User talk:Mark viking/Archive 2

Comment please
Hi Mark. Can you please have a look at the work & stress talk page discussion Talk:Work & Stress regarding multiple reverts of established content and reliable sources attached, on the 17th January, by iss246. You helped establish consensus over several weeks in this contentious article between a number of editors. Your guidance based on Wikipedia policy at the time was very helpful. Thanks.Mrm7171 (talk) 04:32, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Comment please
Hi Mark. Can you please have a look at the work & stress talk page discussion Talk:Work & Stress regarding multiple reverts of established content and reliable sources attached, on the 17th January, by iss246. You helped establish consensus over several weeks in this contentious article between a number of editors. Your guidance based on Wikipedia policy at the time was very helpful. Thanks.Mrm7171 (talk) 04:32, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cannabis (drug)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Cannabis (drug). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Please Consider this Article for Inclusion in Wikipedia
Hi Mark -- I was hoping you'd be so kind as to help me get this article in my sandbox into Wikipedia. It's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sjzaslaw/sandbox. The title of the article is "AGORA High-Resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project." Please note the Talk page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sjzaslaw/sandbox) where I have reproduced permissions to reuse a press release from UC Santa Cruz and an article of the University of California High-Performance AstroComputing Center. I do not know how to officially register these "licenses" so as to avoid getting into trouble over copyright infringement. Previously, I published the article Bolshoi Cosmological Simulation.

Thanks for any help you can give me! Sjzaslaw (talk) 18:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)Sjzaslaw (talk) 18:43, 11 February 2014 (UTC)Sjzaslaw (talk) 18:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)Sjzaslaw (talk) 18:45, 11 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi Sjzaslaw, I don't know the answer about registering permissions for copied press releases either. Typically what editors do is to read sources and summarize the information in those sources in their own words. That way permissions are not needed for exact copies, provided the sources are referenced properly. Rewriting in your own words may be the simplest approach. If you want to stick with the verbatim text, I suggest you ask about how to do that at Media copyright questions. Good luck! --Mark viking (talk) 01:48, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Electricity
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Electricity. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Constraint satisfaction problem: why lists X1,...,Xn etc.?
Hello Mark viking, I'm confused about some details of your recent edit of Constraint satisfaction problem: Jochen Burghardt (talk) 16:19, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Why didn't you use curly braces to denote sets, e.g. X = { X1,...,Xn } ?
 * If D is not the set formed of members D1, ..., Dn, what is it instead ? An n-tuple ?
 * If every variable Xi may have its own set Di, shouldn't the range of v be changed apropriately, e.g. to D1∪...∪Dn ?
 * And shouldn't Rj be adapted as well ?


 * Hi Jochen, thanks for the critique.


 * I've seen both parentheses and curly braces used in CS, but agree that curly braces are more common. I'll change that for the sets.
 * I guess there are two ways to go about this. We could either say a set of variables $${X_i}$$ and their respective domains $${D_i}$$. Or we could treat $$X$$ as a Cartesian product of the variables $$X = \prod_{i=1}^n X_i$$ so that it can be represented as $$X=(X_1, \ldots,X_n)$$, an ordered tuple and do the same for the domain. Treating these as sets may be simpler for the users.
 * I think $$v:X \rightarrow D$$ for the most general evaluation is still correct. But if we go with the Cartesian product the representation $$v:(\prod_i X_i) \rightarrow (\prod_i D_i)$$ may be more descriptive. Actually, the defn of evaluation is not quite right here, as an evaluation could be a function of any subset of the variables to values in their respective domains.
 * I agree, it should be "$$\langle (x_1,\ldots,x_k),R_j \rangle$$ if $$(v(x_1),\ldots,v(x_k)) \in R_j$$".
 * If we go with Cartesian products and ordered tuples, should the ordered tuples be written as $$X=(X_1, \ldots,X_n)$$ or $$X=\langle X_1, \ldots,X_n \rangle$$? Parentheses are more common in math and physics, but I am less sure about CS. Dechter's book Constraint Processing uses parentheses for the tuples of an instantiation (Section 2.1.2) --Mark viking (talk) 20:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi Mark, thanks for your explanation. For tuples, I'd prefer $$X=\langle X_1, \ldots,X_n \rangle$$ over $$X=(X_1, \ldots,X_n)$$, but I consider this a matter of taste, while I feel curly braces being the only choice for set construction; I can't remember to have seen sets constructed with parentheses instead, except for sloppy notation. I think a tuple of sets $$X=(X_1, \ldots,X_n)$$ is quite different from a cartesian product $$X=X_1\times \ldots\times X_n=\prod_{i=1}^n X_i$$, while you seem to consider both to be the same. As to my knowledge: a tuple can be built from any mathematical objects, while a cartesian product can be built only from sets; a tuple is not a set, while a cartesian product is; the elements of a cartesian product are tuples. E.g. (-1,2) is a tuple, while ℤ×ℕ is a cartesian product, and (-1,2) ∈ ℤ×ℕ. In contrast, (ℤ,ℕ) is not a set, and neither "(-1,2)∈(ℤ,ℕ)" nor "(-1,2)∉(ℤ,ℕ)" makes sense - similar to e.g. "ℕ∈2" and "ℕ∉2". If I'm right, a definition $$v:X \rightarrow D$$ doesn't make sense if $$X=(X_1, \ldots,X_n)$$ is not a set, while a definition $$v:(\prod_i X_i) \rightarrow D$$ means that v gets an n-tuple of variables as argument, so e.g. $$v(x_1)$$ doesn't make sense. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi Jochen, thanks for your advice. I agree that tuples are not equivalent to Cartesian products, but elements of a Cartesian product can be represented as a tuple. I've modified Constraint satisfaction problem to use curly braces for sets to get rid of the tuples in favor of just talking about sets. Sets seem simpler and hopefully there is not much scope for confusion. While I thought it was important to note that the different variables could each have their own distinct domains, I don't want to make the definition more complex than it needs to be. See if it looks reasonable to you; if not please edit to taste. Thanks, --Mark viking (talk) 06:11, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Requirements of IFRS
174.3.125.23 (talk) 22:56, 16 February 2014 (UTC) 174.3.125.23 (talk) 14:55, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

