User talk:Mariam Nasrullah/sandbox

Mariam loved you article contribution. Excellent way to add the ethics portion into your article while still remaining Neutral. Loved reading your article. Sounded like an article I would read on Wikipedia. Amazing Job, Keep it up :) (LuzRaudales (talk) 00:37, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Luz Raudales

Claudio's Review: You have been working hard! Your article contribution is already extremely helpful, having added the section with the most information. This section that is dedicated to the kickbacks scandal, goes very in depth on an important issue pertaining to the article. The writing in this section is also very factual and does not seem to have any bias. I would recommend adding hyperlinks for some terminology such as "Medicare". The article you chose has a very strong introductory paragraph, providing a detailed synopsis of what the article is about. Unfortunately, the other sections are not as filled with content. You can use the introduction to your advantage by going more in depth on the different topics addressed in the other paragraphs. In terms of sources, this article seems to have many good ones. In addition you have added two strong sources. You should also double check the sources that have been repeated in the references section. Keep it up!Claudiopinero (talk) 03:33, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Prof R Feedback
adding § on kickbacks helps article immensely...be sure to proofread for grammar/spelling...add citations and hyperlinks (helpful)...language is factual...last sentence in kickback § may create a new section (time permitting & given source availability) Micalva (talk) 18:10, 16 April 2019 (UTC)