User talk:Mariposa16676

Peer Review - Hi! I thought this was a pretty good Wikipedia article already (compared to a lot of the other articles I've seen) but there's always room for improvement! For starters, I think there could be a better introductory sentence in the lead section that signifies more of her impact, especially in the field of women psychology. Also, it would be great to get a picture of such an influential woman. In the Career section, there's definitely a lot of good information already about her most famous work, but it would also be cool to hear about other specific works that she has done. The sections that you currently have are good, but maybe you could add a publications section where you list all the places her work has been published in? Already, in the Career section, it looks like there's a lot of them. Also, I noticed that the intro sentence mentions that she's a neuroscientist and thus I'd like to see more information about her work in that field, and not just psychology. I'm looking forward to the changes you'll be making! Liangdanica (talk) 01:55, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks
Just a quick note to thank you for your work writing the Naomi Weisstein article. It’s well done, useful, and much needed. Thanks. Remes (talk) 04:31, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Mariposa16676, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 02:29, 27 September 2018 (UTC)