User talk:Marcuswa123

Welcome
Hello, Marcuswa123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 7 06:22, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. 7 06:23, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at James With. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: James With was changed by Marcuswa123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.836972 on 2010-11-24T08:43:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:43, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 7 08:48, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 7 01:08, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Yes, you are blocked for adding information that would reflect badly on a living person without citing any sources, and for continuing to do so after being repeatedly asked to provide such sources. If reliable independent published sources do exist, you may link to some of them here, to assist other admins in determining whether you should be unblocked or not. I am slightly puzzled regarding why, if you have sources, you didn't cite them after repeated warnings that you would be blocked if you didn't. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:37, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi FisherQueen. Your insistance that sources needed to be repeatedly provided has only come to light in your above comment. The 'previous warnings' were not seen. Apologies. Published sources of the edited text may not exist as of yet, although they will be tracked. However, court cases and numbers, statements, documentation, etc are at hand. Would you like them to be provided?}}
 * No need for a second unblock request; the first one is still open. Court documents are primary sources; what Wikipedia uses are secondary sources like newspaper articles or trade journals.  If this is important enough to be part of an encyclopedia article, then it was certainly reported upon in the papers. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:01, 25 November 2010 (UTC)