User talk:MarkYWells/sandbox

Week 8 Peer Review
Hi Mark!

Overall your first section discussing what Paulustrine wetlands are contains a lot of good information, but I suggest that it gets reorganized in a way that would help the reader follow along and understand what you are trying to say. The first sentence and initial definition in this section describes what Palustrine wetlands are, which is good, but the one thing I would consider is shortening the part of the definition talking about ocean derived salts. This part should still be included, maybe just stating "contains ocean-derived salts", and going into depth about the concentrations in the Characteristics of Palustrine Wetlandswhich you already began to do. Paulustrine wetlands are a broad category so listing all of the subcategories within it (marsh, swamp, bog...) is useful. As for the rest of this section, its contents are valid and important to include, but reorganizing it a little bit will only help clarify the point you are trying to make. It goes back and forth between the topics of vegetation and location of these wetlands and i think grouping them together/combining the similar sentences together will help with the flow of information.

Good additional information was added to the Characteristics of Palustrine Wetlands section, describing what makes a Palustrine wetland. You may want to go into depth about each of the charectoristics you mentioned, maybe explaining them more. Also check for spelling errors and fluidity of your sentences (3rd sentence in this section).

Make sure to keep adding sources to help you expand on this topic some more.

Overall it's looking good though! Gasawyer17 (talk) 18:47, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Gabby Sawyer

Hi Gabby! Thanks so much for the review, you gave me a lot of information that I can definitely build on. I definitely plan on adding more to the characteristics. I will also try to find a couple more sources to widen the information I have. Thanks!

MarkYWells (talk) 13:45, 24 October 2019 (UTC)