User talk:MarioGom/Archive 4

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Universal suffrage&#32; on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 17:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive
(t &#183; c)  buidhe  21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red October 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Trickle-down economics&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 14:30, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Microfrontend
Hi, I saw you draftified this. I'd like to request you move it back to mainspace and AFD it if you do not think it is notable. I rescued it and moved it to its present name and added references, and I believe it is a notable industry term. Andre🚐 17:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Ok. I draftified because it was created as part of a spam spree (see Special:Permalink/1116221223). I removed the spam part from the article. Best, MarioGom (talk) 18:43, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks. Andre🚐 19:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022
Hello , Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to ), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also. Software news: and  have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved. Suggestions:
 * There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
 * Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
 * Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
 * This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog: Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!


 * Reminders
 * Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
 * If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
 * Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Women in Red November 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Concern regarding Draft:Renu Kumari
Hello, MarioGom. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Renu Kumari, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:54, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Stacey Abrams&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 01:31, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Language and linguistics request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:2022 Morbi bridge collapse&#32; on a "Language and linguistics" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 13:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Mary, Queen of Scots&#32; on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 15:31, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Asturiana de Zinc
Hello, MarioGom. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Asturiana de Zinc, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red in December 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:55, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Donald Trump&#32; on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 17:31, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

SPI
I am not yet autoconfirmed on meta-wiki, so I am not able to request global locks myself, but could you also request a global lock for, per the SPI results? has been globally locked for cross-wiki abuse multiple times, and is now evading this lock. Among Us for POTUS (talk) 19:56, 8 December 2022 (UTC)


 * ✅. Thanks. MarioGom (talk) 20:39, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Adding sock templates
I used the spihelper.js script to add sock templates to the accounts under Sockpuppet_investigations/Join_Instagram_at_Under_13/Archive. Am I not supposed to do this? The script let me, but I'm not sure if only clerks are allowed to add tags. Among Us for POTUS (talk) 17:33, 9 December 2022 (UTC)


 * See Sockpuppeteer: In general, this template should only be used by Administrators or Clerks as part of the Sockpuppet investigations process. Please, don't do it. And in particular, do not override tags added by CUs or clerks. Thanks. MarioGom (talk) 17:38, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay, I see. Sorry about that. Among Us for POTUS (talk) 17:38, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I will go and revert the ones I overwrote. Among Us for POTUS (talk) 17:38, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I reverted all the sock tags I added, and the user pages/categories that I created to add sock tags to have all been deleted (I tagged them for speedy deletion and they are gone now). I think this should fix it. Among Us for POTUS (talk) 18:11, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. MarioGom (talk) 18:13, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

FWKTZS created a new account
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/FWKTZS

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/FWKTZS456

Bamnamu (talk) 00:40, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Armenian student project
Thanks for clarifying the situation. Unfortunately, the large majority of the edits made by those students were counter-productive. I wish teachers would give better guidance to their students before sending them on wikipedia. Best, --LK (talk) 07:03, 12 December 2022 (UTC)


 * If they continue to be disruptive, some WikiEdu instructor might be able to help. Otherwise, other venues to report disruptive editing will work better than SPI. Best, MarioGom (talk) 13:00, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Well noted. I believed it was just one person, who was possibly banned before, which is why I took it to SPI.  Best, --LK (talk) 04:03, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Führer&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 22:30, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Unproductive and unjustified actions are not good reviews
Dear @MarioGom I see you doing a lot on the Reviewer's side and that is admirable. I would love if you would maybe also do it with more care and focus on specifies of content like Mobilizon. For example you make claim about that article needs reliable sources, which is very generic statement, that anyone can agree with, but provide zero evidence to why any of the existing sources are unreliable or what content part is not covered? Do you find one of the leading and 40 year old publication PC Mag unreliable? ChaosComputerCongres as longest and biggest standing hacking event? The French NextINpact? Swiss LeCourrier? Without listing specific feedback it feels like you might be focusing on just getting more reviewer action, rather then being constructive and supportive. You did not even noticed that Mobilizon is not an organization, so sending me the link to WP:NCORP is totally out of place. I can imagine around NYE many of us are not fully focused so I will drop it, but please do not send translated articles to Draft space, just because sources are not understood by you and also without very specific feedback on what you criticize. This kind of situations reads as toxic and makes new Wikipedians turn away from contributing at the expanse of quantity of bad or mediocre review work. Have a wonderful 2023 and thank you for work! --Zblace (talk) 06:34, 2 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello! I'm sorry the dractification came across as unjustified. Note that an article being translated does not make any difference in terms of review, except that it needs to be checked for attribution. At the time I draftified, the article had 10 sources. Most of them were links to Mobilizon or Framablog, which are not independent. Others were primary sources, such as events.open-society.ch. The NextINpact source is routine coverage with 2 paragraphs what are direct quotes from Framasoft and a couple of lines more. When considering notability criteria, this does not count as significant or independent at all. The Agilap article does not even mention Mobilizon. These sources barely support any notability, so I don't see how draftification was unjustified.Anyway, I see you added a some additional sources now, including PC Mag (thank you!), and also that Onel marked the article as reviewed. Best, MarioGom (talk) 15:30, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran&#32; on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 14:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red in February 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Question
Hello. I don't think we have ever spoken before, but I know that you are an editor who takes part at SPI. I have a question about SPI.

Suppose an account has 82 edits since 2015 and no edits since 13 October 2021, more than a year ago. Suppose the account received an echo notification from a talk page on 28 January 2023 and showed up on the talk page 17 hours later (despite having not edited for more than a year). Suppose the account that sent the echo notification made 450+ edits in 2009 (including 340+ in August 2009) and virtually no edits till 170+ edits from 27 January 2023.

