User talk:Mariordo

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Brusegadi 05:20, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Japan/Costa Rica without army
I don't read Spanish, but believe your source is incorrect. Here's a link to the constitution of Japan, promulgated in 1946 and enacted in 1947, which abolishes any war-time force. http://history.hanover.edu/texts/1947con.html I can't find a source that compares the two directly, and am not that familiar with wikipedia mores to try an edit again. Can I entrust you with this one? I'll check back in in a couple weeks. Cheers. -Matthew —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.144.183.24 (talk) 07:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for droping by and clarifying. Indeed I will check the facts and make the correction if supported. My understanding is that Japan has a peace-time army for defensive purposes only, CR none, but sure I will check on that one, only give me some time since I am right now in the middle of something else.--Mariordo (talk) 11:35, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Wiki has this issue well documented, see Japan Self-Defense Forces, List of countries without armed forces, and particularly read Defence policy of Japan for the interpretation of the Japanese constitution you brought as reference. I hope these articles clarify the issue.--Mariordo (talk) 16:51, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for looking into it. For further clarification, I think there's absolutely an argument to be made that Japan today has an army. More precisely, the Japan Self-Defense Forces page states that in 1950 the government created a National Police Reserve, which could reasonably be called an "armed force." But it also states that after 1945, Japan had zero military capability, and as you know this was constitutionally prescribed in 1946. What I'm pushing for is that even if Japan recreated its army in the 1950s, the statement "Costa Rica was the second country to constitutionally abolish its armed forces" holds true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.144.183.24 (talk) 08:58, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You made a good point, but it is kind of weird because Japan was without army for only for 9 years, CR still does not have one today. A good solution will be simply to state that CR constitutionally abolished its army in 1949, and delete the "first" part. However, I think we should move this discussion to the CR Talk page to give other editors the opportunity to comment and bring more facts. I will do so copying this entire section. Let's continue over there.--Mariordo (talk) 13:19, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

North American blizzard of 2010
Hey Mariordo, just wanted to drop by to say great work taking and uploading pictures for the North American blizzard of 2010, it's greatly appreciated. Kind regards, SpitfireTally-ho! 08:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Your welcome.-Mariordo (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for Your Work on EV Articles

 * Your welcome.--Mariordo (talk) 01:05, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Electric Bicycle
Wow! You've put a tremendous amount of work into this article, and you've done a superb job. The only problem is that I now feel horrifically guilty for neglecting my own good intentions to improve the article. Thanks! Ebikeguy (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Your welcome! I have googled a lot, and it does not seem to be much RS info available. If you know of any reliable sources please let me know, I will have plenty of time during the following weeks to improve it even further. I am particularly interested in developing a summary for India and Australia, that I believe have also significant fleets of e-bikes.-Mariordo (talk) 16:45, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Good work, great read!

 * Thank you very much.-Mariordo (talk) 02:16, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for electric vehicle warning sounds
The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for BMW Mega City Vehicle
The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Renewable Energy Portal
Hi. Some of us are setting up a new Renewable Energy Portal. Feel free to contribute and discuss the matter at Portal talk:Renewable energy. Johnfos (talk) 19:39, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar for you

 * Thank you.-Mariordo (talk) 06:44, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Capital Bikeshare
The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Jaguar C-X75
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 18:03, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK for City Car (Concept)
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 18:03, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Toyota Prius V
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   00:04, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar for you
Thanks.--Mariordo (talk) 22:29, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Veteran Editor Status
I just looked at your edit count, and it would appear you are entitled to display the box above, if you want. If not, erase this whole post. Ebikeguy (talk) 22:36, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I will display it.--Mariordo (talk) 01:54, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Hybrid Scorecard
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:03, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Motor vehicle
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Autolib'
The DYK project (nominate) 08:05, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Milan Area C
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:06, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thanks for the good work at Wheel hub motor!

Ebikeguy (talk) 04:08, 27 July 2012 (UTC) 
 * Thanks, and sorry I couldn't drop by earlier, my Wiki editing has been limited lately (and will continue to be intermittent in the following weeks), as I am in the middle of moving back to Brazil. See you around.--Mariordo (talk) 04:13, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Happy moving! I hope you've found something good to do in Brazil!  Ebikeguy (talk) 04:15, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Superior Scribe Award

 * Thanks.--Mariordo (talk) 13:41, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Frederic Hauge
Alex ShihTalk 12:04, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Bay Area Bike Share
Gatoclass (talk) 16:03, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

A Tesla Roadster for you!

