User talk:MariaOlteanu

Welcome!
Hello, MariaOlteanu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RFD (talk) 23:12, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:John Florescu-TV show.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:John Florescu-TV show.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:51, 24 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi MariaOlteanu. The source link you've provided for the above image does not show that any licensing information so it cannot be verified to have been released into the public domain. It also seems that Media Expres S.R.L. is claiming it holds the copyright on the found on its website. Can you provide any further information on why you feel this file is in the public domain and a another link where this can be verified? If not, then please ask the original copyright holder of the image to send a declaration of consent to Wikipedia OTRS for license verification purposes. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:01, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

RE: Hi Marchjuly Thank you for sending this notification, so I have the chance to correct the link. It is stated on the online publication website, belonging to Media Expres S.R.L., that they are under the PUBLIC DOMAIN DEDICATION. The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of his or her rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law (more info here https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). One can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. Moreover, on the same page, the Editor in Chief, Mihai-Marian Pavelescu to the extent possible under law, has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this page. -- User:MariaOlteanu (talk) 01:01, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * That may be the case for the content generated by the website itself, but it's not clear whether the photo came from another source. Typically, the copyright for any photo belongs to the person taking the photo unless there has been some kind of official copyright transfer agreement. Can you provide information which shows that this particular photo was taken by Mihai-Marian Pavelescu or that she holds the copyright on it? Lots of websites are able to use photos taken by other individuals based upon the concept of fair use], but the copyright is still held by the original photographer. Moreover, the website is still listed as being under copyright protection despite the declaration of public domain, so they seem to be contradicting themselves. I'll ask about this at WP:MCQ to see what others think. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:17, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

RE: Hi Marchjuly I sent a request for this specific image for the online publication website, belonging to Media Expres S.R.L., to release a communication verifying that the image can be used here. Can you allow a response time for this? Thank you for having a look into this. User:MariaOlteanu


 * Only the original copyright holder of the image can agree to release the license under a free license. If the copyright holder is Media Expres, then they need to send a explicit declaration of consent to Wikipedia OTRS for verification. Once they send in the email, a Template:OTRS pending can be added to the file's page which will give an additional 30 days for the file's licensing to be verified. You need to make sure that they understand that a free license means that they agree to give permission to anyone anywhere in the world to download the photo and use it for any purpose, including commercial. They cannot just agree to allow the photo to be used on Wikipedia. You also need to make sure that they understand that they cannot claim ownership over someone else photo. If you have any more questions, you should ask them at WP:MCQ so that other editors can also help you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:20, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Florescu


A tag has been placed on John Florescu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. red dogsix (talk) 04:33, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at WP:MCQ
You are invited to join the discussion at. Marchjuly (talk) 09:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC) -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC)