User talk:Marianocecowski/Archive06

'''DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.'''

This archive page covers the dates between July 1 2007 and August 31 2009

Post replies to the main talk page, copying the section you are replying to if necessary. (See How to archive a talk page.)

Julio Del Rios
Could you help to make sure that this made up rubbish is deleted as soon as possible please. thanks, King of the North East 13:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Again vandalism in the demographics
Could you paid atention to the new modification in the Argentinian section, becuase Pablo has gone on vacations. And there has been a rise of changes and adding of irrelevant and misundertanding facts there.

I know we have been building the Argentinian site for like wow three years now. But like always another guy who doesn't bother in read the archive with the previous discussions is changing the section. Dunadan or something like that.

Dunadan we decided included the genetic research (the one you posted is not the only one and other ones contradict this one). Besides we discussed it was made to the entire population (10% of which is not Argentinean-born but immigrants).

You are putting the minority groups that were taken in that research (which was very discussed anyway) into the majority of the population.

Second we (like Americans, brazilians and Canadians) decided not to included the diversed genetic studies because is not relevant, is like said norwegian because they have a 1% of african admixture are not scandinavian!.

Check out the archive of discussions in the Argentinian section, and you'll the other studies too. We just added in the largest article.

As for the article we decided only included the official numbers of the government and the CIA.

As for the research you cited (which is just one of many) with different results, and the ones that are made to white people are the ones that account to have in mind the admixture in white people, which you just seems to included without noticed that the research was made to the inhabitants a great percentage not "Argentines", you're misunderstanding some dates. that was about mtda and y-chromosome not about mixture in dna.

And what the reaserch shows (again there was another research with another very different results) is that 10% have mtda and y-chromosomes form their parent that COULD BE (but not necessary are) compatible with native americans. You can have 80% european descendents and come out with these results, and anyway, the markers taken as native american are presented in a minority of southern europeans (again check out the archive) and are common in Asians (which account for about 1% of the Argentinian inhabitants this days).

And finally because of this and because the phenotipical traits are the most important in the Argentina, the United States etc for race. And they are present in like the census said 95% of the NATIONAL population, those are the numbers important at least in this article.

And again check out the previous discussions in this subject. Americans decided not to included the results of distant native americans ancestries in white people in the main article because of the same reason that we Argentinians didn't because the are many they don't agree with each other and because they are not relevant for this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.16.20.42 (talk • contribs) 05:37, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Dengue
You might like to check out this blog concerning your repeated reversion of edits:

http://www.shrapnelfromaloosecannon.com/index.php?s=wikipedia

You might also like to check out the World Health Organisation site cited. It does say "day-time biting".

Bathrobe 08:33, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your message. I'm not sure what you mean by "a long time", but if you look at the blog in question you'll notice that it is dated April this year. The history of the article suggests that it is you who made the reversions.


 * Bathrobe 01:23, 19 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I mentioned the blog because I thought you might be interested in what someone is saying about you. Instead of checking it out, you first give me a blank look ("I have to deduce that message was destinated to someone else") and then propose some nonsensical cleanup of the article.


 * Perhaps instead of stonewalling you should check out the blog I mentioned, take a look at the WHO source mentioned there, and just possibly consider changing the information at the article. Why does the entire article need a cleanup when a source for correcting factual information is being shoved right under your nose?


 * Bathrobe 00:50, 20 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks!
 * Bathrobe 02:23, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Heroic Valour in Combat Cross
Hello, this Argentine award article is named 'Argentine Nation to the Heroic Valour in Combat Cross'. This seems to read as mixed up English. Is this a true translation of the title of the award? Perhaps it should read 'Heroic Valour in Combat Cross to the Argentine Nation' .. which still seems wrong. Or simply 'Heroic Valour in Combat Cross (Argentina)' or without the country reference since it is likely to be unique just under the award's name. Example: the Polish award - Virtuti Militari. Thanks for your help. --maxrspct  ping me  00:48, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Haha splendid thanks! I will make a redirect for the shortened version. Well.. thinking about it ..it does actually make sense in 'grandiose speak' since the Argentine Nation is giving the award to whoever exercised the heroic valour in combat. Hmm. --maxrspct  ping me  17:26, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

WP:ArF

 * I thought you might be interested in my latest creation: WikiProject Argentine football, kind regards King of the North East 22:37, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Estudiantes_de_La_Plata_logo.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Estudiantes_de_La_Plata_logo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bigr Tex  21:23, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Jorge Valdano's Talk page
Mariano,

