User talk:Marija2

Since you are a new user, you may be unfamiliar with the "explain reverts" guideline of Wikipedia. I have copied it for you from the page Reverting. This is the reason why your unexplained revert in the Neo-Nazi article will be cancelled. --Zmaj 10:47, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Explain reverts
Being reverted can feel a bit like a slap in the face &mdash; "I worked hard on those edits, and someone just rolled it all back". However, sometimes a revert is the best response to a less-than-great edit, so we can't just stop reverting. What's important is to let people know why you reverted. This helps the reverted person because they can remake their edit, but fixing whatever problem it is that you've identified.

Explaining reverts also helps other people. For example, it lets people know whether they need to even view the reverted version (in the case of e.g. "rv page blanking"). Because of the lack of non-verbal communication online, if you don't explain things clearly people will probably assume all kinds of nasty things, and that's one of the possible causes for edit wars.

If your reasons for reverting are too complex to explain in the edit summary, drop a note on the Talk page. A nice thing to do is to drop the note on the Talk page first, and then revert, rather than the other way round. Sometimes the other person will agree with you and revert for you before you have a chance. Conversely, if someone reverts your change without apparent explanation, you may wish to wait a few minutes to see if they explain their actions on the article's talk page or your user talk page.

Please, be honest...
Hi,

I don't want to vandalise Your pages, but I will just ask You to be honest and explain how did You come to an idea to write for wikipedia?

If that is not a secret, please explain how did You como to this idea?
 * Did You just googled and found it yourself or some other wikipedia user ask You to come and help.

Please, be honest. Thanks.

Regards, --Ante Perkovic 11:51, 22 May 2006 (UTC)