Is it likely that someone would keep the password of an account with a few hundred edits during fourteen years of inactivity (instead of getting a new account under COMPSOCK)? Is likely that someone would login to their account every day for more than a year despite making no edits?

I assume that the behaviour in the second question is very unlikely, but I don't have enough experience to make a judgement call. James500 (talk) 21:22, 1 February 2023 (UTC)


 * I have no idea about what your observations of echo notifications mean. To all your questions: yes, I guess it's possible. MarioGom (talk) 22:21, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Byzantine Empire&#32; on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 18:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Helms Amendment to the Foreign Assistance Act&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 04:30, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023
Hello , The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day. won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!
 * Backlog
 * 2022 Awards

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from  to  '''

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as and  have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.


 * Reminders
 * Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
 * There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
 * Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Second opinion
Hi @MarioGom. Thanks for your helpful reply in NPP talk page. Going off of what you said, and in an effort to cool down a particular exchange, I was wondering if I could get a second pair of eyes on a review issue I've recently encountered. There is an editor who clearly seems passionate about a very specific architectural niche discussed in an article Silent Erasure: A Satellite Investigation of the Destruction of Armenian Heritage in Nakhchivan, Azerbaijan (https://indd.adobe.com/view/2a6c8a55-75b0-4c78-8932-dc798a9012fb). The topic is clearly both historically and culturally relevant, but the editor appears to be producing a lot of short articles on these individual buildings that, at least in some cases, might not pass WP:NBUILD. Here is an example to one I just tagged St. Hripsime Church (Kultepe); in the meantime, another one popped up: St. Tovma Monastery (Chalkhangala). More recently, a third building was draftified by a different reviewer. Judging by the tone of their reply to my initial feedback from page curation, I can tell that it would be beneficial to have someone else take a look at the subject more broadly, especially that a project of this scale might perhaps be better addressed by a separate list article that includes all of them and provides clear rationale for separate pages dedicated to specific buildings. I'd appreciate your input. Thanks so much! Ppt91 (talk) 22:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)


 * I'll have a look. MarioGom (talk) 10:33, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red March 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Question on SPI closure
I see you closed the SPI case I opened at Sockpuppet investigations/MarketingFlippa. If the accounts are obvious socks of an account blocked for promotional editing, shouldn't they have indefinite hard blocks as well? TornadoLGS (talk) 01:52, 3 March 2023 (UTC)


 * soft blocked FlippaMarketing on 28 February 2022 {{diff2|}1140448250}} with a message that indicated they could continue editing by requesting a rename or a creating a new account. They requested the rename 28 February 2022 . This request would have been granted if it was well-formatted. Then the user created a new account with a similar name to the one they requested, which was a valid action, and suggests there was no attempt to evade detection, but just following the given instructions.While there was a previous hard block to MarketingFlippa by on 28 October 2022, I chose to follow the most recent communication with the user (the soft block). There was obviously no detection evasion attempt between MarketingFlippa and FlippaMarketing creation either, so I assumed good faith and followed the least principle of least astonishment by not pulling a the block evasion card at this point, although doing so would also be ok according the policy. The current account, ToryFG, has a single uncontroversial edit , so we can just wait and see.Any admin can override my recommendation at SPI, and I pinged the previous blocking admins in this message, just in case they want to review the case. MarioGom (talk) 07:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * , I am not inclined to object if another administrator using good judgment wants to unblock someone that I have blocked. But I am a bit concerned about unblocking a person who has twice created accounts with "marketing" in their username. Does this editor clearly understand that all marketing activities are strictly forbidden on Wikipedia, and have they committed to refrain from all marketing, advertising, promotional and public relations activity on Wikipedia? Cullen328 (talk) 08:33, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * It's early to say, I posted another warning yesterday: . That being said, I won't object to a block either, if you'd prefer the user to use a block appeal rather than possibly ignoring warnings. Also note that there was no formal unblock, just 2 blocks, one hard, and one soft. MarioGom (talk) 15:42, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I was unaware of the other account when I made the soft block. I soft block because I felt the user was either a)editing about their company in draft space, which is allowed or b)making factual changes for their client, in either case I didn't feel the edits were "blatantly promotional".  I am fine with any action any other administrator deems appropriate.   78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 17:28, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I figured there was no intent to conceal that they were the same person or group, but I thought that creating a sock account to circumvent a block (a hard block in the case of MarketingFlippa) was a zero-tolerance matter, grounds for an immediate indefinite block (and it is listed at Zero tolerance). Also, while we may disagree, the language added in this pair of edits seems like a blatant advertisement to me. Portions of the text also appear copied from here. TornadoLGS (talk) 23:00, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Ugh... whelp, looks like I messed up on that one, either didn't read far enough, or missed that edit entirely. First person editing ("We help our community...") is just plain a pet peeve of mine.  Definitely should have hard blocked.   78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 23:36, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Gender imbalance per country
I just happened across WikiProject Women in Red/Gender imbalance per country. Where does the data on this come from? I assume it's some Wikidata query? I ask because I noticed it's about a year old now and I think it would be interesting to see the current numbers. Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 23:00, 9 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Yes, it comes from Wikidata queries. I'm running them again and I'll update them soon. Thanks for the heads up. MarioGom (talk) 07:02, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