As part of the new ArF WikiProject, King of the North East, Tangerines and myself are adding to, cleaning up and tagging Argentine footballers. It came to my attention that there is a lot of unrelated crap in Talk:Jorge Valdano. I saw that a year ago you restored it after some deletion. Any particular reason why that stuff has to be there? I understand that generally Talk pages stay intact but I see no point in keeping that garbage that has nothing to do with the article. I thought I should ask before dumping the section. -- Alexf (t/c) 00:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Mapa
Hola Mariano, no sé bien cómo hacer con lo del mapa de Argentina (político, imagemap). Me hablaste de un template pero no sé qué es ni cómo se hace. Me explicarías? Gracias, Daniel. Dgutson

Qué hago
Mariano, tanto tiempo! Gracias por mandarme el link. Por una de esas casualidades o porque este país es un pañuelo, un tipo que está en la Wikipedia en español y en Commons y que es fotógrafo de Flickr (donde yo posteo fotos regularmente) descubrió que yo también estuve por acá y me mandó una invitación para la reunión fundacional del 1º de septiembre. No pude ir. Estoy con varios blogs, un flamante sitio web personal, y la fotografía. No abandoné Wikipedia pero estoy chequeando mi watchlist cada tanto y poco más. Un abrazo! —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 22:20, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Hey up
Nice work on the Superclasico article, this is the state I found it in the other day. I also did these if you want to check over them Paulo Valentim & Hugo Curioni. Now I'm going to have a look for a new Boca crest to replace the one that b*stard bot just deleted. Kindest regards, King of the  North East (T/C) 22:38, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi from El Bolson
Disculpas no se ingles como para escribirlo. Mariano te cuento que tengo muchas fotos de El Bolson, originales, si queres agregar. Te dejo mi mail bwnpatagonia .at. gmail .dot. com Saludos--Diegomur 20:11, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Are you back
Hi, I noticed that you went away for a while, leaving people like me to waste our lives away editing wikipedia on our own. Are you sticking around, or is it a flying visit? Best regards as always, King of the  North East 21:14, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Sakotis!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Here's a Sakotis for you! This cake promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving this cake to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others! Happy editing! Fernando Buceta (talk) 10:50, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Damián A. Fernández Beanato
I saw that you tried to delete this article. I also think it doesn't meet the notability guidelines, so I listed it in the articles for deletion section. Please feel free to give your opinion there. --PeterCantropus (talk) 19:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Rec.Sport.Soccer Statistics Foundation
I have nominated Rec.Sport.Soccer Statistics Foundation, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Rec.Sport.Soccer Statistics Foundation. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? DarkAudit (talk) 23:23, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

La Guerra Gaucha
Hi I';ve begun work on La Guerra Gaucha which is a featured article on spanish wiki. Could you help me translate the article? ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦      $1,000,000? 19:40, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. Cheers! -- Alexf42 21:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Bueno verte de nuevo
Good to see you back around here (a pesar de ser "bostero" :-). If you have the time, please take a look at the current state of Portal:Argentina which I have been maintaining lately. I'd like to propose it for featured portal at some point, but even though I have asked people for comments and criticisms, have not received any to date. -- Alexf42 14:59, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Wow
More edits in a week than in the preceeding year! Do you have some time off work or something? I'm trying to kick the addiction to this place, but when the family sleep I keep sneaking off to my computer for a couple of hours editing. All the best E P 21:28, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

San Ignacio Miní
way back in August 2005, you edited the San Ignacio Miní article which was started by an IP. Would you have the source material available and could you please provide it. Gnangarra 06:00, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * After receiving a complaint via otrs ticket: 2008081910003825, I was able to establish that the article was a copyright violation of this site, without a version to revert to I've deleted the article under CSD#G12. Gnangarra 01:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Referencing
Hi. I noticed your recent edit on List of first female holders of political offices in the Americas. Unfortunately, Wikipedia policy is that references need to be within the article, not in another article. Could you add the references from the articles you mention in your edit summary into the list? Thanks. SP-KP (talk) 11:51, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Argentish
Hi Mariano, I saw your asking for page deletion on the "Argentish", yes I know that there are non cited expression but I can assure you that there are English speaker most of them learning ones who use those expressions. The more surprisingly fact that I found is that those expressions and words certainly have citations in the BA Herald or others sources, couldn't be in other way. I'll be expecting your help as an Argentine to preserve the linguistic patrimony of our country. Have a good evening. Carau (Carau) 19:14, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Argentina/United Provinces
I reverted your changes, with a comment on the Talk Page as to why. The name Argentina was first used in 1826 but was not adopted formally till 1836, long after the events of 1833. Justin talk 09:55, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Template to be deleted
Hi Mariano, could you please delete this odd template: It does not comply with template naming conventions (being a talkpage), I can't even TfD it. Even if it were properly made, the consensus is that we only allow templates for the World Cup and the highest level of continental tournament. Regards E P 23:22, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Inappropriate link in the "TAM" article
Hi Mariano, I've just removed the following link from the TAM wikiarticle: The reason is that it has been assessed by this article's "author" (User:Catalan) as inappropriate for an A-Class article. If you give a look at the article's history, you'll see that it has been added and subsequently removed (undid) several times in the last weeks. It'd be greatly appreciated if you can please help us keep the article's quality by removing this or any other inadequate link that you might detect, if in doubt please contact any experienced editor related to the Military history WikiProject. Many thanks & kind regards, DPdH (talk) 02:55, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Historz

Regarding "talk" pages.
Mariano:

Thank you for your recent edit to my talk page.

