User talk:Mario Petillo

Your submission at Articles for creation: Batora: Lost Haven has been accepted
 Batora: Lost Haven, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Batora:_Lost_Haven help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:51, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello Mario Petillo. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mario Petillo. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 13:35, 19 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @331dot, you're right: I reported the conflict of interest on Wikipedia Italy and not here. I had already spoken to @Zxcvbnm about this during the drafting of Batora: Lost Haven. I'm not paid for these changes, but I'm the company's PR Manager, so it's part of my job. Is the same template that you indicated to me valid? Then, as I did for Batora: Lost Haven, I would like to ask you for advice on how to improve the Stormind Games page in order to be able to publish it. Thank you Mario Petillo (talk) 13:44, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, employment counts as paid editing, especially if Wikipedia editing could conceivably fall within one's job duties(such as with a PR manager). My message above provides a form to use, which you may place on your user page. You may also read WP:PAID for additional guidance.
 * Please understand that each language version of Wikipedia is separate, and all have their own rules and policies. What is acceptable on the Italian Wikipedia is not necessarily acceptable here; the English Wikipedia tends to be stricter than others. The draft you wrote mainly discusses the products of the company, and not the company itself and why sources consider it important or influential. I get that the company likely sees itself that way, but Wikipedia is interested in how others see the company. An article about your company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Please read Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 14:12, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok, thank you: I have posted a disclosure to my user page. Speaking about Stormind Games, if I eliminated the entries regarding the published video games and left only infos coming from the interviews of authoritative sources (Pushsquare and Gamesindustry, for example), would it be ok? Mario Petillo (talk) 14:33, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * If you mean interviews with company staff, that would not contribute to notability(though they could be used for other purposes) as an interview by definition would be company staff speaking about the company. Wikipedia wants to know what outside sources say about the company, without any involvement from the company. 331dot (talk) 15:40, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * This; before bothering to start working on an article, you'll want to get your three best non-interview-based sources from the press that speak directly about the company; not just one of its products. Per WP:CORPDEPTH, things like announcements don't apply either; it has to be substantive coverage. If there aren't any, or there are less than that, then the studio likely isn't notable for Wikipedia and won't be accepted no matter what. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:55, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stormind Games (January 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stormind Games and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Stormind_Games Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:331dot&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Stormind_Games reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 13:38, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Remothered: Tormented Fathers into Draft:Stormind Games. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 15:46, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Stormind Games
Hello, Mario Petillo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stormind Games, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Stormind Games


Hello, Mario Petillo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stormind Games".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:27, 27 July 2023 (UTC)