User talk:Marioskit

Welcome!
Hello, Marioskit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Syrianochori does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Zudo (talk) 10:21, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Kontea. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Zudo (talk) 10:24, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Lysi, you may be blocked from editing. Zudo (talk) 10:25, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Vatili. Zudo (talk) 10:27, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Can I ask why are my changes or myself being blocked while I correct some obvious errors that refer to my family's birthplace? I understand your view on neutrality but how about the truth and the internationally stated and accepted? The "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" is an illegal state, only recognized by Turkey and condemned by everyone else, and supported by the Turkish occupying forces that have illegally invaded the island in 1974. Please explain Marioskit (talk) 10:46, 28 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I understand that this is an important topic for you, however Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and as such stating that anything is illegal or legitimate goes beyond the scope of providing a neutral point of view. The Northern Cyprus article appears to cover this in detail with many sources, which I personally believe (anyone else should feel free to weigh in on this) is enough for anyone to gain an understanding of the situation. Zudo (talk) 10:54, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Forgive me but I thought until now that an encyclopedia was a place to go to for facts and truth to further your knowledge and understanding. By your inaction or our disability to correct erroneous claims, all that you are really doing is to unwillingly support those false claims just by the fact that they are published out displayed in plain view for any kid that is doing his history homework. Why is it OK for an illegal state that has taken by force my ancestral land to be able to lay claim on it and display its flag but I cannot state that fact? Marioskit (talk) 11:07, 28 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The problem, as I see it, is that until your edits, no statement was made regarding the legitimacy of any state until you made your edits.
 * A link on each of your edited articles will take any interested reader to the Northern Cyprus article which states that it is not recognised by anyone other than Turkey, in the first paragraph, with cited sources.
 * See also: Foreign relations of Northern Cyprus. I appreciate where you're coming from, but this is an encyclopedia which shouldn't be opinionated. Zudo (talk) 11:24, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

See what I mean. Myself's and my compatriots inaction or oversight is used to defend a false claim. A prime example of this is the country of Skopje (referred to as North Macedonia now). Until 60 years ago there was no such country with such a name, only a region in Northern Greece as it was ancestral land of Alexander the Great. The area where the said sits now, never historically was a country, was referred to as vardaska and it was only under the soviet union that that area was referred to as Macedonia internally. The lands were always part of Serbia, Bulgaria, Albania and Greece. After the fall of the soviet union, they decided to declare their independence with Macedonia as their country's name with no ties to Alexander the Great whatsoever, as stated by their own first president Kyro Gligorof and other prominent skopjians. Their language is slavic/Bulgarian and not Greek as in the ancient kingdom of Macedonia. Through the inaction or oversight of the Greeks, the false publicity e.g Wikipedia that nobody can declare their actions false and illegal and a treasonous agreement(we both know how those come about) that is not accepted by the vast majority of the Greek population, they have now come to demand to be announced as Macedonia in international games ( even though that treasonous agreement states that they are North Macedonia with no historic ties to Alexander the Great :note the said agreement has not been ratified by the Greek parliament which is a prerequisite for the recognition of the name) and their language is "MACEDONIAN". I am sorry but this a rape of history that any educated person that studied two things about Alexander the Great can tell you. Alexander the Great is of Greek descent with both his parents of reqognised Greek descend, the language was Greek and both the ancient capital, birthplace of Alexander and the majority of the lands of the ancient kingdom are still part of modern day Greece, every piece of historic artifact that was related to the kingdom and Alexander himself is in Greek, Alexander himself stated that he was the king of Greeks and yet we have come to this. Because I would hate to see this happening to Cyprus, even now I thought it would be good to correct a few wrongs. People should be able to hear or read the truth, even though sometimes it's not what they want to hear so that the equality of everyone's voice ( especially the ones from small countries with no real international voice) would be preserved and can be heard Marioskit (talk) 12:08, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 12:12, 28 June 2021 (UTC)