User talk:Marine 69-71/Archive 21

Note: This an archive only. To talk to me go to Talk

VA-42
I need the help of an Administrator to sort out a glitch. All US Navy & Marine squadrons in Wikipedia are named according to their alpha-numeric designation. Attack Squadron 42 (U.S. Navy) needs to be moved to "VA-42" but the spot is already taken as someone originally set it up as a disambiguation page. I moved the disambiguation page to VA-42 (disambiguation) to make way for it but I can't change it without administrator priveledges. Please advise. Respectfully submitted, Pen of bushido (talk) 06:00, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Tony, I respectfully request your assistance for the same issue WRT Training Squadron 10 which should be named "VT-10". I created the VT-10 (disambiguation) page for deconfliction.  R/S, Pen of bushido (talk) 18:48, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

fr:Utilisateur:Le sotré/Histoire militaire de Porto Rico
Hi Tony!

thanks for your update in fr:Utilisateur:Le sotré/Histoire militaire de Porto Rico ! I have some troubles with my internet connexion so I'm a bit late for the translation, but it should be over within 2 weeks. Le sotré (talk) 17:29, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Jonny Moseley
I just had a look at Jonny Moseley, and I am troubled to see you blocked an account with no warnings whatsoever - particularly given that the account name suggests some connection to the subject of the article. That you did so for "constant vandalism" six days after the account's last edit, which had come nearly a full month after the edit before that is simply gobsmacking. Such behavior is completely unacceptable - especially for somebody who appears to be editing a BLP that they have some involvement in. Please be more careful in the future. Phil Sandifer (talk) 20:50, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm glad that you took a look at Jonny Moseley but, you should take a look at the changes made by the other editor before coming to my "talk" with an attitude. I don't care if an editor create an account with a name that may suggest some connection to the subject of the article. That is an assumption on your behave, because you know very well that anyone can create an account with whatever name they please. Especially those who are "fans" of a specific subject.

Now, before you come to my talk page to complain, take the time to look at the other person's edits: On May 15, 2008 -, On June 8, 2008 and on June 22, 2008. Not only did the person delete a well written encyclopedic version of the article, but the person insisted in posting a fan type of article with POV's in total disregard to the established format, not once but three times. This my friend, in my book, is the same as vandalism.

Even if the editor has some involvement with the subject, the editor may add to the article without distorting it's format and even then he or she is subject to the rules which we all must follow which states that he or she must refrain from POV's and provide verifiable reliable sources to back up whatever they post. Tony the Marine (talk) 22:15, 6 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I looked at the edits. The fact remains that it is TOTALLY inappropriate to ban without warning, especially when the user is not posing any sort of active vandalism threat (given their slow speed of editing). Yes - there are other possible explanations for the username. But this is part of why we warn before blocking - to give people a chance to explain and provide more information. Instead you assumed bad faith, blocked without warning and counter to the blocking policy, and created nothing but hurt feelings and ill will. That you think this action was defensible is appalling. Phil Sandifer (talk) 22:53, 6 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Ouch! I'm being scolded in my talk page. *You are entitled to your opinion on the matter and you have expressed yourself. As for me, I am no longer interested in hearing from you. I have much better things to do, like creating interesting articles for our readers to read then to pursue this any further. Tony the Marine (talk) 23:18, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Just wanted to remind you about the blocking policy. Remember, blocks should never be used punitively; only block to prevent disruption or harm to the encyclopedia. Looking at this block log, both of your blocks were rather inappropriate. The first one, 1 week after the users last edit was in no way preventative. The second block, 2 hours after the last edit, was not preventative either. Also, you failed to warn the user to cease his or her disruptive activity, which believe it or not, can be quite an effective alternative to blocking. I see Phil tried to explain this to you, but you didn't seem to care, so I'd strongly urge you to refrain from these types of inappropriate blocks in the future. Thanks, Rjd0060 (talk) 23:39, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Notice

 * I realize that it was my "bad" and that I should have warned the person that I would block them (not "ban" as Phil stated), for distorting a well written article by blanking the page and creating a fansite full of POV's, not once, but three times. My mistake. However, let me make myself clear. Everybody is more then welcomed to come to my talk page to point out any mistake which I may have made, I am only human, without an atitude and critizing me as if I were some type of criminal. I believe that as a long-time contributor, that I deserve and have earned the respect of my peers. I do "not" appreciate  User:Phil Sandifer atititude towards me and I expect that in the future, the conversations in this page be carried out with respect and a level of understanding without accussing me of "behavior completely unacceptable" and that what I believed were "good-faithed" actions to be "appalling". I have had great and interesting conversations in this talk page which have helped enlightened me as a contributor, but I feel that I must express myself in what I believe should be the correct manner in discussing issues. Tony the Marine (talk) 00:56, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

El Boricuazo
http://libroboricuazo.com/

Hi Tony:

Please provide me with a physicial address so that I may forward to you a copy of "el Boricuazo, Tu Orgullo Nacioan" book. Thanks to you my dad was also included here. The Medicine section only names 4 physicians; he is one of them. thanks.