 * Thanks.--Mariordo (talk) 22:04, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Hong Kong
Hi, I did try to discuss Hong Kong in the talk section ages ago but no one replied. If you had looked at the table properly, you'd have noticed that Hong Kong was not removed, but rather moved to the "selected regional markets section" given that it's not a country but rather a region of China. It makes more sense for it to be there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.238.40.176 (talk) 04:56, 16 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the clarification. For the time being I agree with your change, sorry I did not realize you just moved HK below. I will continue the discussion in the talk of the "Electric car use by country" article, so that other editors can participate and bring other ideas.--Mariordo (talk) 14:48, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Cite tool
Hi, which cite tool do you use for filling refs with CiteWeb format ?. I use reFill when an article has 5-10 unfilled refs and if I have the time, but I would like a similar tool that fetches the ref data directly when adding content. TGCP (talk) 17:38, 18 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi TGCP. Since I have been around on Wikipedia for several years, early on I made my own templates for the most used cite types on the default Windows Notepad (no format), so I do a manual cut and paste from this external file, and complete/fill as required. Any tip about existing tools is welcomed. Cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 14:33, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I did that too but I am tired of it. I have installed User:Zhaofeng Li/CiteGen in FireFox. Just click on the – -button in the menu line, and it makes a Cite from the webpage. It's not perfect, and I am still learning, but it seems to improve the process. TGCP (talk) 16:43, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Best would be to simply use the mouse to drag a tab into the edit window at the precise point in the text, and a ref would be made with wikilinks to the article about the source. FX, NY times . Oh wishes. TGCP (talk) 16:46, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the tips.--Mariordo (talk) 16:48, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Here's a similar idea - I'll try to make ref'ing as a Grant idea, and you are most welcome to endorse that or even get involved or suggest involvement for others, as I cannot go further than suggesting the idea. TGCP (talk) 16:54, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Certainly I will support it, let me know.--Mariordo (talk) 17:24, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I added TabToReference, but it needs someone else than me to lead and/or contribute. Please pass the word around. TGCP (talk) 21:43, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Tesla Model 5
Hi, just wanted to discuss the self-driving reference you're making. The Tesla Model 5 is a Level 2 vehicle which is incapable of self-driving. This is supported by Elon Musk, his directors, and all expert sources. Self-driving requires level 4.

Much of the media is either being sensationalist or is ignorant of what self-driving actually means. We should work to be specific on wikipedia. Thanks.


 * All the reliable sources say it was in self-driving mode when the accident happens, you are confusing autonomous driving with just level 4, there are four or five levels by official definition of NHTSA and SAE, check the corresponding section in autonomous car. The Model S is between level 2 and 3, as explained and supported by reliable sources in the Tesla Model S article, see section about Autopilot. Level 3 requires the driver attention. So please stop removing content supported by reliable sources and consistent with the technical definition of autonomous vehicles.--Mariordo (talk) 21:46, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Recent edits to "electric car use by country" regarding Estonia
Hi, really appreciate your hard work sir. I made the edits to the electric car usage article because I believe the vocabulary was flawed, but found you reverted them in your later edit. You said "40 to 60 km or no more than 60 km are not exclusive" in the reasoning for your edit, which I fully agree with. The problem I have with what was\is written is the grammar surrounding the usage of the word minimum in the "at a minimum distance between 40 to 60 km" statements. First, minimum truly means smallest value. One could legitimately say there is a minimum of "40 to 60 km" and mean there are two locations in the whole country separated by 40 or so km. Sometimes minimum does get twisted to mean "at most", and common sense suggests that must have been the intention by the original references and thus our text. But "maximum" or "at most" or "no more than" are much cleaner words to be clearer on meaning. Even more vital, there really can't be multiple minimums, at least without some kind of explanation suggesting they come about in different ways. The minimum (and maximum) temperature today were a specific and single value. If there are different minimums in different places\situations (such as on major highways versus secondary highways), then that should be indicated, or the greater value should be used for simplicity (probably best given it's a big expansive article subject). Just seeking to make positive edits and improve meaning where possible. I gave my best try at researching the intended meaning through additional articles and changing the wording, but I certainly don't know the true setup in Estonia well, so perhaps since you are avid in the electric car circle, you know it better, and can better clarify the language. But as it sits, I'm set that the meaning is hazy in the words used. If you are uncertain or disagree with my viewpoint, perhaps one of us can ask a question at English or ELL Stack Exchange for a wider opinion. Sorry to distract from your busy editing, appreciate the heavy work you do. To God be all glory alone, thanks again, Shane (JeopardyTempest (talk) 12:24, 7 November 2016 (UTC))
 * Coincidentally, the Electric Vehicle Network article uses the phrase "at intervals of no more than 60 kilometres", for what it's worth. I'm about precision.  So if worst comes to worst, perhaps we measure on http://elmo.ee/charging-network/ to get the true value.  Though there's probably better ways we could each use our time! Thanks again, Shane (JeopardyTempest (talk) 12:24, 7 November 2016 (UTC))
 * Go ahead and restore your edit, but please, rmv the source talking about 40 to 60 km, and add any additional sources you consider necessary. Cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 01:23, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Nissan Leaf GA reassessment
Nissan Leaf, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 03:18, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Green Car Congress for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Green Car Congress is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Green Car Congress until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:00, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bay Area Bike Share logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Bay Area Bike Share logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 05:03, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Back in use. Thx for noticing.--Mariordo (talk) 22:32, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bay Area Bike Share logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bay Area Bike Share logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

