User talk:Mariolchacon

April 2017
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Colombian peace agreement referendum, 2016— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 05:51, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Religious Relations in Kazan


A tag has been placed on Religious Relations in Kazan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cabayi (talk) 10:31, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Religious relations in Kazan


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Religious relations in Kazan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 10:32, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Nonsensical articles
Please stop creating articles without any content in mainspace. Please stop adding links to non-existent articles to otherwise good articles. In short, please do not experiment in mainspace. Your students are likely to have a short and miserable experience of Wikipedia if they follow your current example. Draftspace is a far safer and less confrontational incubator space for new articles. Your students will find it a more rewarding experience to have their drafts promoted to mainspace than to have their efforts deleted.

Your course's title also suggests (on past experience) that some of your students will have WP:OR & WP:NPOV problems. In fact, a poor choice of article would almost inevitably doom them to conflicts on those policies. Please plan ahead. Cabayi (talk) 10:48, 2 April 2018 (UTC)