User talk:Marine 69-71/Archive 35

Happy New Year
Hey Tony - Happy New Year! I've spent the last four with my neighbors in my building, and I don't think I ever told you but it is 80% Puerto Rican. We're all very close. I thought you might enjoy the video I shot of them here in Loisaida as the ball dropped :-) Such good people! -- David  Shankbone  23:22, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi - something seems fishy here...
Please check THIS out. Something seems wrong. Thx, Mercy11 (talk) 02:32, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

List of Puerto Ricans
Hi. There is a "Sophy" singer that's listed, and I know there exists a Puerto Rican singer by that name. However, the wikilink is pointing to some other article. Maybe you know the name of the article it should be pointing to. Thanks, Mercy11 (talk) 04:04, 5 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Decorative, hum? Though I disagree - with them that is, not you - how about if I instead created a gallery at the bottom of the list? Would that pass musterd??? Thanks for helping focus my energies/time!!! Also, check out [THIS] edit and tell me if you agree. Regards, Mercy11 (talk) 18:03, 5 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Worked on Ferre, the one you pointed out and others. however, I'm sitting on the fence on kajak and lavoe. What do you think - if in doubt include them too? Mercy11 (talk) 00:33, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

You will like this one!
Ha! I'm telling you, there is of late a frenzy to delete photos and graphics used in PR project related articles. In this case the article that uses the image even passed musterd as GA years ago!!! Check it out HERE Mercy11 (talk) 00:42, 6 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Ha! I am telling you !!! Mercy11 (talk) 21:13, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Again? Man, I'm done uploading images here. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  07:13, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

HA! and check out these 2 -- Sila and, and probably several more to include ALL governors. I thought there was a duly executed OTRS (or whatever that's called) for all of these. I don't know how to work with those OTRS but believe Caribbean and you do. Help!!! Regards, Mercy11 (talk) 20:46, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The problem with the people at commons is that they have the damn habit of nominating images for deletion without having the common courtesey and sense of notifing the original uploader and per se, as in these cases, the Puerto Rican community. Therefore, the community is denied the right to voice their own opinon and are denied the oppurtunity to fix whatever needs fixin in the image in order to rescue them from deletion. Something must be done. That is way I do not wish to have any of my images nor those that I upload, placed in commons. Tony the Marine (talk) 00:55, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks. That being the case I will not upload anything else to Commons anymore and will upload to the English site only instead. Regards, Mercy11 (talk) 02:25, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, to avoid that, keep the images in your watchlists. There are users that enjoy sticking Template:Copy to Wikimedia Commons to these OTRS images, and they are often uploaded there without adding a link to the ticket. It may be better to simply remove the templates once they are placed, before they are deleted and moved to Commons. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  23:35, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks for the tips! Currently I have to log into English Wikipedia and separately into Commons to see what is going on there with files that I upload. Mercy11 (talk) 00:51, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

David Zayas
Hi Marine. I was reviewing pages that might remain indefinitely fully protected where that protection might not be necessary or where it's inadvertant. This edit seems to suggest that you intended to unprotect the page as there's consensus about the cause of an edit-war as the result of a discussion on a talk page. I wasn't sure if you're aware that the page was still indefinitely fully protected, so I thought I'd bring it up here. Just an FYI. Hope all is well! -- Gnowor TC 16:58, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * As it looks like you've been away from WP for a day or so, I'm going to move this to WP:RFPP, as I believe the edit cited above makes this fairly uncontroversial. I apologize in advance if that's incorrect. -- Gnowor TC 16:35, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Territorial AGs
You may want to take a look at my comment at Template talk:U.S. state attorneys general‎ Pr4ever (talk) 03:12, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Request admin move
Hey Tony, you've offered to make admin-only moves over redirects before, so I want to capitalize on that. I'd like you to move Department of the Air Force to United States Department of the Air Force to reflect its full name (and disambig with other nations, per the precedence of other US executive department articles); the latter currently redirects to United States Air Force.  bahamut0013  words deeds 21:14, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, I've put a notice up there, but I don't expect it to be controversial, so please check pack in a week.  bahamut0013  words deeds 20:23, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Seems someone thoughtlessly redirected it. I've restored it. Please go ahead and move it.  bahamut0013  words deeds 21:12, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks.  bahamut0013  words deeds 19:45, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Got another for you. A good-faith move of HMH-772 to Marine Heavy Helicopter Squadron 772 broke a naming convention for aircraft squadrons (see Category:United States Marine Corps helicopter squadrons). Rightly or wrongly, the convention exists, and we should either keep them all abbreviated or move them all, but not simply one.  bahamut0013  words deeds 23:07, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I took care of it now.  bahamut0013  words deeds 17:10, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