We need to talk
For some time now, I have been trying to combat bloat in numerous articles related to electric vehicles. Editors like have recently been deleting a lot of the kind of material I have been flagging as being overly promotional and sales or shopping oriented, or simply overly-detailed bloat. It's obvious that most of this deleted content was written by you. But you have not participated in any of the discussions of this, such as when multiple articles were de-listed from Good Article status as a direct result of your additions. You don't seem to be aware that large quantities of text that you have added is being removed en masse.It's time for there to be a discussion about this with you and several editors working on automobile and electric vehicle articles. I would guess that Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles or the WP:ANI noticeboard would be appropriate. Do you agree? --Dennis Bratland (talk) 04:36, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I opened a discussion in the talk, where it belongs, so consensus should be reached either way. And I am aware you are removing content in mass, I just do not think it is worthwhile to spend my time in Wikipedia arguing, but your last removal was too much. Just look how the article electric car use by country was badly chopped, with a lot of non-encyclopedic language and technical errors. Cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 04:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

3RR warning
--Dennis Bratland (talk) 05:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Please engage the discussion in electric car, seek consensus for your interpretation of pricing, there is no need to remove content while the issue is being discussed, be civilized.--Mariordo (talk) 05:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Table in Electric car use by country
Hi, I noticed you removed the table in "Statistics" in Electric car use by country. In my opinion, data written in table format and editable graphs are better than charts in pictures, since numbers can be reused and they can be easily updated. Maybe it would be better to keep the table, update it, add an editable chart, and remove the pictures. What do you think? --Ita140188 (talk) 07:33, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * No problem, I will restore it soon. Just notice that this table has two types of info, the PEV stock and the market share, which btw duplicates some of the content in the table below (I will just update the table with the market shares). Thx for dropping by and cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 14:50, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Editor of the Week
User:Buster7 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
 * Mariordo is a self proclaimed Citizen of the World and an outstanding editor, contributing quality text and superb images. He works in various languages and has brought many articles to FA and GA status. An editor since July 2007, Mariordo has over 58000 edits on many varied Wikipedia projects. He has participated in scores of collaborations throughout Wiki World and is always polite and helpful with all editors. An active member of the Green Vehicle Task Force and WP:Transport, Martiordo has been an invaluable asset to Wikipedia through his excellent work.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

