User talk:Marinazaffari

Ahmad Javeed Ahwar
You will find your work on this new page: Ahmad Javeed Ahwar. Best wishes --Frze (talk) 20:07, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Your edits
Do not change the article WikiMapia again and again. This will be considered as VANDALISM ! Use the page Ahmad Javeed Ahwar !! --Frze (talk) 09:40, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

I reported Ricky81682 to ANI for the 400 crore bullshit he's trying to do. The list of highest gross only has 400 because he hates Indian movies but he wants to be god king here

Bajrangi Bhaijaan
In response to this comment, NO, the page does not need to be updated on an hourly basis because there are no legitimate serious source that will give you hourly update, just BS guessing from random websites. There is no deadline here, this is not for a daily news website. Koimoi.com is a blog which is not a reliable source, there is zero information about the website, we have no idea who they are and we have no evidence they aren't just making up their numbers. Also, do not attack others for fixing things. I removed the link to indicine.com here (another blog) and spent a good ten minutes trying to find something that wasn't in the 350 or lower range (as most credible, legitimate sources that aren't posting bullshit actually take a day or two to do their job properly) and posted the 400 number because that's the best one I could find. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:26, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Dear friend, Salman khan I absolutely disagree with you. It shows lack of interest to something. Someone called @dudepans in twitter is claiming that he is intentionally editing BajrangiBhaijaan to remain below Balubali film. I complained last time. Instead of simply rejecting my claim, please do investigate and check the history of the page that someone is trying to edit this page on daily basis and enter 400 crore as final collection of the movie. It is shameful that wiki cannot control it. at least go to www.boxofficeindia.com and they say is around 495 crore worldwide collection. Instead of replying my request, do something. I do not need a reply. Instead the info in this page should be corrected and that abuser should be blocked.

Proposed deletion of Path Dependency and the International Conferences on Afghanistan: From Bonn 2001 to Bonn 2011


The article Path Dependency and the International Conferences on Afghanistan: From Bonn 2001 to Bonn 2011 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * References are highly dependent on primary sources, appears largely promotional, looks like the author has a COI, and no significant claim to the books notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sadads (talk) 03:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)