SPI still in need of a move
This SPI still needs moving right? To avoid further confusion with Rajputbhatti ... Iskandar323 (talk) 16:55, 12 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Not really. I did a separate report for that: . The original report had one account that apparently was Jobas, so I did not move it. MarioGom (talk) 17:52, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Ah ok. Gottcha. Iskandar323 (talk) 18:30, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Need your help here
Hi, need your help here CrashLandingNew (talk) 11:00, 13 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I fixed the format of your report: Sockpuppet investigations/Naseeb2468. Now you should just wait until a clerk processes the case. MarioGom (talk) 13:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red April 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Njalla
I've removed this edit from Njalla. Looking for sources on the topic, from what I can tell, the ICANN controversy involves another registrar that Sunde had affiliations to called Sarek and not Njalla. If I'm wrong and you'd like to point me to something that shows otherwise, you can do so. --Dawnbails (talk) 21:57, 26 March 2023 (UTC)


 * It's been a while since I read this, but if I recall correctly, the controversy was related to Njalla since Peter Sunde disassociated from Njalla as a result, to avoid it affecting Njalla. MarioGom (talk) 15:55, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Page moved to draft
Hi MarioGom - I made a couple of edits to a page "Nick Savides" today and it looks like you made an edit to move it to "Draft:Nick Savides". The page has been live for several months now. What can I do to reinstate it? Thank you. Ver1tey (talk) 03:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello : I draftified the article because it was created for undisclosed payments. The article can be submitted for review by following the instructions in the banner under the "Draft article not currently submitted for review." header. Best, MarioGom (talk) 06:58, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you Ver1tey (talk) 17:15, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:New Zealand&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 11:40, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Two socks
Mario, I noticed your posts to and  and was wondering if you intended to file a report at SPI. I would block them based on behavior without an SPI, but I think a check to look for other accounts would be useful. I'm happy to file the SPI, but you're the one who spotted them.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:20, 16 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I'm not planning to report them. I noticed them but I didn't check if they were abusive enough for me to care. Feel free to proceed. MarioGom (talk) 16:40, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:31, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Your reports at SPI
Mario, lately I've noticed you filing a lot of reports at SPI. If you think users are socks, why don't you file as a clerk and ask an admin to impose whatever sanctions you think are appropriate? If you are not sure about the sock issue, why don't you make it clear that you are filing for more input, or for a check, or whatever? Not sure how other clerks feel about this. You could always ask at the SPI talk page and get more people's views.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:07, 17 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I sometimes self-endorse for CU, but I prefer another clerk or patrolling admin to double check for me. I always have a high degree of confidence in what I report. Otherwise I don't report it. Maybe I should go directly to request admin action... after all, the admin who imposes the block should do that double check anyway. MarioGom (talk) 16:12, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I have discussed it with some other clerks, who would also favor me being more explicit about wanting a second opinion. MarioGom (talk) 16:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * What I don't see is the difference between you evaluating someone else's report and making a finding and you making a finding in advance and filing your own report. That's why I think you "should go directly to request admin action". As for double-checking, I can't speak for other administrators, I make sure nothing weird stands out, but I don't verify your finding. If you were an admin clerk, you'd block; you're not, so you must request it, but it's your clerk status that gives you the authority. If you were an admin clerk, the only check would be before archiving, and that's usually just to make sure you, the closing clerk, did everything you said you would, like tags, etc.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:18, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * @Bbb23 I like Mario's philosophy of wanting another set of eyes to review their work, and encourage them to continue doing things they way they're doing it now. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:33, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Well, you have more authority than I do, but it makes no sense.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I get your point. I'll re-evaluate how I approach this, and I'll probably be more explicit going forward. For me, the thought process of assessing someone else's report is a bit different from investigations I initiate on my own. When I'm evaluating someone else's report, I start assuming it's bullshit. So there's some adversarial testing of evidence. I have a quite systematic methodology to behavioral evidence that I apply to both scenarios, but being adversarial to oneself is... not really the same. I guess this is just an involved way of saying that I feel more confident if I'm sanity-checked from time to time ;-) MarioGom (talk) 17:42, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * When I'm evaluating someone else's report, I start assuming it's bullshit. Fascinating; why? I find that all reports are different. Some filers do a good job, and some don't. I sometimes make presumptions based on the experience of the filer, but otherwise I take each one as it comes.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:57, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Not all of them are the same, report quality varies a lot, but very often they are weak. And even if they look strong, I try to challenge the assumptions of the report. When I'm looking for socks on my own, I look for some very specific cues. While these initial cues can be pretty strong, there's some risk of confirmation bias as I go onto the next stages (gathering evidence, and then testing whether it could be spurious). Whether these differences play a significant role in the end result or not is probably something that an external observer is better equipped to judge. MarioGom (talk) 18:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Chiming in: while I get your point of view, I think I wrote in an essay I have on cuwiki something along the lines of SPI isn't a court, suspected accounts don't have due process rights, and the standard of proof isn't beyond a reasonable doubt.The standard for a sock block is the same as any other block on Wikipedia: is the account causing disruption to the project. If its more likely than not that they're the same user and they're violating policy, or even if its just possible and they're behaving in the exact same manner that got a previous user blocked and it is disruptive, a block can be justified.All that to say, I wouldn't start with the assumption every report is BS. There are some users who are much better at spotting socks than others, there are some accounts which are obviously socks on their face, and then there are people who file vindictive SPIs against people who are their enemies but not socking, and others where people file stupid reports against someone who forgot a password 12 years ago. The context of the report is what should drive the level of skepticism something receives. If a CU on another project files an SPI on en.wiki, and they say its been blocked on a different project, I'm extremely likely to believe them and run a check on it. That's a part of the context, and I shouldn't start by assuming they're wrong. TonyBallioni (talk) 06:25, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Absolutely. I agree with this, and I have seen instances of the various classes of reports you mention. MarioGom (talk) 10:44, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I always assumed that filing and not actioning cases was implicitly asking for a second opinion. I don't have a problem with that, but I almost never do it myself, because I don't file anything that I'm not confident merits either a block or a check. I've only done it twice that I can remember - in both cases the suspected socks were tenured users with tens of thousands of edits, and my asking for a second opinion wasn't because I wasn't sure they were socks, but to back up my evidence in case they appealed the block.I wouldn't assume that cases are bullshit by default - I actually think that most cases have some merit, but many filers are bad at presenting evidence in a clear and convincing manner. I often ignore the filing and just look at the accounts myself. My standard for blocking is: does this look like the same person to me, and is the evidence strong enough to convince other admins of it? Like Tony mentioned, the overall behaviour of the accounts matters too. I have a lower threshold for sock-blocking someone who's clearly a spammer, for example, because they'll probably end up getting indeffed at some point anyway. Spicy (talk) 07:29, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * My bullshit assumption comment was not the smartest thing for me to say. I understand, and generally share, the points Tony, Bbb23 and you are making (about context, SPI not being a court, etc). My previous comments were just a rough explanation of the thought process I have followed so far when filing cases myself, and not really a comprehensive position on how I evaluate reports.To the original question in this thread, which was about the way I file reports, I take the advice onboard: be explicit about whether I'm requesting a second opinion or requesting action.I don't think I have much more to add here. But I'm happy to have further discussions about how to file SPI reports, how to evaluate reports, methodology, confirmation bias, etc, if any of you feels like it. MarioGom (talk) 10:49, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry if my post came off as criticism - that wasn't what I intended. I mainly wanted to start a discussion about how others approach evaluating evidence at SPI. I'm a bit surprised, for example, about Bbb23's statement that he doesn't verify the evidence for himself before carrying out an awaitingadmin request. I don't think it's wrong - arguably that's the entire point of having non-admin clerks. But it's not how I do things. I just find the differences in practice interesting. Spicy (talk) 21:38, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Well, this has certainly been a lively and, as Spicy says, interesting conversation. Wikipedians don't share practices that often, and sometimes when we do, it's again, as Spicy says, surprising. I'm not sure we always want to know.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:54, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Has WPOP stalled?
Hi, I noticed you often contribute at WP:WPOP. Is it normal for new reports not to be addressed for five weeks? ☆ Bri (talk) 17:14, 26 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Most admins that were active in the recent past are not so active in the area nowadays. I don't want to pester any of them individually, but I guess a reminder could be posted to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject on open proxies or WP:AN? MarioGom (talk) 21:22, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red May 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Aryan race&#32; on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 05:30, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red - June 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Northeastern University&#32; on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 05:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023
Hello , Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by  and  with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of, and also some patches from , has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders
 * Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
 * There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and on IRC.
 * Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Feedback request: Language and linguistics request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Limburgish&#32; on a "Language and linguistics" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 11:30, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red July 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

