in" or similar. I use that and only have to consciously log in once every few months.) There are personal reasons why I can't do much editing till June or thereabouts, but I hope that you'll be able to get a good article one (approved) way or another. -- Hoary (talk) 05:33, 10 November 2018 (UTC)