rfc/u
Neutral notification to all participants in Articles for deletion/BeerXML of this: Requests for comment/PrivateWiddle.&mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 15:52, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:BeerXML
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:BeerXML. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

== Please comment on Talk:List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming ==

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — 10.4.1.125 (talk) 00:04, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Mirror symmetry
Hello Mark viking,

I wanted to let you know that the article on mirror symmetry is currently a featured article candidate. Back in October, you gave a very helpful review of the article on the AdS/CFT correspondence, so I thought you might be interested in reviewing this one as well.

Thanks for your time,

Polytope24 (talk) 22:32, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pathology
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pathology. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks, Katie! And thanks for tracking down the copyvio. Regards, --Mark viking (talk) 20:13, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Another barnstar for you!
Sorry for jumping on the bandwagon, but your edits on homology are outstanding.


 * Thank you, Brirush! I've admired your edits on Topology and other articles and am glad my edits pass muster. Regards, --Mark viking (talk) 20:17, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Genetic history of the Iberian Peninsula
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Genetic history of the Iberian Peninsula. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 18:53, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Reciprocal Quantum Logic
Hi,

Regarding Articles for deletion/Reciprocal Quantum Logic, it was actually an article when I nominated it. The author then wrote a new article, merged in the content and redirected there. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 11:39, 22 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi Qwertyus, sorry about the comment, I had not realized that the situation had changed so much after nomination. Next time I'll check the edit history. Thanks, --Mark viking (talk) 16:49, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of common coordinate transformations
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of common coordinate transformations. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Indexing info
Thanks for adding indexing info to the "Elektronika (journal)" article:. Steve Quinn (talk) 05:13, 30 March 2014 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. Thanks for checking and removing the tags. --Mark viking (talk) 07:39, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Redirects
Thanks, Mark, for BCRS. I think it'll be useful. I noted in talk that you had set up the BCRS redirect also. I've been curious how that's done. Could you give me a pointer? Thanks, Evensteven (talk) 15:59, 4 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi, redirects are pretty simple. They are, at their most basic, one-line articles of the form
 * #REDIRECT target article
 * See Redirect for the full story. --Mark viking (talk) 17:28, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on User:Upedge/Windows XP Survey
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on User:Upedge/Windows XP Survey. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Seahorse
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Seahorse. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Trace and tensors
I am interested in what happens when one takes an irreducible representation of $GL(n, C)$, which can be taken as a subspace of $T^{k}(V)$, some $n$-dimensional $V$, already possessing various symmetry properties, and then restricts the representation to a subgroup, say $O(p, q), p + q = n$. The restricted representation will not, in general, be irreducible. It is here extracting traces come in, and I want to find an intuitive understanding of how to go about to find the irreducible subspaces reasonably efficiently. What about $Sp(m), 2m = n$ (meaning a skew-symmetric form)? Similar procedure? Any hint to a nice article would be appreciated if you know of one. I am at the moment working through this article, which might explain my curiosity. It basically takes off from Weinberg's Chapter 2 in QToF Vol I, which is a pretty good starting point. YohanN7 (talk) 20:06, 12 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the background to your question. An expert on the many different relationships among the classical groups and their representations I am not. But the paper you mentioned looks good and in the paper, trace seems synonymous with index contraction. If you are interested more generally in the role of traces in group representation theory, you might want to check out Character theory, where traces of matrix reps are group characters. --Mark viking (talk) 22:46, 12 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes, definitely characters will be important. They will tell if the subdivision into subspaces is correct, at least in principle. Fortunately, this is covered well in books I have. Thanks for the reminding me, it will certainly help in understanding why the procedure presented in the paper is correct. YohanN7 (talk) 11:44, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Question about your comment on "Fractal Tree Index"
Hi Mark,