My friend
Hello. The article about the Centro del Sur mall is being nominated for deletion. You may wish to particpate in the discussion taking place HERE. Regards, Mercy11 (talk) 23:19, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

List of Puerto Ricans
Thsnks, I've tried getting a consensus to rename all the "List of People" articles before, but failed. If we do change this, what about the List of German Americans and other List of People articles. They all suffer from the same problem. Feed back  ☎ 12:08, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Tony
I hope everything is well. You have made this place something that all Puerto Ricans can be proud of. Como alguien dijo hace muchos años atras, "El puertorriqueño no tiene nada que envidiarle a nadie" refieriendose a las carreteras. OK, I just wanted to share THIS pic with you. I noticed there is no pic of this Spanish-times governor in List of Governors of Puerto Rico. Regards, Mercy11 (talk) 23:59, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Hola amigo
You may want to check this out. Thanks. Mercy11 (talk) 00:26, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Did you know? - Puerto Rico listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Did you know? - Puerto Rico. Since you had some involvement with the ''Did you know? - Puerto Rico'' redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). -- Cirt (talk) 01:50, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Felicidades!
Happy birthday Tony, espero que cumplas muchos mas! El Johnson (talk) 19:53, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

3rd Civil Affairs Group
Would you mind chiming in here on the Talk Page? I asked for this page to be protected because of an edit war & your honest comment one way or the other would be appreciated. It starts at the Combined Joint Task Force - Consequence Management section. Thanks & hope you are doing well! FieldMarine (talk) 13:37, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Hola amigo
¡Feliz cumpleaños! (late but early!!!) When you have free time at home, please take a look at this portal: http://www.prpop.org/biografias/ MusiCitizen (talk) 14:55, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Puerto Rican nationalism research
Hi Tony, hope all is well. I'm doing some research for a college paper on Puerto Rico between 1897 and 1935. I was wondering if you could recommend some English language sources I could read for information on some of the fascinating articles like Antonio Mattei Lluberas and Intentona de Yauco. Thanks for your help. Andrevan@ 12:15, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

⁄⁄⁄¡Unjú!
I've noticed that, in addition to trying to delete your bio, attempts are being made to delete other articles that mention you, such as my article on the Association of Naval Service Officers (ANSO), which I developed. I'm sure that ANSO's link to you has nothing to do with attempts to delete it. ¡Unjú! Pr4ever (talk) 01:58, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

ANI thread
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ScottyBerg (talk) 21:57, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Marine 69-71/Tony Santiago
User:Marine 69-71/Tony Santiago, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Marine 69-71/Tony Santiago and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Marine 69-71/Tony Santiago during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Damiens .rf 15:11, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi, Tony. In the process of backing up your Wiki-bio, you've lost the article's history, what's unfair with all involved contributors (it's a copyright infringement, actually). And in any case, don't you believe it's inappropriate to keep a copy of a deleted article hosted on Wikipedia? It may give some readers a wrong impression. Thanks! --Damiens .rf 15:22, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:FlagofJuncos .jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FlagofJuncos .jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:55, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Maxwell (musician)
It has been over 1 year. Please unlock Maxwell (musician). Thank You. 69.140.66.37 (talk) 23:45, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Greetings
By adding this greeting, I am making my 100,000th edit in WP. I can only honor one editor in that fashion, so you know how greatly I appreciate all your hard work, kind words and the skills you have built up. You haven't sent many requests for proofreading lately, so I had to check your user contributions to see if you're still kicking. I interpret the lack of requests as a sign of an editor whose quality stands on its own, but I'm here if you ever need support. Keep in touch, and happy editing! Chris the speller  yack  16:29, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Just wanted to say "Hi" and this seemed like the right thread.

Enjoy the weekend, Marine. SamEV (talk) 20:58, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Welcome Back
Can you move Galería Comercial to Paradise (Old San Juan)? Galería Comericial is no longer active and operating under a new brand name: Paradise Old San Juan. Same owner. This will be my second wikipedia article for the Puerto Rico Project under your surveillance. Thanks Quazgaa, hope your are doing cool. (Wire and Plastic Products (talk) 19:14, 10 April 2011 (UTC))

Just a heads up
Hi, Tony. I'm so sorry that you are unwell. :( I hope you'll have a rapid and complete recovery. I really don't want to be the bearer of bad news at this time in particular, but per our attorney there is a bit of a problem with the release behind Template:PD-PRGov-IPC. I'll make a note at the template's talk page and see if I can get some assistance from the folks at WP:MCQ. I really don't want to burden you, and struggled with whether to say anything at all once I saw your notice, but not saying anything would seem unbearably rude. Sorry! My best wishes are with you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:21, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi, Tony. I'm not dropping the template on your page, but just wanted to let you know that File:Juano Hernandez.jpg is at PuF, here. Hopefully, we'll be able to determine enough about the origin of the picture to retain it, but I'm happy to say that an image of the gentleman that can be proven to be free has been located by User:ScottyBerg, so the articles will not lack for pictures. :) Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:51, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * It's Official! The lawyers are taking project control.  Wikipedia probably should no longer be called a project. Maybe just The Foundation, in capital letters, especially since a single person (the Foundation Attorney) can decide matters at his/her convenience.   What happened to Community Consensus?  Is there a Consensus of Attorneys?  IMHO, the attorneys should Defend the Consensus, not change it.  This is why I no longer actively contribute to The Foundation.  It has grown from a project to a bureaucracy.   QuAz  GaA  17:56, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Community consensus has never held sway on copyright concerns. Please see WP:CONEXCEPT. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:12, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Notice
Tomorrow, I will be undergoing a double bypass surgery and I am currently hospitalized, therefore I will not be able to attend to Wikipedia matters for the time being. Any concerns regarding Wikipedia should be forwarded to another administrator. Will be back soon (I hope). Tony the Marine (talk) 00:14, 11 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Dear Tony: I hope everything turns out alright at what has now become an almost routine procedure.  After the surgery, take a break and recover your strength for many more years of Wikipedia contributions.  You have changed the world of many, including myself! Pr4ever (talk) 10:22, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Tony, best of luck with your recovery. I originally came to this take page to discuss the details of one of your edits with you but it can definitely wait. When you return to editing and settle back in, feel free to contact me (it related to this). But nothing urgent at all, definitely not urgent enough to interject itself into your recovery, so definitely no rush. Again, best wishes, Daniel (talk) 09:00, 14 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Tony, I know the best thing I could do for you is help carry on your excellent work here while you recover and will see after articles you usually contributed to. I wish you a speedy recovery, though: no one could fill your shoes as good as yourself! Best wishes, Mercy11 (talk) 02:56, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I wish I had the time, the knowledge or the skill you have to look after Tony's Wikipedia legacy while he recovers. As an admirer and mentoree of Tony's, thanks!  And, Tony, please let us know how you're doing.  God bless. Pr4ever (talk) 12:46, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Hope you're doing well! Pr4ever (talk) 11:06, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Tony, I've noticed that you're editing again, so I guess everything turned out alright. Welcome back. Pr4ever (talk) 21:46, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Alcazar de Colon
You have upload an image to commons called File:Alcazar de Colon2.jpg and I think that might be helpful to know wich year was the picture taken. Thanks Oscar 15:59, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * When you say "around" means you really do not know, right. Oscar 19:28, 2 May 2011 (UTC)


