User talk:MarkPSmith

Henry Edward Colvile
Hi, just to let you know Henry Edward Colville is now almost as you left it and moved to Henry Edward Colvile.

I originally reverted (as per my edit summary) as you gave no reason and the Authority controls appeared to disagree, however User:Robertcolvile challenged this on my talk page so I looked into it and fixed it back up almost as you had it (minus the broken image, which is why I noticed in the first place.

I hope you weren't discouraged from editing because I reverted - please just note this was only because Wikipedia works on the principle of Verifiability - Also on the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. You were correctly BOLD, I correctly reverted as it looked wrong and was un-explained and un-sourced, however if you had just explained or found some of the evidence I've now listed on the talk page Talk:Henry Edward Colvile then I would have realised the original was the wrong one.

We always need more good editors so I hope you consider doing more editing and if you have any questions you can always ask for friendly help at Teahouse/Questions

All the best KylieTastic (talk) 21:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)