Thanks again for your efforts! &#8213; Buster7  &#9742;   02:23, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much! Totally unexpected but I really appreciate it.—-Mariordo (talk) 03:39, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Electric car
your revert was not needed, there article doesnt define why electric car is battery car. The definition at start isnt enough, if there is no explanation why electric car is battery car, we can use that electric car in other eletric car articles aswell, why battery eletric car has right to use that name only?? of course article needs explanation for that -- >Typ932 T&middot;C 15:19, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Typ 932. By stating that is an electric car with a plug (plug-in electric vehicle) it can only be a BEV. Check the definition of PEV. Cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 21:31, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Chevrolet Volt
Chevrolet Volt, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 21:47, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Plug-in electric vehicle
Plug-in electric vehicle, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 08:36, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Electric car, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tesla Roadster ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Electric_car check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Electric_car?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Plug-in electric vehicles in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GM ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Plug-in_electric_vehicles_in_the_United_States check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Plug-in_electric_vehicles_in_the_United_States?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Peace Dove Christmas
Happy Holidays. &#8213; Buster7  &#9742;   23:29, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Plug-in electric vehicle into Environmental aspects of the electric car. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:46, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Diannaa, thanks for the reminder. I am the sole author of the text that was copied (with the intend of leaving just a summary in the original article which is too long). I indeed tagged the talk page anyway, check here. Cheers--Mariordo (talk) 21:51, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Electric car use by country table
Hello, thank you for your work on electric car use by country. If data is available, it would be interesting to add a column for PEV stock percentage over total car stock of the country. --Ita140188 (talk) 15:57, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I thought of that one too, but total stock for 2018 is not available for all countries, and even for the U.S. different sources report different values. Once finished I will try to do it at least for the larger countries. Cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 16:52, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Electric car use by country
Hi Mariordo. Just letting you know that I have written an explanation at Talk:Electric_car_use_by_country. Could you please let me know if you still have concerns? Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 07:34, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Task force climate change
Hello Mariordo,

You are currently noted as a participant of the WikiProject Environment/Climate change task force. With much of the activity in this task force about ten years ago, I think it's time for a revival. Global warming is getting a lot of attention in the media now and it's therefore important our articles are up-to-date, accurate and neutral.

I've updated the task force page and the to do list and invite you to have a look at the page again, add something to the TO DO list or start collaborating by improving one of our many articles. If climate change has lost your interest, feel free to remove your name from the participants list.

Femke Nijsse (talk) 16:40, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

''' status check? ''' Hi, I've been editing climate since 2011 and your name doesn't look familiar yet you are listed as an active member of the climate change task force. May I move you to the "inactive" status at the task force? You can always move back to "active" whenever you like. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 10:39, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is OK. Cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 21:28, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks, ✅. Any time you want to return, WP:BEBOLD! NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 23:04, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Please support the Sustainability Initiative!
Hi Mariordo, as a member of WikiProject Climate Change, I would like to invite you to support the Wikimedia Sustainability Initiative by adding your name to the list of supporters. Thank you, --Gnom (talk) 18:47, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Missing electric car article
Zenith vans should probably have an entry, but I am not interested enough to do it. Just saying...  Mr.choppers &#124;  ✎  20:25, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * History of Costa Rica ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/History_of_Costa_Rica check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/History_of_Costa_Rica?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Andean culture
 * Indigenous peoples of Costa Rica ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Indigenous_peoples_of_Costa_Rica check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Indigenous_peoples_of_Costa_Rica?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Andean culture

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:21, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Plug-in electric vehicle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roma ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Plug-in_electric_vehicle check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Plug-in_electric_vehicle?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Nissan Leaf
Why did you revert my edit? Whitebro (talk) 21:19, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Because the source is about the U.S. not North America in general, and you did not provide a new source. If you find a reliable source supporting the launch across North America in the same month, please go ahead and do the update (by mistake I published before I could write the edit summary, sorry about that). Cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 22:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Request for edits by transportation engineers
Hello, I'm contacting editors who are categorized as transportation engineers. Please help improve the section about the effects of congestion pricing and its long term effects. Congpric (talk) 11:55, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Plug-in electric vehicle
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;Plug-in electric vehicle&mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Chidgk1 (talk) 06:10, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Chidgk1 thx for letting me know. I already replied in the talk page of the discussion. Cheers.-Mariordo (talk) 16:23, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of modern production plug-in electric vehicles


The article List of modern production plug-in electric vehicles has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Nowadays the list is impossible to keep up to date as there must be thousands of them. Even if you could keep it up to date it would be far too long."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:05, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of modern production plug-in electric vehicles available in the United States


