User talk:Margraf

Please try to keep a Neutral Point of View when editing Wikipedia. Not all Wikipedians are Christians, and the bible is not considered to be a true story by everyone. Klosterdev 19:34, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm a little puzzled as to what, exactly, there was that suggested such an idea. I don't consider the Bible an entirely true story myself. I also think a complete revert was unwarranted, as I believe I did fix many legitimate problems with the original article. There seemed to be a lot of speculation on the part of the article writer, focusing on minor details in the descriptions of the characters, and making his own judgements on them. Not to mention the trivial spelling errors and the like that I fixed. At any rate, I believe my lack of NPOV was due to misunderstanding, and I'd like to hear some examples as to what suggested it lacked NPOV, so next time I can fix the problems in the article without creating new ones. I looked over it a little... was it the "true story of the Bible" thing? That was my bad, I don't think I properly got across what I was getting at there. I didn't mean to say that the Bible was to be accepted as true, I just wanted to make it clear that Lucas and Cannan are not, and do not even say they are, simply retelling the stories of the Bible in a modern form - they do deviate from the Bible at times, and jokingly claim as part of the premise that it is the "true" story of the events. I'll try and clarify that part. Margraf 01:45, 5 November 2006 (UTC)