User talk:Mare96

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/95.180.18.56 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. -- WhiteWriter speaks 18:31, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Question
Is there a reason why you keep on changing figures in articles, which were several times checked on official websites or census? If there is, tell it now; otherwise, stop doing that. We have more important stuff to do, than to watch you and fix after you.

Since you apparently do not understand English, I'll try Serbian:

Ima li neki razlog zašto menjaš brojke na člancima, koje su više puta proverene na zvaničnim sajtovima ili popisu? Ako ima, kaži ga sad ili prestani to da radiš. Ovde imamo pametnija posla nego da stalno popravljamo za tobom.

No such user (talk) 06:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Jebi se bre jebala te wikipedia! Pisacu sta ja hocu!

May 2011
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Belgrade. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. See WP:SOURCE and WP:BURDEN. Bento00 (talk) 16:04, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Belgrade. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bento00 (talk) 16:19, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 16:49, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 17:06, 17 May 2011 (UTC)