 * When I say "around", I mean that I do "not" nor did I at the time keep a travel log on my travels. My eldest son was about ten when we visited the Dominican Republic which would have been "around" 1982. That is all I have to say on the picture which I took and which I am sharing with others in Wikipedia. Take care. Tony the Marine (talk) 21:37, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Ambiguous copyright status
Hi, Marine. This image has ambiguous copyright information. Is says it's in the public domain but also that you are the copyright holder. Which one is true? --Damiens .rf 23:54, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Very true, my mistake. Copyright holder US Army, will fix. Tony the Marine (talk) 00:54, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Jose de Diego 2.jpg
Something one of the participants in the got me looking in a different area and it turns out the image you uploaded is cropped from one which was published at least in 1904, so it is correctly tagged. If you were interested in copies of the full image, I've found them at http://books.google.com/books?id=_n5DAAAAYAAJ&pg=PP11#v=onepage&q&f=false and http://www.loc.gov/rr/hispanic/1898/diego.html and there are plenty of other versions of varying quality and crops around the internet, but there's no problem retaining the one you have now if you like it. Thought you'd like to know. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:02, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Todo a su Tiempo (Marc Anthony album)
Hola Tony! I just worked on Todo a su Tiempo (Marc Anthony album) and wanted you to take a look at it. Sometime down the road, I have plans of continuing to work on Contra La Corriente for Puerto Rico's first FA album. Magiciandude (talk) 04:26, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Gracias. I'm always glad to help out with my Puerto Rican members. I'm proud of my heritage and gladly listen to music of Puerto Rico. Don't know if you saw this on the PR talk page, but I managed to get a picture of me and El Gran Combo member Jerry Rivas after a festival in Orlando. Magiciandude (talk) 04:45, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Federico Fernández Cavada
Materialscientist (talk) 09:04, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Adolfo Fernández Cavada
Materialscientist (talk) 09:04, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Happy Memorial Day
Glad to see you back. Hope you wre feeling great. It's good to have great people like you editing Wikipedia. Hope your computer issues have also been resolved (if not we might need to make a 'serrucho' to send you one - haha!!!) Have a great weekend! Mercy11 (talk) 02:11, 26 May 2011 (UTC)


 * My friend, hope you'll have a grrrreat weekend. Ah, and don't worry about "those editors": you are at a higher level than they. They've got a mental case. It's exhibited by folks who are such losers that the only way they know to improve their misery relative to others is to try to lower the status, dignity, peace or equilibrium of those they come in contact with. Unfortunately Wikipedia is like a public highway: you drive alonside mostly descent, respectaful and respectable people, but also alonside some morons, jerks, and the plain insane. Just -- as you have so brilliantly done repeatedly before -- don't lower yourself to their level and you will always be the winner. Regards, Mercy11 (talk) 00:11, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Felicita and Gonzalo.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Felicita and Gonzalo.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Damiens .rf 20:54, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Dear Tony
I really hope you feel better real soon. Nothing is worse than being sick in the spring for a nice guy like you.

May you always have work for your hands to do.

May your pockets hold always a coin or two.

May the sun shine bright on your windowpane.

May the rainbow be certain to follow each rain.

May the hand of a friend always be near you.

And may God fill your heart with gladness to cheer you.

~Irish Blessing

Sincerely, MusiCitizen (talk) 14:04, 27 May 2011 (UTC).

