User talk:Marcusfuchs

Welcome!
Hello, Marcusfuchs, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Marcusfuchs/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content protocols, and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * How to write a great article
 * The perfect article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! GPL93 (talk) 17:11, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Marcusfuchs/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Marcusfuchs/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. GPL93 (talk) 17:11, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

My first post
I didn't know you could not give a history on a company as a publisher. Pity as I had wanted to help the owner as they have many people asking on amazon seller account. Well look at suggestions on the private email. Marcusfuchs (talk) 17:28, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the wizard. I'll.go through it and see if I can post a basic synopsis of the firm without violating the policies. We create a reference so people can find the legal and commercial aspects for the business.the goal is to allow people to research the firm objectively. Thank you Marcusfuchs (talk) 18:14, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Are you connected to Naked Activities in some way? GeneralNotability (talk) 18:41, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Yes. I am closely linked with the owners of the firm. Trying to help them get some external recognition for the company as they are on 9 different sites and sales channels. We've done blogs trying to explain them but felt a reference link to wiki would be best way to summarize it all. Marcusfuchs (talk) 19:11, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
 * In that case, you have a conflict of interest and will need to declare it. Please note that Wikipedia is not ocial media, a business directory, or an extension of a company's web presence. You and the company will not control the article on the company. If you genuinely think that the company meets our corporate notability guidelines, you may try again, but it will need to be based on what high-quality reliable, independent sources say about the company, not based on what the company says about itself. GeneralNotability (talk) 12:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)