The article List of modern production plug-in electric vehicles available in the United States has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Nowadays the list is impossible to keep up to date as there must be thousands of them. Even if you could keep it up to date it would be far too long."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:09, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Tourism numbers
I see now that I have misunderstood your reference to page 8. I used "UNWTO World Tourism Barometer and Statistical Annex, December 2020", while you have used "International Tourism Highlights, 2020 Edition" for your update at International tourism, and there I see the number 89 for France. There is, however, a note at the number 89, stating that it is the number for 2018. So we do not have a 2019 nuber for France. Regards! --T*U (talk) 16:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)C
 * Oops! I checked, and you are right. We must put a table note to clarify that. Do you want to add the note or do you want me to do it? Or if you prefer just put a N/A, your call. Cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 17:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
 * It has been usual to put N/A (in the form of just a dash) in those cases. There are usually more of them than this year, but the African table have some. If you want to make a note, it is fine by me. --T*U (talk) 17:41, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of modern production plug-in electric vehicles available in the United States for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of modern production plug-in electric vehicles available in the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of modern production plug-in electric vehicles available in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 13:50, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of modern production plug-in electric vehicles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of modern production plug-in electric vehicles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of modern production plug-in electric vehicles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 14:06, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Help with updates to the Rivian page
Hello User:Mariordo. I see you have an interest in electric vehicles and I was wondering if you would assist me with some updates to the Rivian page. I am an employee of Rivian and therefore have a COI. Would you have the time and interest to review my edits and help me with the updates? If so, I’d greatly appreciate it, and we can continue our conversation on the Rivian talk page. I have a request on the talk page now to update the facilities section. Thank you in advance for your time and consideration. Best. IanRivian (talk) 20:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi IanRivian. Thx for your request. Unfortunately right now I am quite busy, but I could take a look in 2 or 3 weeks. Cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 17:41, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Ethanol fuel in Brazil at GAR
Ethanol fuel in Brazil, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 19:48, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Flexible-fuel vehicle
Flexible-fuel vehicle has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 09:26, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Indirect land use change impacts of biofuels
Indirect land use change impacts of biofuels has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 15:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Flexible-fuel vehicles in Brazil
Flexible-fuel vehicles in Brazil has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 16:54, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

History of ethanol fuel in Brazil
History of ethanol fuel in Brazil has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:07, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Congestion pricing
Congestion pricing has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 14:57, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Rejuvenate WikiProject Skepticism
Hello - my name is Susan Gerbic (Sgerbic) and I'm writing to you because at some point you joined WikiProject Skepticism. This might have been months ago - or even years ago. With the best of intentions the project was created years ago, and sadly like many WikiProjects has started to go dormant. A group of us are attempting to revitalize the Skepticism project, already we have begun to clean up the main page and I've just redone the participant page. No one is in charge of this project, it is member directed, which might have been the reason it almost went dormant. We are attempting to bring back conversations on the talk page and have two subprojects as well, in the hopes that it might spark involvement and a way of getting to know each other better. One was created several years ago but is very well organized and a lot of progress was made, WikiProject Skepticism/Skeptical organisations in Europe. The other I created a couple weeks ago, it is very simple and has a silly name WikiProject Skepticism/Skepticism Stub Sub-Project Project (SSSPP). This sub-project runs from March 1 to June 1, 2022. We are attempting to rewrite skepticism stubs and add them to this list. As you can see we have already made progress.

The reason I'm writing to you now is because we would love to have you come back to the project and become involved, either by working on one of the sub-projects, proposing your own (and managing it), or just hanging out on the talk page getting to know the other editors and maybe donate some of your wisdom to some of the conversations. As I said, no one is in charge, so if you have something in mind you would like to see done, please suggest it on the talk page and hopefully others will agree. Please add the project to your watchlist, update your personal user page showing you are a proud member of WikiProject Skepticism. And DIVE in, this is what the work list looks like frightening at first glance, but we have already started chipping away at it.

The WikiProject Skepticism/Participants page has gone though a giant change - you may want to update your information. And of course if this project no longer interests you, please remove your name from the participant list, we would hate to see you go, but completely understand.

Thank you for your time, I hope to edit with you in the future.Sgerbic (talk) 07:17, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Hybrid electric vehicles in the United States for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hybrid electric vehicles in the United States, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Hybrid electric vehicles in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Mitsubishi i-MiEV
Mitsubishi i-MiEV has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 11:47, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of congestion pricing for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article congestion pricing, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Congestion pricing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)