DYK for Lola Sanchez (Confederate spy)
The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Hi Tony
I appreciate your message. All in all, the requested moves page has not been slow for me in the past. But I will take your offer into account. Are you really a marine? --Againme (talk) 14:02, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello
Do you know anything about Leoncio Rivera or Pedro Segundo? I understand they participated in the Grito de Lares and suferred prison time at the Antiguo Cuartel Militar Español de Ponce which is now a school. The place was also home to Roman Baldorioty de Castro for some time starting in October 1887 due to his liberal ideas.

It's a goldmine: Remember Julio Pinto Gandia (who, with Gilberto Concepcion de Gracia, took the case of PR before the UN, claiming that "Puerto Ricans should have the right to a consultation before being sent to any war")? The fellow (Pinto) had spent time in the same prison as a result of the 1937 Ponce Massacre together with Casimiro Berenguer and others.

Was wondering if you knew anything about these first 2 fellows. Regards, Mercy11 (talk) 19:32, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank u for ur response. Speaking of women, Maria de las Mercedes Barbudo is recognized as the Primera Mujer Independentista Puertorriqueña. I looked for a wiki article on her but found none. There isn't very much info on her, and this will really a research project, especially since she lived in the late 1700s and early 1800s. Regards, Mercy11 (talk) 01:01, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Jaja on Barbudo - I would had written it, but you will probably beat me to it. I am sure you will do a better job than me anyway. Will try to get her pic if you can't find one. As for the language, don't worry any offendees - they are just jealous you and I and the others are bilingual, and they are not, for they are only just "Americans". (As the joke goes, if you speak 3 languages you are trilingual, 2 languages and you are builingual, one lnaguage and you are American -- hee hee)... Ademas, si hasta de Jesucristo se ofenden algunos y que hasta lo crucificaron, por que no de nosotros pobres mortales... Regards, Mercy11 (talk) 13:04, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Ambrosio José Gonzales
Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for John Jackson Dickison
Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Congrats
This is a nice drawing and you should do that more often. Congrats, --damiens.rf 21:03, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

John Leguizamo
In this video, he clearly states he is PR. --XLR8TION (talk) 16:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for María de las Mercedes Barbudo
Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Edward G. Miller
Tony, shouldn't he be placed in the "Diplomats" section, rather than "Politicians" in the List of Puerto Ricans? In his bio there isn't even a reference to his political affiliation. Being Asst Sec of State is more diplomatic than political. Pr4ever (talk) 15:39, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Barea
As usual, your sabiduría helps solve virtually any problem! Thanks. Pr4ever (talk) 02:53, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Tag team revert-and-protect
Hi, Marine. It was wrong for you and your son to tag team and protect and article right after reverting it to your preferred version.

Please undo that ASAP and, if you really found it necessary, ask for someone else to protect it. --damiens.rf 11:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * You seem to have misunderstood my intentions, of which I do not blame you. There was not nor there is any "tag team" attempt here. What happened was that he (my son) messed up in his "protection" attempt and what I tried to do is fix it right, that is all. Tony the Marine (talk) 2:45 pm, Today (UTC−3)


 * Whatever. But please, unlock it already. --<span class="I_STALK_DAMIENS">damiens.rf 17:49, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't really get it. What were the "constant removal of content" you mentioned when you reprotected it on June 27--<span class="I_STALK_DAMIENS">damiens.rf 17:52, 27 June 2011 (UTC)?


