User talk:Mark megna1

Welcome!
Hello, Mark megna1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Absolute adjusted slugging percentage ratio, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! TheLongTone (talk) 17:58, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Absolute adjusted slugging percentage ratio


A tag has been placed on Absolute adjusted slugging percentage ratio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 17:58, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Absolute adjusted slugging percentage ratio
Hello Mark megna1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Absolute adjusted slugging percentage ratio for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Danielj2705 (talk) 19:17, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Metaphysics of Being
Hello Mark megna1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Metaphysics of Being for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Absolute adjusted slugging percentage ratio


The article Absolute adjusted slugging percentage ratio has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable term used in non-notable self-published book. Author of article would appear to be author of book, and also has no notability shown..

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peridon (talk) 22:08, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Metaphysics of Being


The article Metaphysics of Being has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable self-published book by author whose notability is not shown. Author of book appears to have created article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peridon (talk) 22:11, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Notability
Please read WP:NBOOK about notability for books, and WP:RS about reliable AND independent sources which are needed to prove the notability. Please note that self-published books rarely pass these criteria as they lack wide-spread notice in reliable critical sources. I would point out that not all regularly published books pass either. Peridon (talk) 22:19, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Journey to Qualia


The article The Journey to Qualia has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced article about non-notable book

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 22:21, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Leatherheads (The Book)


The article Leatherheads (The Book) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable self-published book by author whose notability is not shown. Author of book appears to have created article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:15, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Greatest (The Book)


The article The Greatest (The Book) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable self-published book by author whose notability is not shown. Author of book appears to have created article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:15, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of All Net


The article All Net has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable self-published book by author whose notability is not shown. Author of book appears to have created article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:16, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Mark megna1. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article The Journey to Qualia, you may have a conflict of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Nat Gertler (talk) 02:20, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Being in Time (The Book), you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. No more pages promoting your own books, please. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:01, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Top 100 Baseball Players
Hello Mark megna1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Top 100 Baseball Players for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:22, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. Peridon (talk) 21:10, 12 June 2014 (UTC)