User talk:Maria567

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Maria567/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Maria567/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and save.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Maria567/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Whispering&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Maria567/sandbox reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Whispe ring  21:41, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

My talk page
Hello Maria567,

I noticed that you left a comment on my talk page and later deleted it for some reason. You left the header "I Have Been Refused the Right to Post on Wikipedia". Let's be clear: You have no right to post anything you want on Wikipedia. No one does. This is a private website with clearly defined policies and guidelines, and you have no free speech rights here. You are welcome to write articles that fully comply with our policies and guidelines. You are not allowed to add something to the encyclopedia that obviously does not comply, even for a few days. Your comment referred to "people talking badly about your site saying that everything on here is a pack of lies." If that was the widespread view of Wikipedia, then we would not have moved up last year from the #6 website to the #5 website in the world in terms of usage, according to Alexa. And we are far and away the #1 website in the world in terms of originally written content. I am personally sympathetic to your efforts to get an education in IT. But as a Wikipedia administrator, it is my responsibility to help ensure that our encyclopedia articles comply with our policies and guidelines. So, I suggest that you reconsider your approach. You can become a productive editor here and develop your IT skills on the world's #5 website. Or you can quit. The choice is yours. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  03:20, 19 January 2018 (UTC)