User talk:Marissa.oneill95

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjay Pradhan (January 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:Sanjay Pradhan may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Marissa.oneill95 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Marissa.oneill95 reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 20:32, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sanjay Pradhan


A tag has been placed on Draft:Sanjay Pradhan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.opengovpartnership.org/people/sanjay-pradhan. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 20:33, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Marissa.oneill95, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Draft:Sanjay Pradhan have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:30, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi again! Following a request from on my talk-page, I've undeleted the most recent version of your draft; however, it still contains substantial copyright violations, so I have blanked it and listed it for review at WP:Copyright problems. If you make a successful unblock request (for which please see my comments below), you will be able to work on a rewrite on this special temporary page. You will need to take particular care not to copy any infringing content from the old version into the new (because that would make it useless). If you have questions you can ask them here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:54, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:44, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at Draft:Sanjay Pradhan. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:43, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify: I've blocked this account for two reasons. The first is the repeated violation of copyrights – I've had to delete Draft:Sanjay Pradhan four times because of copyright infringement; the last of those was today, when you re-created essentially the same page as before, with the copied content, after you had been both warned about, and briefly blocked for, copyright violation. Secondly, it appears that you have some connection to the Open Government Partnership, and that your contributions here consist only of undisclosed paid editing in violation of our Terms of Use. If you want to contribute to Wikipedia and to be unblocked, you will need to show that you understand what was wrong with your previous edits, and how you would avoid further problems if unblocked. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:52, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Unblock discussion
I have declined the unblock, but as you know things I do not, please feel free to unblock if you are satisfied.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 20:24, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'm working on this in . I have explained what needs to happen before an unblock; basically what you wrote in your decline of the first appeal above. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:32, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. It's good to know I was on the right page.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 22:02, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

I'm working with this user in OTRS. I am satisified with the unblock appeal above. Do you object to unblocking? ~Anachronist (talk) 21:57, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * No,, I am of course content to leave this decision to you. If I had been making it, I would have wanted to see some clear evidence of understanding of our copyright policy; I would probably have asked the editor to answer these questions:
 * What is copyright?
 * How is Wikipedia licenced?
 * Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
 * Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
 * How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?
 * I'd also have wanted to know how she plans to reconcile her purpose here with our prohibition of WP:PROMOTION of any kind. But your call, whatever you decide. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:29, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I would like to check in on my status of being unblocked. I've been informed by the Wikipedia Volunteer Response Team that given these previous conversations, if I notify you all that there have been significant changes to the text since the original analysis of copyright issues from opengovpartnership.org/support-unit, my unblock request should be carried through without an issue. Significant changes have been made in my external draft document since the initial analysis, and I'm happy to share them on this talk page first if that's preferred. Please let me know how to proceed. Thanks!


 * Congratulations, you are unblocked. Please tag your user page according to my advice in my reply to your appeal above. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:41, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

WP:PAID
Please read and abide by the instructions linked above. Your disclosure should be made on the article talkpage, on your userpage, or in edit summaries, not in the article itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yunshui (talk • contribs)
 * See my unblock message above, it tells you exactly the template you should use on your user page User:Marissa.oneill. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:05, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjay Pradhan (May 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Waggie was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sanjay Pradhan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sanjay Pradhan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sanjay_Pradhan Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Waggie&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sanjay_Pradhan reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waggie (talk) 01:18, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Sanjay Pradhan concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sanjay Pradhan, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:22, 20 October 2019 (UTC)