User talk:Marie Garcia

January 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to The Wedding Singer, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Justeditingtoday (talk) 17:55, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Question on editing history
Have you been editing here previously as 108.16.33.43 and 108.52.156.107? You are making the same edits and they were both warned numerous times about using original research to give fictional characters "full names". Justeditingtoday (talk) 18:25, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Carrie (1976 film). Justeditingtoday (talk) 19:33, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Steven Jay Russell does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 15:52, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2019
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in To All the Boys I've Loved Before (film). There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. You were previously reverted when you changed away from the credited names from this film, so it's not like you were unaware of WP:FILMCAST. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:01, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * It looks like you are still doing this – please stop: names should only be listed as credited, as per WP:FILMOGRAPHY, WP:FILMCAST, and WP:TVCAST. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:10, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)