I've been working on an article on the "Fractal Tree Index" and having no luck moving it forward. You left a comment that searching for ["fractal tree index"] on GScholar gave only two hits, thus suggesting a lack of interest in this topic. I would suggest that for an open source software project, the number of scholarly citations is probably not the best measure of interest, but even so, it's pretty easy to generate more hits on GScholar. For example, ["fractal tree indexes"] gives 6 hits, 5 of which are new. The query ["fractal tree" mysql] gives 7 hits (not all of them on topic, admittedly), but a couple of which were not found in the previous searches. (As an aside, "fractal tree" in this context is a trademark, which is why I use it as an adjective and add "index", but not everyone will be as attentive to this detail. Hence the use of "fractal tree".)   Also, ["fractal tree" tokudb] gives a couple more hits, as does ["fractal tree" tokufs]. In short, it's pretty easy to find over a dozen papers on GScholar that talk about this non-academic software project.

If we look at hits on google itself, I get:

["fractal tree index" -site:tokutek.com] 27,300 results

["fractal tree indexes" -site:tokutek.com] 23,000 results

(adding the -site:tokutek.com so as to filter out mentions on the tokutek website itself).

Trying the "fractal tree" query with various added words to try to narrow the focus of the searches gives:

["fractal tree" -site:tokutek.com tokutek] 5,360 results

["fractal tree" -site:tokutek.com tokufs] 132 results

["fractal tree" -site:tokutek.com tokumx] 6,370 results

and finally, the oldest use of fractal trees:

["fractal tree" -site:tokutek.com tokudb] 47,900 results

I'm happy to modify the article, but frankly I don't know how. Could you give me some guidance?

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farach (talk • contribs) 12:43, 23 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi Farach, I see that Ktr101 has moved your draft into mainspace and that you posted on his talk page at User talk:Ktr101. I took the liberty of replying there to keep the conversation in one place. --Mark viking (talk) 18:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Earthquake prediction
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Earthquake prediction. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Christopher Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Christopher Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Voting system
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Voting system. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gout
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gout. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Guy Fawkes Night
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Guy Fawkes Night. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Richard C. Hoagland
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Richard C. Hoagland. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:5:2 diet
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:5:2 diet. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

The Pulse (WP:MED newsletter) June 2014
The first edition of The Pulse has been released. The Pulse will be a regular newsletter documenting the goings-on at WPMED, including ongoing collaborations, discussions, articles, and each edition will have a special focus. That newsletter is here.

The newsletter has been sent to the talk pages of WP:MED members bearing the User WPMed template. To opt-out, please leave a message here or simply remove your name from the mailing list. Because this is the first issue, we are still finding out feet. Things like the layout and content may change in subsequent editions. Please let us know what you think, and if you have any ideas for the future, by leaving a message here.

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Medicine.

BMJ offering 25 free accounts to Wikipedia medical editors
Neat news: BMJ is offering 25 free, full-access accounts to their prestigious medical journal through The Wikipedia Library and Wiki Project Med Foundation (like we did with Cochrane). Please sign up this week: BMJ --Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:File Allocation Table
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:File Allocation Table. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Median strip
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Median strip. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Iatrogenesis
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Iatrogenesis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Deepak Chopra
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Deepak Chopra. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Violet (color)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Violet (color). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kozyrev mirror
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kozyrev mirror. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Medical Translation Newsletter
 Wikiproject Medicine; Translation Taskforce

Medical Translation Newsletter

Issue 1, June/July 2014 by CFCF, Doc James

sign up for monthly delivery



This is the first of a series of newsletters for Wikiproject Medicine's Translation Task Force. Our goal is to make all the medical knowledge on Wikipedia available to the world, in the language of your choice. note: you will not receive future editions of this newsletter unless you *sign up*; you received this version because you identify as a member of WikiProject Medicine

Spotlight - Simplified article translation

Wikiproject Medicine started translating simplified articles in February 2014. We now have 45 simplified articles ready for translation, of which the first on African trypanosomiasis or sleeping sickness has been translated into 46 out of ~100 languages. This list does not include the 33 additional articles that are available in both full and simple versions.