New pages patrol needs your help!
Hello , The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:
 * There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
 * Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Sent by using  at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

SPI tagging
Hello, MarioGom,

In Sockpuppet investigations/MartinPict you stated that you were going to tag the confirmed and suspected sockpuppets' pages. But there is nothing regarding User:Waterdoyle that indicates an association with another editor on the project, not on their User page, not in the block notice on their Contributions page and there is no block notice on their User talk page. I realize that if the evidence is accurate, the editor will know they have been socking but I think if any questions arise, it's important to provide as much information as possible. I wouldn't necessarily have expected a tag on the User page but since you say in the SPI that you are taking care of it, I was surprised not to see it. Let me know if I have misunderstood anything. Thank you! Liz Read! Talk! 23:39, 1 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the heads up. SPI clerks generally do not tag unblocked accounts. At the time of my comment at SPI, I tagged the confirmed accounts that were already blocked, and requested further blocks. I guess my comment was confusing, because I said I'm tagging, when I should probably have said I tagged. I was only referring to accounts blocked before my comment. Anyway, now I added the missing tags to ParisDakarPeräjärvi and Waterdoyle. As for block notices in user talk pages, these should be placed by the blocking admin. : Would you mind checking these blocks and add block notices? Thanks! MarioGom (talk) 15:55, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * @Liz what are you looking for? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/MartinPict&diff=prev&oldid=1162562506. We never tell the socks we are blocking them. Courcelles (talk) 16:10, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Sock investigation
Hey

Do sockpuppet investigations not mean anything anymore?

I posted this 15 days ago:

Sockpuppet investigations/Arjun19990012

Will this get looked at before I die?

