User talk:Mark Oberlin

Biomatrica
As reviewing administrator, I must apologize for the quite unhelpful response you received by the AfC reviewer. The article is not an essay. However, it does need some improvements, for it is a great deal too much like a press release. I work a great deal with this type of article. In my opinion, you did what I consider a very good job of it, compared to most such material that gets submitted. It's close, but not quite in our style. You might want to consider dividing up the history of the company from the discussion of its products. It's a little hard to follow the way it is, and doesn't put theproper emphasis on the important parts for an encyclopedia, which is what the company produces.

There really is too extensive a background. The article should be about what the company actually does, not about why the problems solved by its products are important. (Nor the train of though by which the founders came to develop them) and the article should be based primarily upon true secondary sources, not interviews with the founder.

Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the company and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Do not include material that would be of interest only to  prospective clients --that sort of content is considered promotional. When writing with a  conflict of interest or as a paid press agent,   you are automatically thinking in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know. And keep in mind that the goal of an encyclopedia is to say things in a concise very plain manner, which is not the style of  press releases or  web sites, which are usually more expansive.

Just go and fix it. And then let me know on my talk page, and I'll take another look. I don't want to approve it quite yet.  DGG ( talk ) 22:04, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Mark,

Just made some comments about the Biomatrica  article over at User Talk:DGG. Jjjjjjjjjj (talk) 05:37, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Biomatrica, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 18:06, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Hi Callanecc: Thank you very much for approving my article! I worked on it for a month. It is very gratifying to have it accepted at last. Thank you again. -Mark Mark Oberlin (talk) 20:12, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Biomatrica company logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Biomatrica company logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Biomatrica Logo.svg)
Thanks for uploading File:Biomatrica Logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:38, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mark Oberlin/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Mark Oberlin/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. j⚛e deckertalk 18:59, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Biomatrica Logo.svg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Biomatrica Logo.svg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 17:18, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo for Biomatrica.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Logo for Biomatrica.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Logo for Biomatrica.jpg


The file File:Logo for Biomatrica.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 11:09, 25 December 2018 (UTC)