Our goal is to eventually translate 1,000 simplified articles. This includes:
 * WHO's list of Essential Medicines
 * Neglected tropical diseases
 * Key diseases for medical subspecialties like: oncology, emergency medicine (list), anatomy, internal medicine, surgery, etc.

We are looking for subject area leads to both create articles and recruit further editors. We need people with basic medical knowledge who are willing to help out. This includes to write, translate and especially integrate medical articles.

What's happening?

I've () taken on the role of community organizer for this project, and will be working with this until December. The goals and timeline can be found here, and are focused on getting the project on a firm footing and to enable me to work near full-time over the summer, and part-time during the rest of the year. This means I will be available for questions and ideas, and you can best reach me by mail or on my talk page.
 * IEG grant

For those going to London in a month's time (or those already nearby) there will be at least one event for all medical editors, on Thursday August 7th. See the event page, which also summarizes medicine-related presentations in the main conference. Please pass the word on to your local medical editors.
 * Wikimania 2014

There has previously been some resistance against translation into certain languages with strong Wikipedia presence, such as Dutch, Polish, and Swedish. What was found is that thre is hardly any negative opinion about the the project itself; and any such critique has focused on the ways that articles have being integrated. For an article to be usefully translated into a target-Wiki it needs to be properly Wiki-linked, carry proper citations and use the formatting of the chosen target language as well as being properly proof-read. Certain large Wikis such as the Polish and Dutch Wikis have strong traditions of medical content, with their own editorial system, own templates and different ideas about what constitutes a good medical article. For example, there are not MEDRS (Polish,German,Romanian,Persian) guidelines present on other Wikis, and some Wikis have a stronger background of country-specific content.
 * Integration progress


 * Swedish Translation into Swedish has been difficult in part because of the amount of free, high quality sources out there already: patient info, for professionals. The same can be said for English, but has really given us all the more reason to try and create an unbiased and free encyclopedia of medical content. We want Wikipedia to act as an alternative to commercial sources, and preferably a really good one at that. Through extensive collaborative work and by respecting links and Sweden specific content the last unintegrated Swedish translation went live in May.
 * Dutch Dutch translation carries with it special difficulties, in part due to the premises in which the Dutch Wikipedia is built upon. There is great respect for what previous editors have created, and deleting or replacing old content can be frowned upon. In spite of this there are success stories: Anafylaxie.
 * Polish Translation and integration into Polish also comes with its own unique set of challenges. The Polish Wikipedia has long been independent and works very hard to create high quality contentfor Polish audience. Previous translation trouble has lead to use of unique templates with unique formatting, not least among citations. Add to this that the Polish Wikipedia does not allow template redirects and a large body of work is required for each article. (This is somewhat alleviated by a commissioned Template bot - to be released). - List of articles for integration
 * Arabic The Arabic Wikipedia community has been informed of the efforts to integrate content through both the general talk-page as well as through one of the major Arabic Wikipedia facebook-groups: مجتمع ويكيبيديا العربي, something that has been heralded with great enthusiasm.

Integration is the next step after any translation. Despite this it is by no means trivial, and it comes with its own hardships and challenges. Previously each new integrator has needed to dive into the fray with little help from previous integrations. Therefore we are creating guides for specific Wikis that make integration simple and straightforward, with guides for specific languages, and for integrating on small Wikis.
 * Integration guides

Instructions on how to integrate an article may be found here

News in short


 * To come
 * Medical editor census - Medical editors on different Wikis have been without proper means of communication. A preliminary list of projects is available here.
 * Proofreading drives


 * Further reading
 * Translators Without Borders
 * Healthcare information for all by 2015, a global campaign

Please comment on Talk:Gliese 581
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gliese 581. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Creation Museum
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Creation Museum. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=619350887 your edit] to Tellegen's theorem may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:41, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * theorems in network theory. Most of the energy distribution theorems and extremum principle s in network theory can be derived from it. It was published in 1952 by Bernard Tellegen.<ref