If it's all the same to you, I'd prefer to keep that reminder of what can only be described as an injustice out of there, however seldom I look at it.

I was blocked for trying to do what a number of others had attempted and like them, of course, without success; but, how could one possibly?

The material a number of editors tried to extricate entailed controverisal scientific research and was not peer-reviewed - the bare-bones minimal standard ANY encyclopedia uses when including such items. Failure to abide by this basic tenet when referencing scientific studies is what, for instance, allowed universities in the southern United States and in South Africa to publish "findings" proving the inferiority of blacks, as well as institutions both here and in the USSR to publicize "studies" demeaning to one side or the other.

All this, nevertheless, did not stop the individual who put it into the "Argentina" page and several others (after, no doubt, spending hours scouring the internet for it - the study dates from 2004) from imposing this, even going so far as to patronize and condescend any one who objected; once, he even argued over it with a geneticist and (obviously) unable to win the argument, he told him he AGREED...and proceeded to replace the injurious item.

Mariano, by now I think you must know whom it is I'm referring to: "the Dúnadan." That guy.

This same editor, I should tell you, routinely adds embellishing claims on the Mexican page and, despite being meticulous to an extreme, allows grossly overstated (and unsourced) numbers on the same page to stand. No doubt, unflattering facts should be included, if relevant. I don't regret having added mention of: the number of slum households, the percentage lacking running water, educational and health care shortcomings and other facets of Argentine reality that had been previously glossed over; I also repeatedly excised figures claiming "97%" of Argentines are white - an undeniable exaggeration (most sources seem to agree on 85%). Common sense should dictate, though, that one cannot impose claims on others' countries when one isn't willing to accept realities at home.

I was asked to discuss changes with him on the "talk" page (and I did, through the edit summary, just as he does); but with someone who turns to "devil's advocate" tactics and sock puppets on the first disagreement?

You know, I may be young; but I've seen my share of ulterior motives and, having spent nearly half my life in California, know how hostile SOME folks from Mexico can be around Argentines or the subject of Argentina. As you may know, they tend to be touchy on the subject of race and often harbor misgivings for Argentines, seemingly under the impression that Argentines are arrogant (if they only knew how deprecating many Argentines are with their own country). Other Mexicans are beautiful people, on the other hand (and how!); since this individual chooses to bear chips on his shoulder, though, you guys might want to ask him to stop.

I intend to leave the subject of the "scientfic finding" alone; I'll leave it to someone else. Life's too short and, besides, Dúnny must have his own struggles.

All the best, 75.82.22.106 (talk) 15:00, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Page Edit Question
Hello Mariano, I noticed that you have tagged the page InsWeb as not showing enough notability. There are now 4 links to outside sources in this entry, is that enough to prove notability? I'm new to Wikipedia and want to make sure I'm doing this right. Thanks. Inszo95 (talk) 20:24, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

From your message I realize you didn't bother reading Notability. The links you provide are not really meaninful. I suggest you try things such as this, and work over the notability in the text itself, not just linking. Mariano (t/c) 20:32, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for commenting so quickly--I appreciate your help. Actually, I did read Notability and from what I read it says that notability is proven through "coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject,” and that “the best way to address this concern is to reference published, third-party sources about the subject.” I’m not sure how articles from | CWNET are more reliable than ones from | Forbes, | Reuters Moneyline or the| Sacramento Business Journal, which I cited, but thanks for the source. I believe that the notability of this subject has been proven through the 5 references-- there are only so many ways to say that a company was founded in a certain year and does a certain thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inszo95 (talk • contribs) 21:41, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Guillermo Barros Schelotto - POV
C'mon Mariano: "in what was probably his best season" reads like POV to me. -- Alexf42 17:32, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

