User talk:Markbristol

Articles for deletion nomination of Azam Marketing
I have nominated Azam Marketing, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Azam Marketing. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 22:34, 4 September 2010 (UTC)


 * See the deletion discussion for my reply to your message on my talk page. The short answer: not much help.
 * By the way, do you work for this company or its founder? You are brand new here, and all of your edits have to do with the company or its founder. I'm quite suspicious. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:23, 5 September 2010 (UTC)


 * It's not unusual for an article to be on Wikipedia for some time before an editor comes across it and the article is deemed to be possibly unsuitable. For instance, the UKHotMovies.com article had been on here for several years, but it escaped notice until the article about the parent company came up. It's also not unusual, during an article-for-deletion discussion, to discover that other related articles are also unsuitable.


 * I ask you again: Do you work for this company, either directly or indirectly? - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 20:20, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of UKHotMovies.com


A tag has been placed on UKHotMovies.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 01:49, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:10, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Again I ask you: Do you work for Azam or his companies? - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 23:12, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

"Appraise" an editor
Sir: It is obvious that you have attempted to use Wikipedia to promote a non-notable company and its personnel, in blatant violation of Wikipedia's anti-promotion policies. We have warned you about this repeatedly, and finally deleted articles related to this matter. Your attempts to intimidate me will not be received well by other administrators and editors. It is quite apparent that your goals and methods are not suitable for Wikipedia, and that you should take your efforts elsewhere. If you continue to intimidate or threaten any other editor, you will be blocked from further editing at Wikipedia. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:42, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. You just don't get it, do you? - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 01:27, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Realkyhick, you may be blocked from editing. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 01:30, 19 September 2010 (UTC)