User talk:MarkCagney

Hello MarkCagney. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article T. U. K., you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view and verifiability of information.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Joja lozzo  22:15, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Please do not use Wikipedia to promote businesses, such as you did in the article Brothel Creeper and T.U.K.. Wikipedia is not the "Yellow Pages". If you want to list a company for potential customers to find, please consider alternative outlets, such as Wikia's Yellowikis. Thank you. Joja lozzo  22:05, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Promotional content not encyclopedic
I assume you are the same person who earlier opened the user account, User:Tukshoes, since you have duplicated that user's edits almost exactly. Those edits were reverted for a reason and restoring them is inappropriate and could be considered sock puppetry. While I suggested you start another account with a name that wouldn't be considered promotional, I did not do that so you could continue to violate policy. Please stop attempting to use Wikipedia as an advertising channel for your business interests. Joja lozzo  22:12, 14 February 2012 (UTC)