Inevitability thesis
Just thought that I'd let you, as a participant, know that based upon the discussion at Articles for deletion/Inevitability thesis, I have somewhat boldly turned Inevitability thesis into a disambiguation page. See also Talk:Inevitability thesis. --Bejnar (talk) 20:23, 1 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for following up on this. The disambiguation page looks fine to me. I thought that the topic should be covered somewhere on WP and Hayek looked like the best place for that. But I agree that that usage isn't necessarily dominant and disambiguation is a reasonable compromise. Thanks for creating the page and providing the references on the talk page. --Mark viking (talk) 23:16, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mensuration
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mensuration. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Historicity of Jesus
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Historicity of Jesus. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=621816080 your edit] to Carl S. Herz may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:08, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * on spectral synthesis, positive definite functions, Fourier transforms on convex sets, potential theory\\, Hp, and BMO. According to [[Nicholas

Please comment on Talk:Earthquake prediction
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Earthquake prediction. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:OpenOffice.org
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:OpenOffice.org. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Scientific opinion on climate change
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Scientific opinion on climate change. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Latrodectus
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Latrodectus. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:OpenOffice.org
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:OpenOffice.org. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of extinct mammals
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of extinct mammals. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Richard O'Dwyer
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Richard O'Dwyer. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014 Wikification Drive
This message was delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To stop receiving messages from WikiProject Wikify, remove your name from the recipients page. -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Restriction (mathematics)
Hello! I agreed with your assessment of restriction (mathematics) as a stub, and so I've been trying to get it to at least a somewhat usable level. I'd like to get it to a C level. In your opinion, what more does it need before it reaches that point? Thanks, Brirush (talk) 19:01, 10 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi ! You have already done a good job organizing the article, expanding it and adding references--beyond start and heading to C. This is sort of a limited subject, so I don't think much more would be needed for C class. A few ideas:
 * Indicate what a restriction is good for. The plot in the article demonstrates a main use: cut out the undefined/singular bits of a function to make it well behaved. In topology, the neighborhood is sometimes used as a kind of restriction. In database theory or relational algebra, a restriction in the form of a selection operator is a fundamental operation, useful for filtering and for specifying joins.
 * How do restrictions relate to other similar concepts? Clarify the difference between projection and restriction, for instance--one is a subset, the other a map to a new space. How are restriction and corestriction related?
 * Notation: some people use $$ {f|}_A$$ and some people use $$f {\restriction_A}$$. We should probably note both notations.
 * I attempted to expand and clarify the definition, please check that I didn't introduce errors or infelicities. Please take or leave these suggestions according to your good taste. Thanks, --Mark viking (talk) 21:10, 11 October 2014 (UTC)


 * There is also restriction of the range of a function. (Already mentioned.) How this works out in the smooth manifold case can be found in John M. Lee's book Introduction to Smooth Manifolds pp. 190 - 195. Restriction of tensor fields to submanifolds might be worth mention too. Willard's book General Topology lists (as problems to work out) a couple of nontrivial propositions that involve restrictions of functions. One of them is a generalization of the pasting lemma.
 * Wikipedia's rating policy is rather unrewarding to writers of short, concise and good articles. Ratings often measure length/importance of topic rater than quality. One screen articles almost never get past "Start". YohanN7 (talk) 22:18, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Seven states of randomness
See if the article is easier to understand now. Perhaps latter I will add a more technical explanation of what Mandelbrot had in mind.Lbertolotti (talk) 00:21, 14 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi - I think you have done a good job of giving the context of financial risk analysis and management for the seven states of randomness, to help establish why these ideas are important. But I'm not sure if the definition of a quant or its relation to a financial engineer is directly relevant to the subject, other than to say that these are the sorts of people who think about types randomness in their models. Regards, --Mark viking (talk) 03:13, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Well, risk management has been done for a long time without using math. Financial engineer practice is what is directly affected by Mandelbrot's work.Lbertolotti (talk) 13:10, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

February 2015 Wikification drive
Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the February drive has been started. Better late than never! Come on, sign up! :) Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 23:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Featured article candidate
Hi Mark viking,

I hope you're doing well. I just wanted to invite you to take a look at the M-theory article, which is currently a featured article candidate. You've given wonderful comments on past articles, and I'd love to hear from you again if you're interested.

Thanks,

Polytope24 (talk) 03:48, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

April 2015 Wikification drive.
Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the April drive has been started. Come on, sign up! :) One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 03:42, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Proportion
Hi, as a mathematician, could you chime in Talk:Proportion. Thanks. Mikus (talk) 17:32, 26 April 2018 (UTC)