User talk:Maria Rabinovich

September 2021
Hello, I'm Yeeno. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Prime Minister of Canada, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.    Yee no   (talk) 🍁 07:15, 30 September 2021 (UTC) Hello, I'm Maria Rabinovich I provided a very reliable source, such as the text of a letter from the Office of the Prime Minister of Canada, some official documentation of the Superior Court of Justice in Ontario (published in its official website), and a number of other official letters from Canadian officials, offices and agencies the Office of the Prime Minister of Canada referred to.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Prime Minister of Canada, you may be blocked from editing.   — Wiki Linuz  ( 💬 ) 08:50, 30 September 2021 (UT
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards. Also remember, a WP:USERGENERATED content is not considered a reliable source. Please read our relevant policies.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Maria Rabinovich Canada is a democratic country and, accordingly, a letter from the Office of the Prime Minister of Canada in support of an Israeli Ph.D. student should be published in the Wikipedia to become a lawful subject for public discussion. Hence, I am ready to discuss any necessary corrections and edit my ad as consensually agreed.
 * If you want a material to be published on Wikipedia, it should be supported by a reliable source and must be verifiable. Your addition is not only giving WP:UNDUE weight, but also sourced from a user generated content sites like Yelp.ca, which fails WP:RS. — Wiki Linuz  ( 💬 ) 10:53, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Maria Rabinovich The documents published on the sites hyperlinked in that yelp.com page are not a "user-generated" content, but official documents, including a court documentation published on an official court webpage and even a letter on behalf of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. Let the administrators of the Wikipedia decide if they should be hidden from general public.

Your recent editing history at Prime Minister of Canada shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Just ' i ' yaya  12:03, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Anarchyte ( talk ) 12:04, 30 September 2021 (UTC) Maria Rabinovich The rule you referred to states: "An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert." It means the user WikiLinuz should be blocked, not I. It is disciminative and against the Wikipedia's rules.