User talk:Marian1981

Welcome!
Hello, Marian1981, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 13:27, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Getting started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

June 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=612765122 your edit] to Bruno Gollnisch may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:27, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * the Jobbik party of Hungary, declared that the Treaty of Trianon was "unjust and shameful." {cite web|url=http://www.jobbik.com/bruno_gollnisch_trianon_unjust_-_speech_jobbik%E2%80%99s_
 * of irredentist claims on Romanian territory and the redrawing of the map of Europe. {cite web|url=http://www.euractiv.com/central-europe/romania-condemns-irredentist-sta-news-529799 |

I am in the same situation with Biruitorul who's waging editing wars
Biruitorul is vandalizing the article of Justin Capra by putting his stub over a more complete article (last edited by me) which has plenty of references. I would like to help with Florescu brothers - the article is a keep, there are plenty of references, and it is not easy to make a film. It is not Biruitorul who decides if they are notable, he's take is if they had more than 1 movie, they were notable. Why is he imposing artificial criteria, and since when, who is this guy who's vandalizing the wiki, who is bordering rudeness and illogicality? Florescu brothers are notable, because of what they created, and because of plenty of references in newspapers. And more than 1 is an invented criteria by Biruitorul. There are plenty of people that wrote 1 book, or had one shot, life is short. Biruitorul acts like he's the ruler, but his decisions are illogical. What can I do? I felt very bad myself and even thought to not contribute to wikipedia anymore - over Biruitorul vandalism over the Justin Capra. He does the same with Florescu brothers and who knows how many other articles. Can you help? Eminescus (talk) 17:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Florescu brothers
Please do no redirect an article while an AfD is ongoing. While a redirect is the likely outcome of the discussion, it is very bad form to short circuit the discussion and enact your preferred outcome unilaterally. Be patient - after 7 days, an administrator will close the discussion and redirect the article is there is consensus to do so. Thank you, ThaddeusB (talk) 14:25, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Hello, I'm Mdann52. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Florescu brothers— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mdann52 (talk) 16:41, 27 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Do not disrupt the AfD by prematurely redirecting the article again. If you do, it will be reported as vandalsim and may result in a block. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:42, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

They're not letting me merge the articles either. I tried to revert back to what you had but they didn't let me. Can you actually give your opinion on the subject? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paperpencils (talk • contribs) 18:56, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Portrait of Radu Florescu.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Portrait of Radu Florescu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:18, 18 December 2017 (UTC)