 * Yes, can you please explain this use of your tools? Was it vandalism? I see no edit warring. You protected a page for three months in which you and your sons are regular editors, evidently because somebody removed a photo from a photo array in the infobox. Am I missing something? ScottyBerg (talk) 18:26, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * There was vandalism involved when you remove an entire section. Talking about "Tag teamimng" it seems to me that you and Damiens pop up together quite often when it referrers to me. Why is that? Can you explain? Tony the Marine (talk) 18:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Can you please provide diffs at to the "vandalism," as I am not seeing it. It looks to me like a content dispute. To answer your question, I have had your page watchlisted since posting this question asking whether you would refrain from editing articles in which you are mentioned. You never responded to that question and removed it. ScottyBerg (talk) 18:47, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I checked what you call "vandalism." Another user removed content to the talk page. I have no idea whether he or you were right or wrong, but this is a content dispute, not driveby vandalism. Besides, that happened on June 3! I am flabbergasted that you would impose a three-month page protection on an article in which you are involved in a circumstance like that. I agree that you should unprotect the page, and if there are future problems you should not use your tools in this manner, but ask for help from an uninvolved administrator. ScottyBerg (talk) 18:53, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Come on, I don't want you to be flabbergasted. I will unprotect that article as requested, but let me make myself clear, the removal of content is vandalism and I am not going to stand for it. It was ridiculous for the editor to post the whole section in a talk page. The talk page, as you should know, is for the discussion of improvements to an article not of the posting of an entire section with the intention of making a ridiculous claim. Thank you for your advice, but I know how and when to use the so-called tools and will use them whenever there is vandalism involved. I'm trying to stay clear of some issues here since my heart surgery, but people continue to drag me in. Tony the Marine (talk) 19:07, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * The editor removed a list that was smack in the middle of a non-list article. People remove sections all the time, and in this case, after reviewing this edit, I think that this was a good-faith edit. Not saying he was right, but it was definitely not vandalism. That's just not so. ScottyBerg (talk) 20:50, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Marine, that edit was clearly not Vandalism. It was a content dispute. The user wondered why an article about Irish immigration to Puerto Rico would contain a list of Puerto Ricans of Irish descent. This is a valid concern that one may reasonably agree with or not.
 * The editor also removed the name of Victoria Justice from the infobox, what's what a completely valid edit to do since this girls has nothing to do with Irish Immigration to PR. She's born in Florida and has never lived in PR. You reverted that as vandalism!
 * The user event started a discussion on the talk page about the edit, but you guys preferred to revert it back to your preferred version and protect the article, what's a completely unacceptable use of the tools.
 * Try to be more collaborative next time. Remember you don't own the articles you create.
 * This is a last call. Unprotect the article. --<span class="I_STALK_DAMIENS">damiens.rf  19:32, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * As I stated I will unprotect the article, but let me tell you, I am perfectly aware that we go not own the articles which we create. You are wrong in stating that it was a content dispute, that what the talk page is for, removing of content without a proper discussion, just because we feel like it, is vandalism. I think that being in Wikipedia as long as I have been I am quite aware of that. But, I will tell you this, I will use my tools to revert vandalism from any article regardless of who wrote it. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:37, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * (ec)Tony, I think that you know perfectly well that the removal of content is not necessarily vandalism, and I am even more flabbergasted that you are continuing to push this point when you are clearly wrong. You had a content dispute with one other editor (Varlaam), an established editor, not a "vandal." If he is a vandal, why didn't you block him? Why didn't you even warn him for his "vandalism"? ScottyBerg (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I am not pushing the point as this page is my witness, I did not invite you or anybody to this conversation, so who is pushing what? I stand by what I believe is right. I already stated that I will unprotect the article. Let me tell you something in case you don't know it, I am not about to go around blocking every editor who unknowning or knowing commits an act of vandalism or just simply removes content. It wasn't the first time that the editor involved had been informed through the edit summary before. In case you didn't know, sometimes a protection of an article will serve as a cooling off period with the intention that the editors involved will reflect on their actions. Tony the Marine (talk) 21:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Next time you guys use protection as a "cooling off period", do not revert to your preferred version before.
 * And no, that was not vandalism. You should had a better judgment to deserve these tools. --<span class="I_STALK_DAMIENS">damiens.rf 21:27, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Fine! Let's end this conversation. Tony the Marine (talk) 21:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Not just yet. Are you going to use your tools in this article in the future? I ask because, in reviewing that article, I find that the edit removing Victoria Justice's photo was not only not vandalism but was justified. You need to step away from that article, Tony, and perhaps also stop using your tools, period. ScottyBerg (talk) 22:07, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * The issue was not so much the removal of the image of Victoria Justice, who is of both Puerto Rican and Irish descent. As stated many, many times before, the issue was the removal of an entire section from the article. I will use my tools when merited and justified. Tony the Marine (talk) 22:16, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Varlaan's removal of Victoria Justice's photo was reverted by you, and that was followed by your son AntonioMartin and then you fully protecting the article for three months, on the specious grounds of "content removal." She is of Puerto Rican and Irish descent, but nothing in the article about her connects her to "Irish immigration to Puerto Rico." Thus removal of the photo was correct. The reason I'm pursuing this is that the following happened in this article: 1)The photo was properly removed by Varlaan. 2)You reverted it. 3)AntonioMartin and then you, both involved editors, improperly issued a full protection of the article for a period of three months, contrary to policy (WP:PROTECT). That's why I asked if you are going to continue to use your tools in this article. If your answer is "yes," then I don't see this as being resolved, since you insist that you were right when you clearly were not. ScottyBerg (talk) 22:27, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I have never admitted to being 100% "right", I believe that I was right, but that doesn't mean that I was was. I'm not perfect, are you? I can make a mistake, but I believe that I was right. Now, you can not pretend that I am not going to use use my tools on any article that I have created if I come across a vandal. I will use my tools when I believe that the situation merits it and when I believe there is a justification for it. Look, for some reason to unknown me, you seem to hate me, you have been on my case for a long time, therefore I am not interested in conversing anymore with you. Tony the Marine (talk) 23:10, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Are you serious? You're a Wikipedia administrator, and I'm asking you not to abuse your tools. This is really bizarre. You don't seem to have the slightest idea how serious it is to use your tools in a content dispute in which you are personally involved. Your repeatedly calling it "vandalism" when it clearly was not, combined with this bizarre "you hate me" rhetoric, is beginning to erode my belief that you are acting in good faith. ScottyBerg (talk) 23:32, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * FYI, just to be sure that we are on the same page, here is how policy defines vandalism: "Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. Examples of typical vandalism are adding irrelevant obscenities and crude humor to a page, illegitimately blanking pages, and inserting patent nonsense into a page. . . Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism." That couldn't be clearer. ScottyBerg (talk) 14:03, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:SS Euripides Rubio jpg.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:SS Euripides Rubio jpg.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. <span class="I_STALK_DAMIENS">damiens.rf 12:59, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

