User talk:MarioWario91

January 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mario Kart has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mario Kart was changed by MarioWario91 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952546 on 2015-01-18T07:14:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:14, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Mario Kart. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Neil N  talk to me 07:27, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Nintendo DS, you may be blocked from editing. ''You deleted correctly cited info and added WP:OR. And your edit comment indicates that you *know* that it's going to get deleted. This is very bad. Please stop editing until you read WP:5.'' — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 13:59, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, to expand on what Smuckola is saying, please slow down and take the time to learn how things work here. The article's here are meant to be written like an encyclopedia, backed by what is said by reliable sources. Your contributions, no offense, closer resemble a casual conversation with friends. Also, Wikipedia generally discourages trivia and random factoids, especially when you don't provide a source. Please keep this in mind. Thanks. Sergecross73   msg me  14:18, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * This edit makes me think you don't understand exactly what I'm saying. You can't just randomly insert "oh by the way these are the three best games". You need a source, and you need to explain the context. (Best selling? Best reviewed? Something else?) If you're just talking about your personal opinion, then that's not allowed, on Wikipedia we write according to what reliable sources say. Let me know if you have further questions. Sergecross73   msg me  16:34, 20 January 2015 (UTC)