User talk:Markanderson72

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Anagotus stephenensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  05:58, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Anagotus stephenensis
Hello and thanks for starting this excellent article! However, please consider adding an infobox to improve the article's quality, an appropriate infobox would be Template:Taxobox. If you are unfamiliar with using infoboxes, visit Help:Infobox but it's quite easy, simply copy and paste the infobox shown at the template page and fill the empty spaces. If you need additional help, visit your welcome links or contact me at my talk page. SwisterTwister  talk  06:05, 25 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello and thanks again for your contributions! When editing, I suggest using the "show preview" option located next to "save page". This will allow you to preview your contributions before submitting and prevent edit conflicts and exhausted servers. SwisterTwister   talk  18:49, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Anagotus fairburni was accepted
 Anagotus fairburni, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! j⚛e deckertalk 16:46, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.


 * Thanks! One thing you might consider is having this renamed to "Flax weevil", we usually title articles based on commonality of usage, see WP:FAUNA.  Drop me a note if you'd like me to assist with that move.  Great work!  --j⚛e deckertalk 16:55, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hadramphus spinipennis has been accepted
 Hadramphus spinipennis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Mduvekot (talk) 14:41, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Hadramphus_spinipennis help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geodorcus has been accepted
 Geodorcus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:14, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geodorcus capito has been accepted
 Geodorcus capito, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:36, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geodorcus alsobius has been accepted
 Geodorcus alsobius, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:01, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geodorcus auriculatus has been accepted
 Geodorcus auriculatus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Smmurphy(Talk) 20:09, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geodorcus ithaginis has been accepted
 Geodorcus ithaginis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  08:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geodorcus montivagus has been accepted
 Geodorcus montivagus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:35, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geodorcus novaezealandiae has been accepted
 Geodorcus novaezealandiae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! (t) Josve05a  (c) 04:15, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

A page you started (Geodorcus servandus) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Geodorcus servandus, Markanderson72!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Nice article (I'd not appreciated there were any flightless members of the Lucanidae). I certainly think this is a great candidate for WP:DYK, should you want to go the extra mile and get it on the Main page of Wikipedia. Note: The Distribution and habitat section has no references, which it definitely needs. I would wikilink Beverley Holloway as, in my view, and person who names a new species to science is notable. Not everyone agrees, but a red-link is a way to encourage someone to look at her and decide if an article is worth creating."

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 10:50, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Geodorcus servandus
Hello! Your submission of Geodorcus servandus at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:37, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geodorcus sororum has been accepted
 Geodorcus sororum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Drewmutt ( ^ᴥ^ ) talk  23:48, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Did You Know. . .    . . . that you deserve a cuppa?
Congrats on getting your first Did You Know through. I thought you deserved a cup of tea whilst you wait for it to appear on the Main Page. You'll get a message when it goes live - but it looks like it'll be in the next 48 hrs. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 13:27, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK!
Thanks Nick, really appreciate your work on the page and idea to put it forward -I had no idea about DYK! It's great to learn another little aspect of wikipedia which I will certainly use again to profile NZ invertebrates! Cheers! Markanderson72 (talk) 19:56, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Geodorcus servandus
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Dolomedes schauinslandi
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Lyperobius huttoni
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Amblyomma sphenodonti
Hello! Your submission of Amblyomma sphenodonti at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:51, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Amblyomma sphenodonti
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)