User talk:Marianneskolek

Hello Ms. Skolek -- thank you for your earlier message and for creating an account. Please let me know if I can be of assistance. Dppowell (talk) 17:06, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Purdue Pharma
Please discuss your changes, which have been deemed controversial and reverted before, on the article's talk page. All material, but especially the controversial stuff, should be verifiable, and supported by a reliable source. Edit warring is not the way to impose your point of view here. Pcap ping  13:58, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * hi - just to follow up on this, I understand where you're coming from, but material on Wikipedia needs to be verifiable through appropriate sources. Certainly, the charges and convictions against Purdue are notable and verifiable, and belong in the article. However, the material about your efforts does require independent, reliable sources for verification and inclusion. Please don't edit-war or repeatedly insert it; come to the article talk page, ideally with such verifiable material, and discuss it. If you keep reinserting the unsourced material without attempting to garner some sort of agreement or consensus, then your account may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please also take a look at our dispute resolution procedures. Thanks. MastCell Talk 20:45, 2 December 2008 (UTC)