(141.132.22.19 (talk) 08:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC))


 * Maybe. Your report is not the only one in the backlog. MarioGom (talk) 11:38, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:List of Oceanian countries by area&#32; on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 18:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red 8th Anniversary
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

User:MarioGom/sandbox/MEK characterization proposal
Please let me know when you're ready to start an RFC on this. I plan on using the approved CTOP sanctions to try and keep the RFC on point and from getting too sprawling. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:30, 23 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you! That will be very helpful. I still have to go through some more sources and then figure out what the proposal will be. There is both the question about what the characterization should be, and whether it belongs to the lede at all. MarioGom (talk) 18:02, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I will probably take quite some more time before opening that RFC. There's only so many open disputes I can track simultaneously before my head explodes ;-) But I will notify you when the time comes. Thank you again. MarioGom (talk) 12:35, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
 * No worries. I'm keeping an eye on the discussions on that talk page as well to see if I can get a grasp on what's going on with the talk page and all of the logjams. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:45, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm getting ready to start this RFC. See User:MarioGom/sandbox/MEK characterization proposal. The RFC question is in the Draft RFC section. As support material, plan to include the summary table, as well as the reference list in the "Independent sources" section. Do you have any feedback about it? Before starting the RFC, I plan to start a workshop thread to give everyone a chance to add more options to the RFC, add more sources to the initial list or challenge the selected quotes. MarioGom (talk) 17:01, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Looks good, and the workshop is a good idea, as other editors may want to try out some other language. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:55, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Tetragon Financial Group, Tag Removal
Hello. In January 2022 you placed a tag on the Tetragon Financial Group article for Undisclosed paid editing. As the disclosed paid editor for the company, I have been working with the editing community, including Paul W, to clean up this article and bring it to compliance with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly about netural point of view. I have made requests to remove promotional content, excessive information regarding other Tetragon entities, and the Awards section; these have been accepted and implemented. Details about the company's history and business model have been clarified (see edit request above). With this in mind, and with my COI fully disclosed, can you please remove the undisclosed paid editing tag from the article? Thank you CC for Tetragon (talk) 12:45, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Tagging
Thanks for taking care of all the tagging at Sockpuppet investigations/Belugajdm. I was going to do it, but you beat me to it. :-) --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:17, 21 August 2023 (UTC)


 * No problem. Given the size of the case, it can still use a review deeper than usual before archiving though. Also I see now that this could have been a good training activity, so don't hesitate to note that you intend to do something in a case for others to leave it aside for a while. MarioGom (talk) 19:40, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

New message from Lemonaka
You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:Kursant504. &#x0020;On August, they have explained about paid editing, but cannot persuade me to believe that, you may want to have a look. -Lemonaka‎ 20:41, 21 August 2023 (UTC)


 * I'm not interested in that discussion unless Kursant504 requests any clarification from me. If you think there's an ongoing issue (I'm not sure there is), you can report it. MarioGom (talk) 21:35, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

September 2023 at Women in Red
--Victuallers (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

SPI interpretation
Perhaps there's been a misunderstanding in Sockpuppet_investigations/64.114_etc, so let's make sure we're on the same page.

Here is what I believe happened: An IP 64.114.239.31 did something to get blocked for a year in October 2022. Someone created an account named "64.114 etc", and in that user's page, it says they're that blocked person, which I believe passes as admission that passes WP:DUCK. I'm guessing the IP was blocked from anonymous editing or creating account, but not prevented for registered user from using. Perhaps they went and registered an account on their phone so they can continue to edit from the computer by logging-in before serving the block time. Graywalls (talk) 17:55, 26 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Unless there is any current disruption, I don't think some mistake done before registering an account should be taken as a reason to indef. Let's just give some WP:ROPE. If you think there's ongoing disruption, or that past actions with that IP give the impression that a block is needed now to prevent harm to the project, let me know and I will reopen the case. If you don't agree with this take, I can reopen and ask for another opinion. MarioGom (talk) 18:05, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
 * There is a second account following the same pattern, so I have reopened the case. MarioGom (talk) 07:51, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Related to sockpuppet investigation
Hi MarioGom!

Ref.: Sockpuppet investigations/TechGenWikinator03

I think the user that you've tagged @Bishdatta appears to be inactive from 21 October, 2022 as they have not made any contribution post that date.

Also, could you add me into any training group so that I can learn to make use of various Wikipedia tools if any such training groups exist?

Thank you Thewikizoomer (talk) 16:57, 26 August 2023 (UTC)


 * you can start at Help:Introduction or ask for help at the Teahouse. But I would suggest you to start by avoiding picking fights with others, and use talk pages to politely resolve disputes. MarioGom (talk) 17:08, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Great! I'll check them out and enrol myself in. :)
 * I second with you. I'm completely against picking any fights. Related to the recent event, I was trying to respond to the user terming my username as hostile and I'm only trying to clear confusion related to the article.
 * Thank you @MarioGom Thewikizoomer (talk) 17:13, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
 * It is great that you commit to contributing to Wikipedia, but I think you could benefit from some further guidance. Adopt-a-user is a mentorship program that you could be interested in. Best, MarioGom (talk) 14:56, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll have a look at it. I now understood that I should request for administrator intervention for vandalism cases.
 * Thank you MarioGom Thewikizoomer (talk) 15:28, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Domestic violence&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 23:30, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:History of Transylvania&#32; on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 11:31, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Additional account overlooked at SPI
Hi, Hopefully before archival of this case you just closed — an additional account seems to have been overlooked. Sorry for taking this to your talkpage but I'd already tried pinging the previous attending admin on the case page to no avail.

Cheers, 2406:3003:2077:1E60:A3EF:7617:2021:2DE7 (talk) 06:42, 30 August 2023 (UTC)


 * That account has not edited since 2021. Feel free to report it again if it becomes active. MarioGom (talk) 16:43, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Understood, thanks. 2406:3003:2077:1E60:A3EF:7617:2021:2DE7 (talk) 17:11, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Gracias
Buenas. Tenía pendiente dejar este mensaje desde hace un tiempo, pero quería darte las gracias por los comentarios que realizaste en la discusión sobre la que te había notificado, a pesar de las diferencias editoriales que hemos podido tener. Estoy a la disposición en caso de que necesites ayuda para artículos relacionados en Venezuela, particularmente si es necesario buscar fuentes o referencias. Saludos cordiales y un abrazo, NoonIcarus (talk) 14:09, 3 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Muchas gracias por tu mensaje. Me gusta pensar que en Wikipedia siempre hay sitio para colaborar incluso cuando pueda haber diferencias políticas notables ;-) Saludos y un abrazo. MarioGom (talk) 18:33, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

My apologies
I apologise for Special:Diff/1173862128. I did not realise that I wasn’t allowed to change the status. I’ll try my best to remember to not do it again, if I’m involved in any SPIs in the future.