Edwin Muniz Jr. edwmun9@aol.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Physioed (talk • contribs) 18:26, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Francisco Coimbre
Respuestas: Ok, Pancho began playing baseball in a school league in 1922. The series actually happened in 1928, the same year that he debuted against San Juan. I botched the series' date and then used the prose to fill the infobox, botching it there as well. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  03:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Hey Tony, "Licey" is short for Tigres del Licey, of the DR's oldest teams. La Guaira is a city in Venezuela; Santa Marta is an oddly named team. I will take some time to check the police's website, I think they have copies of their records there. However, according to the MLB reference being used the house fire was accidental, supposedly begining in the kitchen's stove when Pancho was cooking something. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  23:49, 8 July 2008 (UTC)


 * You did a terrific job, I did a few tweaks to it but it all looks good. I will follow Baldorioty de Castro's example here and give it a shot, thanks for the great work, cheers. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  01:11, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Certainly, quite a formidable one if you ask me, cheers. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  01:25, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Hey Tony, Francisco Coimbre just passed GAC, so far we are 2 for 2 as a team, hopefully that will rise to 3 for 3 in a few weeks, cheers. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  00:29, 14 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I have been working with some material outside of the project which should be ready by Tuesday, cheers. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  01:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Hey Tony, I have been aware that this article is going to be main page material since yesterday, its going to be the third main page FA for the project and hopefully that will improve to four in November if Puerto Rico's FA-push goes well, congratulations! -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  02:23, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Charles Phillips on List of Marines page.
Reference added.

The traditional rfa thank you message

 * The few. The Proud The Admins :) Semper Fi, Tony. TomStar81 (Talk) 03:38, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

RfB
 Mifter would like to nominate you to become a bureaucrat. Please visit Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Mifter to accept or decline the nomination. A page for your nomination at Requests for bureaucratship/ . If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.

Hi, being that you've been an admin for a few years and that you are one of the most well known and respected editors here on Wikipedia I was wondering if you would like to run to become a bureaucrat? I haven't created the page yet but if you are interested in giving RfB a go just leave a note on my talk page and then I'll create the page and put my nom in and then we'll put it out for the community to vote on :). If your not interested in running then no harm done, just leave a massage to me and we can both forget about all of this :). All the Best, --Mifter (talk) 17:47, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I feel honored that you would consider nominating me for bureaucrat, however due to the many obligations which I have, I regret that I must decline. Your kind words made my day and I only wish that certain disrespectful editor would learn from you and follow your example. Tony the Marine (talk) 03:12, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons
Thank you for uploading images/media to Wikipedia! There is, however, another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In future, please upload media there instead (see m:Help:Unified login). That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Moving images to the Commons (you may view images you have previously uploaded by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'image' namespace from the drop down box). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!--OsamaK 08:18, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * This note again ;).. I didn't see old one. Happy editing, Happy moving to Commons :)--OsamaK 08:19, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Disambiguation notice
Hello. Please notice that when you put this notice: at the bottom of a long article, then it's located where those who might be interested will never see it. I've moved it to the top. Michael Hardy (talk) 17:50, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * For the piragua (pirogue), the small, flat-bottomed boat, see: Pirogue.
 * For the piragua (pirogue), the small, flat-bottomed boat, see: Pirogue.

