User talk:Mark A Gillman

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Riotrocket8676  You gotta problem with that? 16:53, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion of Psychotropic Analgesic Nitrous Oxide
A tag has been placed on Psychotropic Analgesic Nitrous Oxide, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Riotrocket8676  You gotta problem with that? 16:53, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Psychotropic Analgesic Nitrous Oxide
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Psychotropic Analgesic Nitrous Oxide, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Psychotropic Analgesic Nitrous Oxide appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Psychotropic Analgesic Nitrous Oxide has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Psychotropic Analgesic Nitrous Oxide and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Psychotropic Analgesic Nitrous Oxide with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Psychotropic Analgesic Nitrous Oxide.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Please note that even if the copyright issue were sorted out, the promotional tone of the text would be unsuitable for an encyclopedia article, which requires a neutral point of view. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 16:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Mark A Gillman (talk) 17:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC)I am the CEO of SABRI and copyright owner of this material and give permission. I have also put in a conflict of interest statement.

March 2009
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. from http://www.chemie.de/lexikon/e/Gasotransmitters/ . Valley2 city ‽ 17:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC) Mark A Gillman (talk) 17:33, 1 March 2009 (UTC)THis is a copy of a page I previosuly put on wikipedia. I originally wrote this text

Conflict of Interest?
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. JohnCD (talk) 17:03, 1 March 2009 (UTC)Mark A Gillman (talk) 17:42, 1 March 2009 (UTC)I have included a conflict of interest statement.

Your article
To resolve the copyright issue it is not sufficient just to assert that you are the author: to publish in Wikipedia, material must be released under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License which means that you agree that anyone can copy and use it for any purpose. If you want to release the material under the GFDL, you should follow the instructions on the copyright warning above. Note also that you will not own any article you write: others can and will edit it.

However I would also urge you to read Wikipedia's policy on WP:Neutral Point of View and guidelines on Conflict of Interest and Advertising. Promotion of a non-profit organization is still promotion. The general tone of the article: "exceptional agent... Advantages of PAN... unique properties... economic advantages... ideal for treating patients... a unique tool... " reads like promotion - this is what led another editor to tag it for speedy deletion as an advertisement, before I observed the copyright problem.

The FAQ/Organizations contains good advice for people wanting make entries concerning their organizations or products. I suggest that you post on the talk page of Wikiproject Medicine to see whether editors with specialist knowledge are willing to help you make a neutral and acceptable article.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:41, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Two more points:
 * this feels very close to original research. Has this work been published elsewhere? Has it been peer-reviewed by the scientific community and received mention in outlets intended for the general reader. Until it has passed these tests, it cannot be published here.
 * The title was ugly and misleading: a) how does "psychotropic analgesic nitrous oxide" differ from "nitrous oxide" and b) it was not a general article on that subject. In the unlikely event that the article is accepted a better title would be "nitrous oxide in the investigation of the endorphin system".
 * For the moment, I suggest you try adding brief mentions of your research in the nitrous oxide and endorphin articles. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:03, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * One small point: what is the curious character in the middle of 'oxy¬gen' for example? If you are try¬ing to pub¬lish on Wiki¬pedia, the least you can do is to edit your text to Wiki¬pedia standards. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:07, 1 March 2009 (UTC)