User talk:MarisaEngh

Your submission at Articles for creation: Southern California Fishing (December 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Southern California Fishing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Southern California Fishing, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and save.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Southern_California_Fishing Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:David.moreno72&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Southern_California_Fishing reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David. moreno 72   03:58, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your feedback
Thanks! I'm new to Wikipedia and appreciate the help. WhyDoIKnowThat 19:31, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sweet Oaks Ranch


A tag has been placed on Draft:Sweet Oaks Ranch, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  DGG ( talk ) 05:45, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sweet Oaks Ranch (February 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sweet Oaks Ranch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sweet Oaks Ranch, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and save.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sweet_Oaks_Ranch Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sweet_Oaks_Ranch reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:44, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sweet Oaks Ranch


A tag has been placed on Draft:Sweet Oaks Ranch, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  DGG ( talk ) 18:46, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.  DGG ( talk ) 00:06, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~. Please add your messages to the bottom of the talk page, or they may be overlooked. Thank you for declaring a conflict of interest. That does not of course mean you can write anything you like. It's clear from the deleted draft and the fishing article that you don't really know what you are doing, so please read the following carefully. I deleted your article because Examples of unsourced or self-sourced claims presented as fact include: ''
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the ranch, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, Wikipedia, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the ranch claims or interviewing its owners or management. You gave no references at all. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
 * It's not clear how this ranch meets the notability criteria. from what you tell us, it's just another ranch/equestrian centre. If that's the case, it won't qualify for an article here. If its notable as a business, you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, turnover or profits. There is nothing to show that its notable on any other basis.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. This seems intended as a promo piece for the NMA and its CEO. There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. That's particularly the case when they are spamlinks to your employer.
 * Just for completeness, note that you mustn't copy text from anywhere else. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial and text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

I don't know if you saw the comment by ''This draft has no references and so does not establish notability. This draft has too many redlinks.''

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article.

I'm not prepared to restore at present for the following reasons
 * It was already a draft when deleted, so restoring the same text will just get it deleted again
 * I can't see why it's verifiably notable. If it isn't it will just be deleted again
 * You need to get it right next time, if you try again. If it's deleted a third time, I'll protect the article from recreation, and you have no doubt seen the warning above this from admin Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:05, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Southern California Fishing


Hello, MarisaEngh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Southern California Fishing".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 14:18, 15 August 2018 (UTC)