All the best, A smart kitten (talk) 22:19, 4 September 2023 (UTC)


 * No problem. MarioGom (talk) 22:24, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Proxying?
Hi, MarioGom. With regard to the admittedly-complicated Sockpuppet investigations/Miracle dream, the claim is not that there is proxying, but that an editor blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry (Miracle dream) is editing with a new account (Lijing1989). That's not permitted, is it? Kanguole 22:24, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Manhattan&#32; on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 00:30, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Zahida2013
Hi MarioGom,

Thank you for your close at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zahida2013. I agree with your decision to allow the user a bit more rope, given the limited nature of the violation. However, I took a look at their talk page and saw that they've doubled down on the deception, claiming to not be "aware" of having used multiple accounts. As is made clear by the details of the case –– where the two accounts were used minutes apart to create the illusion of support –– this is not credible. Being generous with second chances is a good thing, but I would suggest that having people think they can get away with deception like this is detrimental to the project. Thanks for giving this your consideration. Generalrelative (talk) 01:02, 15 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the heads up. I will follow up in their talk page. MarioGom (talk) 14:53, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

SPI
In reference to this SPI case, I have some information I want to share but it includes a semi-experienced user. I previously shared through the PAID-Wiki email but no response. Since that time, I have additional information and wondering if there is another private avenue to share the information. CNMall41 (talk) 17:31, 17 September 2023 (UTC)


 * paid-en@ is the best place for off-wiki evidence, and there are usually answers (but there is a huge backlog). If you want to discuss the circumstances of the report, feel free to email me. MarioGom (talk) 17:44, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I figured as much. There has been a lot of it lately so I'm sure they are swamped. I will email you shortly, but I will warn you, it is a rabbit hole and likely leads to the paid agency you linked to in the SPI comments. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:51, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm in for UPE rabbit holes ;-) MarioGom (talk) 18:31, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Email sent. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Follow up email also sent with more info. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:30, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol newsletter
Hello ,

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:
 * You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
 * Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red October 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

A bowl of strawberries for you!

 * Thanks ;-) MarioGom (talk) 07:49, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Lazy-restless
Regarding your conclusion here, how Bringtar could be canvassed off-wiki when Lazy-restless was only socking with IPs at that time when Bringtar got reactivated?

I must note that AfD was not the only thing here. Bringtar's gross WP:BLP violations and problematic content on List of converts to Islam from Hinduism of more than 30,000 bytes, was never restored by anyone. It was restored only by Lazy-restless with this proxy IP sock, 202.134.10.130 and same IP also edited about Ved Prakash Upadhyay. That is the same article which Bringtar was saving by logging in after almost 2 years.

Then both Bringtar and this Lazy-restless have problem with me leaving DS-alert to Bringtar.[

Not to mention that both Lazy-restless and Bringtar have falsely accused me of sockpuppetry by starting SPIs where both are targeting years old accounts with thousands of edits.

This is a clear-cut WP:DUCK case and should result in block. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 03:24, 3 October 2023 (UTC)


 * I don't think these IPs are proxies, they seem to be just regular residential addresses, although that does not make a difference in this case. The connection between the IP and Bringtar seems to be clear, but I don't see so clear evidence that the IP is Lazy-restless. If there's further evidence connecting the IP to Lazy-restless, let me know and I will review it. On this being a clear-cut duck case... when no clerk or admin acts on a case for almost a month, that's usually because it's not clear-cut at all. MarioGom (talk) 17:43, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the response. You said "connection between the IP and Bringtar seems to be clear," I agree. But there should be no doubt that this short-lived sock created after the SPI was also the same IP and Bringtar, since he made the same false accusation of sockpuppetry as the IP, and also urged to include "Rahman" on conversions list just like Bringtar did. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 03:32, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't know what's the link between Deepmason and Lazy-restless. might be able to add some more information here, since he placed a checkuser block on Deepmason. However, there was no mention of it in the SPI of the relation, and no tags in the account. There's some other possible reasons other than being confirmed to a master. If these reasons include a connection between an account and an IP, that connection cannot be disclosed publicly. That being said, even if it cannot be linked to the master, Bringtar could possibly be blocked if connected to Deepmason. I will post a notice to other clerks at WT:SPI/C for someone else to review the case. Best, MarioGom (talk) 19:59, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
 * If I remember correctly, I saw that and  were confirmed to each other, and ✅ from the globally locked account, but I wasn't convinced they were the same as Lazy-restless, so I blocked them. Can't think why I didn't explain that in the SPI case - it's possible I got side-tracked and forgot to come back and add a note.  Girth Summit  (blether)  07:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Gosh, actually now that I look at it again, I think Deepmason/Planethabitat probably is Lazy-restless - they're on a different IP range, but there are some other factors that would probably have put me in territory. Can't think why I didn't pick that up at the time - might be worth reopening that SPI and I'll do a proper job later today/tomorrow.  Girth Summit  (blether)  07:28, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I've gone into the archive and added a couple of notes, and requested locks on the blocked accounts - think it's all tidied up now. Girth Summit  (blether)  10:41, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you! MarioGom (talk) 12:23, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Since it has been confirmed that Deepmason was also Lazy-restless, I think there is no problem in blocking Bringtar now. Right? Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 23:16, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:2023 Manipur violence&#32; on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 07:30, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:State of Palestine&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 09:31, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red - November 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

November Articles for creation backlog drive
 Hello MarioGom:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!

