User talk:Markelmitchell

January 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Late Registration. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please consider that making the edit to an article under different accounts (sock puppetry) can result in blocking of the user's account. --Dan56 (talk) 20:20, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to In My Own Words has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. If you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. --Dan56 (talk) 02:43, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Room for Improvement. Your edit does not adhere to WP:MOS guidelines regarding the use of boldface and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 21:38, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Your unconstructive edits to Albums articles are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you will be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -- Dan56 (talk) 02:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

WP:Albums articles
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason.


 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=|link=]] This is your last warning; You have been warned on several occasions about making unconstructive use of boldface and have refused to cooperate or comply with Wikipedia's guidelines. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
 * Hi, Markelmitchell. I see you have over 600 edits and have yet to make a talk page or user talk page edit. People are having problems with some of the edits you are doing so it is time to start talking to us about what you are doing and why. Please follow the link Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and discuss this issue. Thanks. -- Diannaa (Talk) 04:47, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi, Markelmitchell. Since I last posted a message here on your Talk page, you have performed 19 edits to various pages, and five of them have been reverted. I think you might agree that it's not fair to other editors to have to go around cleaning up after you. It's a waste of their time and yours. Please make note of the Welcome template I have placed at the top of this page. In addition to the material presented there, you might like to take note of the style guidelines at Manual of Style (music), as articles about musicians seems to be your main area of focus at present. Please remember that Wikipedia is not only the encyclopedia that anyone can edit, it's also the encyclopedia that we all edit together. Failing to follow the style guidelines and expecting other people to go around cleaning up after you will not lead to collegiate editing, and may even be considered disruptive enough that you could be blocked from editing. Please take the time to look over the links and read up before you make any more changes to the articles. Thank you. -- Diannaa (Talk) 20:36, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * You need to stop this pissing content, bro. It's not constructive. Be serious now, kid. Use those fingers of yours constructivey and type some response to this, silent one. Dan56 (talk) 23:41, 22 March 2011 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=|link=]] This is your last warning; You have been warned on several occasions about making unconstructive edits and have refused to communicate or comply with Wikipedia's guidelines. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Diannaa  (Talk) 01:05, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing and failure to communicate. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Diannaa (Talk) 01:35, 23 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I see that one of the first things you did after your block ended was to undo my edit on 51/50 Ratchet. Now you are carrying on without discussion doing the same kind of pointless edits and things that do not always meet Wikipedia style guidelines. You need to stop and explain yourself. For example, on the surface looks like a good edit, but checking back in the history I see that these links were added and removed by you on March 22. Please stop and discuss here on this talk page. Thank you. -- Diannaa  (Talk) 23:28, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * you have made a change that removes the word "co-produced" and inserts the abbreviation "co." This a bad edit because "co." is also an abbreviation used for a limited company. You are making things less clear with this edit. We do not need to abbreviate things, as the amount of space we have is infinite. Please stop making these disruptive pointless changes, as you are in danger of being blocked again. Thank you. -- Diannaa (Talk) 23:59, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Nicki Minaj discography worked, and it has been reverted or removed. However, if you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''Thanks for your edits. However, the minor styling and capitalization edits you made were not exactly appropriate. Things on the page are currently capitalized, italicized, and bolded the way they should be, so there is no need to make any changes. :)'' Yves (talk) 05:31, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

3RR
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing by your continued failure to communicate after having been previously blocked for the same issue. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. T. Canens (talk) 11:20, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Any admin may unblock without consulting me if the user agrees to communicate and discuss their edits. T. Canens (talk) 11:21, 29 March 2011 (UTC)