origins of the Bicycle Kick
Was it invented in Peru or Chile? I think this section of the article is a little bit long and vague. Maybe you could look into this argument if you have time, I'm a bit slow at reading the Spanish sources. Kind regards, E P 22:46, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Good luck trying to get anything done when User:MarshalN20 is very protective of changes. Selecciones de la Vida (talk) 16:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Why do you, Selecciones de la Vida, constantly seek to get people to work against me? Mariano, comparing the section with past versions, your advice was taken and the section of Peru was greatly shortened to its current version. You can check the differences with the history section of the article. As I previously notified to you, the length of the Peruvian section is not much, and the section certainly has no need for information to be taken out. If other sections in the article are short (such as the Chilean section), then that simply means they don't hold as much factual information as the Peruvian section. Nonetheless, if this commentary bothers you in any way, I apologize for coming into your talk page to discuss this with you, Mariano.--MarshalN20 (talk) 18:31, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Requesting neutral assistance from other editors should not be taken personally. The Peruvian section contains examples of information such as tennis, the detailed naming history of Lima Cricket Club, and claims that Peru's sports foundation is older than Argentina's, Chile's, and Uruguay's that do not add towards the claim and can easily be accessed through a provided wikilink. Selecciones de la Vida (talk) 02:21, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Such things were created as a result of your constant challenging of my information. Of course, prior to what you wrote, such things were fixed as Mariano suggested. So don't try to take away credit for something you did not do.--MarshalN20 (talk) 02:32, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

ARA Almirante Irízar (Q-5)‎
You were quick, I planned to check that at lunch time and re-add it if it proved correct. Justin talk 08:45, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I had to go to a machine outside the firewall to access Lloyds list. No worries.  Justin talk 10:21, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Chalaca
First, you did not send me a message about the edits you were planning on making to the article. Hence you did not receive a reply from me. Second, just like Selecciones de la Vida, you do not seem to understand that the "chalaca" does not revolve around Jorge Barraza. The concept of the word and its history revolves around the city of Callao. Jorge Barraza is simply what could be called a reliable spokesperson that agrees (or validates under his opinion) the claim of Callao. Third, and what shocked me the most, what do you mean that Panama is not from North America? By just simply reading that comment from your edit it really, really, really, takes down your credibility as a knowledgeable person under my eyes.--MarshalN20 (talk) 22:51, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Current squad / navbox
Please can you try to help me to work out a way of combining the current squad and the navbox on Association football pages, I have asked a couple of experienced editors directly, at Wikiproject football and at the Village Pump but apart from a few positive comments and an unsuccessful attempt to help I got nowhere.

Using Arsenal de Sarandí as an example the proposal is that since the navbox and current squad display almost exactly the same information, using almost the same code:


 * (currentsquad)
 * (navbox)

We could amend Template:Football squad or make an alternative, using switch functions and code like:



So that it displays something similar to the current squad when transcribed like along with the [v] [d] [e] functions to allow the transcluded squad to be easily modified from the team article and a "last updated" header. There are several reasons this would be beneficial I will outline some of them:
 * 1) Keeping similar information in the same place and avoiding repetition makes sense for obvious reasons.
 * 2) Casual editors often edit one or the other, rarely both, meaning that the 2 ways of displaying the squads often contain contradictory information, combining the functions would make this kind of contradiction impossible.
 * 3) Editors like myself who spend/waste our time updating player and team articles during the transfer window currently have to make at least 5 edits per player transfer (1. Update player article 2. Remove player from former team article 3. Remove player from former team navbox 4. Place player into new team article 5. Place player into new team navbox) combining the current squad and the navbox would reduce this to three edits, reducing transfer window workload by 40%, (which is a lot of edits considering in just one league (Primera División Argentina) the clubs amassed nearly 300 transfers in the most recent bi-annual transfer frenzy).
 * 4) Introducing a "last updated" parameter would make it easier to search out and update outdated squad information.

Please give it your thought, if you cannot help, maybe you can think of someone who can? E <font color="#66CCFF">P 23:29, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Bicycle Kick
FYI, I have opened discussions at WP:FOOTBALL and WP:WIKIQUETTE. <font color="#FF0000">E <font color="#66CCFF">P 23:34, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Andrés Nocioni under GA review
Hi there, I see that you are a primary contributor to the article Andrés Nocioni. This article has come under review for Good article reassessment as part of GA Sweeps and a number of problems have been identified which are listed on the talk page. Please begin to address these points in the next seven days or the article will be delisted from GA and will have to go through the WP:GAN process all over again to regain its status once improvements have been made. If you have any questions, please drop me a line.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:43, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

The Latin-American Wikipedia Meeting
<div style="background-color: #00BFFF; margin: 0; border: 3px solid #46b; padding: 7px 7px 7px 7px; -moz-border-radius:12px">

Tosão (talk) 22:15, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi!If you want to help,sign here.One question:this event before Wikimania 2009 isn't going to disturbe the Wikimedia Argentina?Tosão (talk) 15:13, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Andrés Nocioni/1
As one of the article's leading editors, please comment at Good article reassessment/Andrés Nocioni/1.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:24, 19 April 2009 (UTC)