Facts section of Piragua article
You've made some great edits to the Piragua article. Way to go! I just added a template to the fact section of the article. Wikipedia policy is to not have sections like that listing information. Its much better to integrate them into the article. Keep up the good work, though. Eclectek  C   T  21:07, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Puerto Ricans in World War II
That's very kind of you. I'm just doing my tiny little bit to make WP a better place. J IM ptalk·cont 04:09, 17 July 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem, I'm always available to guard the quality of our project's articles. By the way, Lolita's book summary is almost complete, I will add one final expansion covering the trials tomorrow. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  00:35, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Assistance request
Sure. Uh...what can I do? Do you need help uploading the image? placement within the article? what exactly? — BQZip01 — talk 04:53, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The problem is that many images from websites are copyrighted. Unless you can find one from a free source, then you're SOL. You could try taking a picture yourself though.  — BQZip01 —  talk 05:49, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * You could browse through this and see if you can find the right one. I'm not an expert on cotton plants. — BQZip01 —  talk 22:09, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Your uploaded image
I noticed that you uploaded Image:VNCivilActionsRibbon.jpg. It has been suggested at the Graphics Lab that this image be converted from its JPG format into an SVG format. To do so, I would need to know what the object in the middle is. Seeing as you are the author of this work, could you possibly tell me what the object in the center is, and, even better, would you happen to have a higher resolution of this image? Thanks. -- p b r ok s 1 3 talk? 17:35, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Lolita Lebrón
The book has been completely squeezed, it has provided enough material to double the size of the article. Now I will need help with the "Later years" section, do you have a copy of El Vocero's issue being quoted? -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  02:07, 19 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Hey Tony, great work as always. Before nominating it, should we continue using the image in the infobox? since she is still alive, there is a good chance that a reviewer might want it removed due to WP:NFC. Although, I must admit that finding a "free" image was not possible, not even in Commons. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  21:28, 21 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Very interesting, intelligence is found in the genes of our people, which is something that makes me quite proud. As a side note, 2007 was a good year for our women, did you know that Tarah Gieger (Aguadillana) was the first woman to ever participate in a Motocross des Nations, debuting with Puerto Rico last year? One last thing before nominating, I have used this index to track down El Vocero's November 2000 archive, there are only two articles discussing the "International Tribunal on Violations of Human Rights in Puerto Rico and Vieques". The first one is Rivera Santos, Maricelis. "Tribunal Internacional declara culpable a EU." El Vocero, 22 de noviembre de 2000, p. 8 il. and the other is an interview with Juan Mari Brás: Santori, Margarita. "Satisfecho Mari Bras." El Vocero, 27 de noviembre de 2000,  p. 13 il.; do you recall the name of the issue or should we use both as a preventive measure? -   Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  22:30, 21 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok, that should do it. I will work with the nomination shortly, after dinner time, cheers. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  23:42, 21 July 2008 (UTC)


 * We're on, now comes the waiting game. In the meanwhile there are still two 300-page book in my library, I will try to accelerate the work with those, cheers. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  03:01, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Actually, in May of 2000, McClintock was neither President of the Senate (January 2005 -present), nor a member (actually Leader) of the NPP Minority (Jan. 2001-Dec. 2004), but a member of the NPP majority and, if I'm not mistaken, chairman of the "Comisión de Gobierno y Asuntos Federales". Pr4ever (talk) 04:34, 23 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The article just passed its nomination, I removed the lead image because of this, which seems more like a press image than a mugshot. That's 3 for 3, we're on a roll, aren't we? -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  20:00, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Alphabetization
I think that to alphabetize by first name is a total cop-out, running away from the problem. Nobody ever alphabetizes by first name. For the small minority of names that have a "de" or whatever, the rule in Spanish is that the dominant word in the paternal surname determines the order. Thus Eugenio María de Hostos falls under "H", Héctor O'Neill falls under "O' and not "N", Kenneth McClintock falls under "M" and not "C", but José De Diego falls under "De" and not "Di" because he capitalized his "De" and no one ever talks asbout him as "Diego" as they do refer to "Hostos" (as in Hostos College, not "De Hostos" College). Most of the users of List of Puerto Ricans do know Spanish, and the few that do not will not have a problem adapting since they are used to seeing Thomas Jefferson-J- way before George Washington-W- in their own list of presidents.  Hay que tomar el toro por los cuernos!-Pr4ever (talk) 08:05, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I thought you were kind of the main editor of the List of Puerto Rican? After reading your explanation, I've been looking in Wikipedia at dozens of other lists and have failed to come up with even one that alphabetizes based on first name!  For example, in the list of sculptors, you have difficult names like Lucien van Arend, which appears under the "A" of "Arend" and not the "V" of "van".  Once again, I'm willing to help "agarrar el toro por los cuernos".-Pr4ever (talk) 15:18, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * One other point. If you alphabetize by formal first names, and you're looking for former Chief Justice Cecil Snyder, the subject of one of my stubs, you'd never find him!  Why?  Because his name is actually Aaron (which he never used and hardly nobody knew).  A reasonable person would look for "Snyder".  Not finding him, a persistent, curious person would look for "Cecil".  Virtually no one would look for "Aaron".  Lists are made to facilitate research, not to create an impenetrable alphabetic maze or intellectual endurance contest!-Pr4ever (talk) 15:27, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Your JFKSWC award image is blurry
Hi Tony, Just wanted to let you know that the image you've posted on your user page is badly out of focus and needs to be redone. Keep up the great work. Sincerely, Rusty Dr. B. R. Lang (talk) 16:36, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Triple Crown
hi Tony. I saw your query about this on the DYK list. User talk:Durova handles the nominations.  Blnguyen  ( bananabucket ) 03:17, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

