User talk:Mark W. Rocha

Welcome!


Hello, Mark W. Rocha, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! We're so glad you're here!  J i m Cartar  ( talk ) 02:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)

Your AfC draft
Hello there, thank you for creating this draft. I have seen the draft there were some minor problems with the article which I have fixed (You can see the changes here ) but the major problem is Notability. That means if the subject is a notable person or not. If notable then please add some verifiable references. Please see WP:GNG and WP:GP before procceding If the draft is not notable and if you cannot introduce references then there is a chance that your draft may not pass AfC review. If you need assistance please feel free to contact me on my talk page or ask a question at our teahouse. I know you can improve. Regards.  J i m Cartar  ( talk ) 02:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Your AfC draft (2)
Hello Mark. User:Jim Cartar has unfortunately slightly misadvised you about your AfC draft. Let's see if I can help. The issue is not so much about your notability, and I'm not going to take a view one way or another about that today. The issue is about writing an article about yourself. This can backfire, as Wikipedians take a strong view about self-promotion, and your draft does unfortunately look very much like that. It is written in the language of a resumé rather than that of an encyclopedia article. I would recommend you to remove the AFC submission template from the draft for now and to take time to consider your next step. It would then be a good idea to read Autobiography and Conflict of interest (and surf from those, if you like) before deciding what to do. Those pages will give you a good idea of the issues that can arise.

I will keep both your talk page and your draft article on my watch list for now, so you are welcome to reply here and I will discuss with you if you wish. (Please note I'm in the UK, so my times are different from yours.) Kind regards, --Stfg (talk) 00:16, 22 February 2014 (UTC)


 * (copying your reply here from my talk page, to keep it threaded)
 * Hi, I am actually not Mark W. Rocha. I made a mistake when making the account. I used his name because he is the sole reason why I wanted to make a wikipedia page. I have already requested to have my username changed for this reason.Mark W. Rocha (talk) 00:54, 22 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting me know that. I expect you've realised by now that using Rocha's name as your username makes it look as if he was writing about himself in those glowing terms. So it's important to get your name change done before you re-add the AFC submission template, when the article may find its way into mainspace. If you aren't getting a quick response to your name change request, you could try making a request at Changing username/Simple. There's a link to click at #5 there to facilitate doing this.


 * Good work on the article the other day. There's still some more you need to do. Paragraphs 3 and 4 of the main section still read like a promotional brochure for PCC, and would benefit from being made more neutral (in tone -- the facts themselves are fine). Also, the Personal life section needs sourcing.


 * One piece of advice about talk pages, if I may: when you reply on people's or articles' talk pages about a subject that hasn't been discussed there before, it's best to start a new section rather than just dropping the comment at the bottom of the page. Doing the latter makes the comment appear as part of the previous section, and may confuse people or even cause a hiccup in an ongoing discussion. You'll find a New section link at the top of any talk page, which gives you boxes for the title and text of the new section.


 * I probably won't pop up here again unless you have questions, but will keep this on my watch list for a while in case anything crops up. Feel free to ping me any time you like. Regards, --Stfg (talk) 11:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. --Nat Gertler (talk) 07:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because its username is a blatant violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, nor is trolling or other disruptive behavior ever tolerated. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text on your user talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Daniel Case (talk) 17:58, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * To the admin considering this: please be aware of this SPI and this COIN section. The edits done by on the article Mark W. Rocha were simple cleanup of promotional COI editing. --Stfg (talk) 17:32, 3 March 2014 (UTC)