The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Al-Shifa Hospital&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 20:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

SPI
Hello, would you mind reviewing the new behavioral evidence that I provided for the Abrvagl investigation before it is archived? KhndzorUtogh (talk) 00:06, 9 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I have re-opened the case. Me or another clerk will look at it again. MarioGom (talk) 08:47, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Royalty and Nobility&#32; on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 23:30, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Can you help in this too
@MarioGom You just solved one report filed by me quickly. Sorry for jumping the line. But one case filed by me is waiting for nearly 14 days. Can you also please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Snthilakammarist. The suspected master of the account has long list of cross-wiki abuse. If you think it should be seen today then it will be of great help. Cheers.  ShaanSengupta  Talk 15:04, 5 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The case backlog goes back for almost 2 months. Someone will review your report sooner or later. MarioGom (talk) 15:06, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Blueberry72
Hi, just to let you know Blueberry7 has been sending me death threats over email ever since I opened the SPI on them, where can I take it further from that please? -- мѕ.   αmєrчkαh  06:48, 6 December 2023 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry to hear that. Please, write an email to WMF's Trust & Safety team at ca@wikimedia.org. You can also forward the threats email to them. They will investigate and take any necessary action. MarioGom (talk) 09:59, 6 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Okay the situation is going from ridiculous to disgusting. I can laugh at Ms. Amerykah's attempts to accuse me of being a sockpuppet without having a shred of evidence, but sending death threats is a crime. I kindly ask you to take a look at Sockpuppet investigations/MariaJaydHicky, it's been years since a user named MariaJaydHicky was blocked for genre warring and multiple accounts and keeps resurfacing on wikipedia via numerous sockpuppets or IPs from the UK. One of her favorite attempts to respond to accusations, aside from deleting reports, is to accuse other users of being sockpuppets of Giubbotto non ortodosso for which she seems to have an obsession. She does this mostly with me because seven years ago I was mistakenly blocked as Giubbotto's sockpuppet and later unblocked, but she does it with other users as well, as can be verified by user Aoi's post in Sockpuppet investigations/MariaJaydHicky.  I wonder if you'll really follow the instructions MarioGom gave you and what evidence you will present. Blueberry72 (talk) 15:55, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Please, do not rehearse the dispute on my talk page. I suggest you both to just be patient and wait for the SPI reports to be processed. MarioGom (talk) 16:53, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red December 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Israel&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 18:30, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Deletion Request
Hello! I would like to draw your attention on the page "Qatari support for Hamas", as i have noticed a new separate page of 2023 Israel- Hamas war/Hamas with the name of "Qatari support for Hamas". There is no such need of separate page for that particular topic. Furthermore, the content is copied from other pages. So, I request you to acknowledge it and put the page under speedy deletion review. Thank you Contributor00001 (talk) 09:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC)


 * I think you have a point, but I do not plan to intervene there. MarioGom (talk) 17:48, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for bringing the Amini situation to my attention. Chetsford (talk) 21:46, 14 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the quick response! Best, MarioGom (talk) 21:48, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Fusion
Hello how are you? I want to ask you if you can merge on wikipedia in Spanish merge these two articles and that deal with the same topic of the the Re'im music festival massacre between Gaza and Israel but both articles created are on Wikipedia in Spanish --190.219.223.224 (talk) 23:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)


 * There is already a merge request there. Someone will handle it sooner or later. MarioGom (talk) 23:07, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed
Hello, MarioGom. Thank you for your work on Karimou Salimane. Chaotic Enby, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chaotıċ Enby  (t · c) 14:29, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Would you be able to move an SPI to a different case name?
Hi! Sorry if you'd prefer not to be bugged about SPI on your talk page, but I figured I'd ask if you could move the investigation I opened at Sockpuppet investigations/ސްސްޕައެވެ އެރޖަރ to Sockpuppet investigations/あすぺるがあすぺしゃりすと. Couldn't remember the name, but an IP pointed me in the right direction. Thank you! Schrödinger's jellyfish &#9993; 03:24, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Inquiry Regarding Recent Edit to Cyber Skills Center
Hi MarioGom,

I've seen that the Cyber Skills Center page was redirected on 7th December 2023 due to notability concerns (WP:ORGCRIT). Could you share which specific notability criteria were not met? If there were any discussions that led to this decision, links to those would be helpful for context.

