User talk:Mark.Crosby

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to Social network service has been modified. The article in question does not allow external links due to past proliferation of linking spam. The links you will notice in the article and the "See also" section are specifically links to internal Wikipedia articles. For this reason alone, your reference to Bizmeed has been converted to a Wikilink, although there does not appear to be an article about this organisation as yet. This could be problematic in itself, as another editor might decide to remove Bizmeed altogether as a non-notable link in the article. I have not done this, as I believe your editing is being done in good faith. If you believe Bizmeed to be notable, I advise you to either create a Wikipedia article on the subject, or to garner support for another editor to do so. Please post to the talk page for the article, or contact me here if you have any questions or observations. Thanks, and good editing. Refsworldlee(chew-fat) (eds) 22:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Social network and Bizmeed
Hi, Mark. I have unfortunately felt obliged to remove your reference to Bizmeed from Social network. You must admit that the UK version does not yet have the notability of LinkedIn in the USA, in fact the Bizmeed website admits to only just launching, which counts as a virtual beta project. I have also added a little to the Bizmeed article to save it from the threat of deletion at AfD, which is certainly possible when notability is applied. I will not be nominating it myself. If you have any comments or questions, please do post to the talk page, or indeed on mine. However, please do not revert anything amended today without first doing that. Thanks. Refsworldlee(chew-fat) (eds) 11:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Textboar
The article extboards has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 13:03, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * You're going to need to provide a reliable independent source showing the company's notability per WP:CORP. Being a t-shirt sponsor for one sports club doesn't make a company notable. NawlinWiki 13:09, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Textboards Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Textboards Logo.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 14:08, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bcard
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bcard, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * No sources, orphaned, possible COI edits

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jonobennett (talk) 22:41, 22 February 2009 (UTC)