User talk:Marisalobo96/sandbox

Great to see that you've already added a lot of synopsis information! This is good, but it might also be a bit too much. You don't want to summarize the entire show for readers, but to give them a general idea about the characters and plot. :)

I often find that it is useful to use an example of an excellent article of the kind I am working on to give me a sense of what I should be going for. The_wire is a featured article on Wikipedia and so probably exemplifies the ideal Wikipedia article on a TV series. You'll see that they have a synopsis for every season. I would try to pattern your synopsis after that.

As a second point, it's important to cite sources even for the summary of the plot. You might draw this information from reviews or other commentary. If there are important details you can't find in secondary sources that would be OK, but you might want to add tags to signpost that you are aware of this. Groceryheist (talk) 01:27, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Marisalobo96's Peer Review
I like that you have so much content to work with already! I think going forward there should be some editing and consolidation in the events of season 1. While reading season 1 I think there is room to edit it in a way where it gives the reader key points about season 1 instead of a step-by-step summary. Although very detailed, I think there are some few key points you can choose from season 1 and zone in on those aspects. Besides that, there should be some citation within the body of season 1 to make it seem more reliable and content neutral. Overall, nice writing style and great explanation of events. I would also check out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Spoiler to give warnings about spoilers! Looking forward to the final product! Tmm113 (talk) 21:18, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Astoria's Peer Review
Hi, Astoria left her feedback on your user talk page. I copied it here just so you can have all the feedback at one place. It doesn't look like you have made a lot of changes since I last left you some feedback, so I'll hold off on giving you more for now. After you make some more improvements to your draft, please  WP:ping me, and I'll come give you more feedback. Groceryheist (talk) 05:35, 6 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The content is all related to the topic, with neutral tone and balanced statements. Information you are giving is clear and important with citations. No personal statement and biased information. For the Synopsis part, since it is such a long chunk, it will be more easy-to-read and well-organized to divide them into each episode. For the Reference part, remember to add a headline to it. Also, I noticed that you cited several times from the same interview video, it will be good to find some reliable sources that are not produced by the subjects. Moreover, remember to highlight the part you direcly copy from the original Wikipedia article! Overall, you did a really great job! AstoriaZ (talk) 02:38, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Ready to publish?
Sorry if you get this twice, I realized I put the first one on my user talk page. I consolidated my synopsis and added some citations to the summary, you think its good to go live? thanks!Marisalobo96 (talk) 18:46, 11 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi, this looks pretty good! I think you should go ahead and publish it by merging your changes into the article. You can then wipe the draft page on your sandbox and leave a link to the published article. Groceryheist (talk) 20:28, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Synopsis deleted
Hi, the synopsis I posted was deleted today :( A user said it was too detailed, should I just consolidate it further or undo it? thanks!Marisalobo96 (talk) 21:46, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, I noticed this happening too! In a case like this I would try to consolidate it further instead of just undoing it. If they delete it again you might ask them to be more specific about what details they don't like. Groceryheist (talk) 04:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Ok, will do, thanks! Marisalobo96 (talk) 01:49, 20 February 2019 (UTC)