File:JA y A.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JA y A.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. <span class="I_STALK_DAMIENS">damiens.rf 19:45, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Marine, what was the point of uploading an image that has just been nominated for deletion on commons? Can we trust what you post as the image's source? --<span class="I_STALK_DAMIENS">damiens.rf 19:46, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The point is this: While it is true that the first image will most likely be deleted because it come from a "Blog" regardless of the fact that the blog is a blog owned by the school named after the subject. The new upload comes from the "Colecciones Puertorriqueñas"; by: Cesáreo Rosa Nieves y Esther M. Melón: Biografías; Ediciones México, 1985 in which it is stated that the image is c.1800. that is the point. Tony the Marine (talk) 21:05, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Unblock request on my page
If the IP user is indeed Nelson Antonio Denis, then the answer is, "No," because his only activities on this project appear to have been to violate WP:BLP, WP:SOCK, and WP:COI, in an effort to harass Adam Clayton Powell IV online. Wikipedia does not countenance such crimes, and for that reason, the indef block was reasonable and necessary. I met the former member of the assembly once, but have no other relationship with any one of the five Adam Clayton Powells. A few of the students at my college had interned for him. Bearian (talk) 22:07, 28 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your message. I believe that you being the "Blocking" administrator, that it is your call. I'm sure that you both can continue a civil conversation on the topic as you have up until now and come to an understanding. Take care. Tony the Marine (talk) 22:18, 28 June 2011 (UTC)