User talk:Marie Andry/Magma ocean

Evaluating Article Content
Everything in the article does appear to be relevant to the topic. There is nothing off topic within the article except for the mention of the moon-forming impact and the lunar magma ocean. However, those two mentions may assist in providing context for a better understanding of what magma oceans are and how they come to be. The part in the article that refers to the energy for melting objects coming from large impacts was distracting. This statement should be expanded on more for full understanding of its context and meaning. Three of the sources within the references section are from the early and late 1990’s which could be considered out of date when considering the comparison of the advancement of technology at that time and now. A few things that could be added to the article or improved are examples, artistic renderings of what a magma ocean may look like, and what the consequences or aftereffects of the presence of a magma ocean are. Information such as approximately how long they last, if that kind of information is known, and how they are formed could also be beneficial towards the completion of the article. The scientific information is generally presented clearly throughout the article and no jargon or slang is used. Throughout the article there are also links to other articles in order to give context to what the sentences are referring to. The term ‘accretion’ the phrase ‘moon-forming impact’ and ‘siderophile elements’ are all things within the article that have links to them. These links are helpful because the reader may visit them in order to gain more background knowledge about magma oceans and things related to the topic.--Marie Andry (talk) 18:53, 13 October 2021 (UTC)