List of Hispanic Medal of Honor recipients
No problem, There is one rather large change I would like to make and that is to modify the list in to a table. Is that ok with you? This would make it like List of Korean War Medal of Honor recipients--Kumioko (talk) 12:33, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Puerto Rican Campaign‎
Hey Tony, I was thinking that perhaps we should merge all the campaign‎ into this article, instead of having a lot of stubs running around. Taking under consideration how brief the conflict was before Spain surrendered, we could produce quite a solid article, which is quite impressive if we consider that this was over in just a few days. The fact that we reduce the stub count by eight seems possitive as well, what do you think? -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  03:44, 29 July 2008 (UTC)


 * We will need to review the language of some of these stubs, the one covering the battle of Asomante is claiming that the American troops were "settled for the evening", which isn't accurate since the commander actually retreated after five of his officers were injured. There is also the fact that they don't mention the first battle at Asomante, which happened three days before and concluded with the first of two retreats. I will begin the mergers shortly, cheers. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  04:14, 29 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I have merged all the stubs exept Second Battle of San Juan (1898) into the article, this one seems to need less work and we could probably merge it after the other battles are improved. I have a book covering Asomante and Coamo, so expanding these two should be easy for me. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  05:12, 29 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I'll take Coamo and Asomante. We should probably avoid saying "The battle of..." in every sentence, switching to more fluid accounts by date, while incorporating the names somehow. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  06:13, 30 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah; Asomante has quite some information about it, I'll need to summarize half of the book, which should add a few thousand bytes. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  06:28, 31 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I will add the Asomante part tommorow. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  01:53, 2 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Are we missing something? The only think that I can think of is coverting the "Spanish preparations" section into a subsection of "Prelude to the Puerto Rican Campaign". -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  13:23, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I will try to tackle the lead tommorow. By the way, there is something funny with WP:MIL's template, the assessment is at "B", yet the template is displaying "Start", any idea why? -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  02:14, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm curious, why is Puerto Rican spelled with a dash in the headers? -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  22:29, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I think we are almost ready, the only thing that I noticed is that there is a sentence only saying "He therefore" in the "Landing at Guanica" section, where ref 8 and 7 are. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  22:52, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * You got mail, cheers. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  17:19, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Everything seems dandy to me. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  03:04, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Herman Bottcher
Tony, oustanding sir, I have been using wikipedia for a while but am going to register now. Thanks so much for your page and info on Herman Bottcher. We have many common intersections, I am an honorary Buriqua! and served as a Corpsman with the US Marines 1983-97. I had the privilage of working with an US Army reserve unit from Puerto Rico in 2003 at the begining of Iraqi Freedom as they were guarding the Merchant ship I was working on-from Taxas to Kuwait. That's another story.

I am facinated with Puerto Rician culture and history.

I am also working on biography of Herman Bottcher now, I live in San Francisco and am trying to piece together his life here before WW II. Stephen "esteban" Martin

Missionpurisima@yahoo.com 63.199.81.30 (talk) 23:33, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Sigma
Hi Tony, I was wondering if you could take a look at Fraternidad Fi Sigma Alfa and give me some tips on what else can be donde to improve the article, any help will be apriciated. Thanks in advance El Grande Johnson (talk) 22:36, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

¡Hola Tony!
Hi there. It is only to say hello. It was a calm and quiet day in Caracas with not much to report. I wait everything is fine with you and hope the week have been full of fun things for you. Un saludo fraterno. MusiCitizen (talk) 16:22, 31 July 2008 (UTC).

Second Battle of San Juan
This battle was not part of any larger battle for san juan. There were three distinct naval battles at san juan each by different forces. A large fleet bombarded the city in the first battle, the second battle was quite a bit later and consisted of a spanish sortie against a blockade ship, the third battle consisted of a blockade ship attacking a blockade runner and then being repulsed near the city by heavier spanish vessels. It is my intention to complete and expand all three article and i dont really see the need for them all to be lumped into a few lines in a paragraph in a campaign article. By doing so you are cutting out the details of each battle and only listing a minute iota of information when really there is much more to be told. User:XavierGreen —Preceding undated comment was added at 02:18, 1 August 2008 (UTC)