Thanks for your help! Jeremywade10 (talk) 21:39, 2 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi : what WP:ORGCRIT requires is that the organization is subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. You have further explanation of how to apply this in the section just below that (WP:SIRS). Sources need to be independent. Interviews are not independent reporting. So for a source about the organization, you should discount any passage that is just direct or indirect quotes from the organization and consider only what's left of independent reporting. Also the coverage needs to be in-depth (WP:ORGDEPTH). Brief routine, coverage of the organization creation are not considered significant coverage. MarioGom (talk) 10:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red March 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:J. Sai Deepak&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 15:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Foreign Secretary&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 20:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:1948 Palestine war&#32; on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 01:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Articles with Baidu Baike links


A tag has been placed on Category:Articles with Baidu Baike links indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 08:49, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

RFA2024 update: no longer accepting new proposals in phase I
Hey there! This is to let you know that phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship (RfA) review is now no longer accepting new proposals. Lots of proposals remain open for discussion, and the current round of review looks to be on a good track towards making significant progress towards improving RfA's structure and environment. I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who has given us their idea for change to make RfA better, and the same to everyone who has given the necessary feedback to improve those ideas. The following proposals remain open for discussion:


 * Proposal 2, initiated by, provides for the addition of a text box at Requests for adminship reminding all editors of our policies and enforcement mechanisms around decorum.
 * Proposals 3 and 3b, initiated by and, respectively, provide for trials of discussion-only periods at RfA. The first would add three extra discussion-only days to the beginning, while the second would convert the first two days to discussion-only.
 * Proposal 5, initiated by, provides for a trial of RfAs without threaded discussion in the voting sections.
 * Proposals 6c and 6d, initiated by, provide for allowing users to be selected as provisional admins for a limited time through various concrete selection criteria and smaller-scale vetting.
 * Proposal 7, initiated by, provides for the "General discussion" section being broken up with section headings.
 * Proposal 9b, initiated by, provides for the requirement that allegations of policy violation be substantiated with appropriate links to where the alleged misconduct occured.
 * Proposals 12c, 21, and 21b, initiated by, , and , respectively, provide for reducing the discretionary zone, which currently extends from 65% to 75%. The first would reduce it 65%–70%, the second would reduce it to 50%–66%, and the third would reduce it to 60%–70%.
 * Proposal 13, initiated by, provides for periodic, privately balloted admin elections.
 * Proposal 14, initiated by, provides for the creation of some minimum suffrage requirements to cast a vote.
 * Proposals 16 and 16c, initiated by and, respectively, provide for community-based admin desysop procedures. 16 would desysop where consensus is established in favor at the administrators' noticeboard; 16c would allow a petition to force reconfirmation.
 * Proposal 16e, initiated by, would extend the recall procedures of 16 to bureaucrats.
 * Proposal 17, initiated by, provides for "on-call" admins and 'crats to monitor RfAs for decorum.
 * Proposal 18, initiated by, provides for lowering the RfB target from 85% to 75%.
 * Proposal 24, initiated by, provides for a more robust alternate version of the optional candidate poll.
 * Proposal 25, initiated by, provides for the requirement that nominees be extended-confirmed in addition to their nominators.
 * Proposal 27, initiated by, provides for the creation of a training course for admin hopefuls, as well as periodic retraining to keep admins from drifting out of sync with community norms.
 * Proposal 28, initiated by, tightens restrictions on multi-part questions.

To read proposals that were closed as unsuccessful, please see Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I/Closed proposals. You are cordially invited once again to participate in the open discussions; when phase I ends, phase II will review the outcomes of trial proposals and refine the implementation details of other proposals. Another notification will be sent out when this phase begins, likely with the first successful close of a major proposal. Happy editing! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her), via:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Arbitration case request
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Arbitration/Requests/Case and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 15:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello ,
 * The Arbitration Committee has decided to procedurally remove the case request Promoting Iranian government POV in Wikipedia? as invalid. Details can be found at the bottom of.
 * Best regards, &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 21:19, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Arbitration case request
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Arbitration/Requests/Case and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, 182Line (talk) 08:31, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

SPI
Hi there, in January you endorsed the SPI/Checkuser at Sockpuppet investigations/Banana Republic. I believe he is back, and it is not just me seeing issues. has had to protect the Template talk:Protection table because of the type of edit warring typical of these socks by the editor I reported at SPI a week ago. I know SPI is backlogged, but any chance you could take a look? Thanks. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 22:03, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I fully protected Template:Protection table due to a slow edit war. The editor concerned is clearly a returned user. Johnuniq (talk) 02:16, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Language and linguistics request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Bitcoin&#32; on a "Language and linguistics" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 09:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

There is a mop reserved in your name
Maliner (talk) 08:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Wait… aren't you already an admin? Or do I miss my userhighlighter too much. Zippybonzo &#124; talk  &#124;  contribs  (they/them) 21:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * . Would support. Do you have any good articles or featured content? Would likely make your run smoother if you did. – Novem Linguae (talk) 01:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I would happily support your RfA. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your kind words! I'm not considering it at the moment. Maybe some time in the future ;-) MarioGom (talk) 15:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Can't wait, comrade. — Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
Hello ,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:
 * You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
 * Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia talk:Political endorsements&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 09:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Djong (ship)&#32; on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 16:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red May 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
<section begin="announcement-content" />
 * You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. 

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,<section end="announcement-content" />

RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

RFA2024 update: phase I concluded, phase II begins
Hi there! Phase I of the Requests for adminship/2024 review has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:

See the project page for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. theleekycauldron (talk), via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Proposals 2 and 9b (phase II discussion): Add a reminder of civility norms at RfA and Require links for claims of specific policy violations
 * Proposal 3b (in trial): Make the first two days discussion-only
 * Proposal 13 (in trial): Admin elections
 * Proposal 14 (implemented): Suffrage requirements
 * Proposals 16 and 16c (phase II discussion): Allow the community to initiate recall RfAs and Community recall process based on dewiki
 * Proposal 17 (phase II discussion): Have named Admins/crats to monitor infractions
 * Proposal 24 (phase II discussion): Provide better mentoring for becoming an admin and the RfA process
 * Proposal 25 (implemented): Require nominees to be extended confirmed

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Port Erin Women's Detention Camp&#32; on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 15:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
TylerBurden (talk) 20:02, 15 May 2024 (UTC)