User talk:Mariarrt/CNS Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor

Peer Review (From Dixiang)

This article is easy to understand even the topic is complex. It gives an overview of the Central Nervous System Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor(PNET) by multiple sections. The introduction shows a clear and brief description of the PNET. Meanwhile, 6 sections are put in proper order. In my opinion, there should be a section to talk about the history of the PNET to show the process of researching this disease. Meanwhile, the section talking about the progress on researching the PNET could be added as well, if there is any paper showing the new discovery about it. The most important thing to improve this article is having some pictures of the PNET. Some pictures could make readers much easier to have an image and understand the article better.

Peer Review (From Connor W.)

This article is extremely well written. This is a topic I don't have much prior knowledge on, so it was a lot of information to process as it is very condensed, but after reading through a few times I was able to understand what you were saying. There are occasional spelling/grammar errors, but this is a rough draft so it is to be expected. My only note on the way you've written this is to either explain things briefly in the text, as you use a lot of heavy scientific terms, or link some of the terms to other pages so that people can better understand what you're trying to say. I know you mentioned this in your sandbox, but adding images will definitely improve your page greatly. My last suggestion would be to go through your page slowly and improve the writing flow. Your article is very term and definition heavy as well as being very dense. Improving flow so that readers can follow along easier would be good. Your article was informative and I enjoyed reading it, its always fun to learn something new. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WizardZorander (talk • contribs) 13:38, 26 February 2019 (UTC)