User talk:Mark.int

Mark.int, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure


 * Thanks HostBot! Invitation accepted. Just had the adventure Mark.int (talk) 23:06, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Legal Notice from InternetQ
Please see: Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents Tim.thelion (talk) 20:34, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi !  We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

--

March 2014

 * Dear Anthony.bradbury, I realize your concerns, but would like to ask that my request be reconsidered. Could you or anyone else involved in the review of my case explain what does the evidence mentioned appears to show? I have read the article on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Don%27t_be_quick_to_assume_that_someone_is_a_sockpuppet and realize that a new user can be often suspected to be a sock-puppet. I realize the concerns raised by the editors who have submitted this case for review, as well as those of administrators that have reviewed it. I visited the page describing the sock-puppetry under investigation on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Zebrasil/Archive . I realize that what has made me a suspect relates to: a) my comment on https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATim.thelion&diff=601079489&oldid=599254839, b) my stating of professional status on my user talk page, and c) the uploading of a document I thought would clarify the status of a legal case under discussion among editors of an article. I admit the fact that the cause of my first active involvement in the Wikipedia project dates back on March 24th, 2014, when other users in the suspects' list of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Zebrasil/Archive are listed. I would like to ask you to show good faith and accept that this is not a single-purpose account. I have no intent of violating the Wikipedia policies from now on. I have no intent to purposely harm anyone in this project, or anyone’s work in this project. It is easy for you to find out, as all my contributions and moves are and will be recorded in your systems. I would also appreciate if someone could help me better understand what the reference “Mark.int is confirmed to Zebrasil” mean in the "Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments" section of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Zebrasil/Archive. I lack the technical tools you have to find evidence for accusations but I am more than willing to cooperate with any Wikipedia Administrator and help clarify the situation. Being part of this community has an increasingly greater importance to me and I would appreciate your consideration. Allow me to repeat that Mark.int is a different user and a different account from the mentioned "master" of the sock-puppetry case "Zebrasil". Allow me also to express my certitude that this complex case has raised concerns among experienced editors and administrators of Wikipedia. Please help me understand where the evidence that links me to this case lays, so that I can avoid similar activity in the future. Please help me understand the steps to be taken in order to disengage from this case, if possible. I would appreciate it if the Wikipedia community could allow me to provide feedback to editors' concerns on talk pages and contribute to its project, provided I abide to Wikipedia's rules and accepted practices. Thank you for reconsidering my case.Mark.int (talk) 18:05, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Read WP:CHECK for more information on what "confirmed" means.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:51, 31 March 2014 (UTC)