User talk:Markasaurius/sandbox

Make sure to reference your citations in a reference section below the article.

Does not flow well, make sure to clean up all the citations. Makes it way too choppy and hard to read. Too many statistics that make it confusing to read which stat goes to which piece of information and then other stats within same section from different authors sound contradicting to one another. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DonnieTrump (talk • contribs) 17:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Lahti Peer Review
There are a lot of citations listed in the actual epidemiology section, but none of them are referenced below. Also, they are referenced incorrectly. The names and dates of the authors/publishing do not need to be listed in the actual article. "An academic study found that the most common and prevalent injury was a hamstring strain" is this referring to all injuries or just orthopedic injuries, maybe make this a little more specific. "The study further explains that hamstring strains represented 15% of all injuries per club per season also had a 34% chance of recurrence" explain the study for the readers to understand what you are talking about. Readers shouldn't have to click on the reference for every sentence in order to understand the article. The sentence that follows the previously discussed sentence can be paraphrased and put into one sentence and then double referenced.

The second paragraph has a lot of information that can be shortened down to sentences like "Strong evidence supports the statement that men are more likely to be at risk of hamstring strains than women" and "old age and poor hip flexor flexibility are both strong risk factors for hamstring strains" The third paragraph can be added to the second for predisposing factors and risks. You have the population and some risk factors, but does anything else cause it or increase the risk of it.

Overall content is good, but the layout is a bit choppy and hard to follow. The information is definitely there, but needs to be organized better for better fluidity of thoughts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony Flippen (talk • contribs) 17:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review
Most common and prevalent injury in the world, workplace, or what? Make this more clear.

The statistic regarding the 15% is already stated in the article? Does it need to be listed again?

Used "However" twice in sentences close together. Maybe find a different word choice?

Think about adding a section or content on hamstring pulls in different populations other than athletes.

Overall great work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jburnsi14 (talk • contribs) 05:22, 20 November 2017 (UTC)