User talk:MarkoOhNo

Bree
You recently added some possibly dubious information to the Bree article. Apologies if my reversion is in error, but I'm quite sure it is not mentioned anywhere in Tolkien's work that the Breelanders were loggers. Do you possibly have a citation for the information? Carl Sixsmith (talk) 18:56, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

The changes weren't to Bree, but to Combe and Archet. Perhaps it's just the interpretation of the game designers, but Lord of the Rings Online: Shadows of Angmar has the Combe Logging Camp between Combe and the Chetwood. (Plus it stands to reason any settlement of wood structures that close to a large forest would have a forestry trade.) I haven't found anything to indicate there was any agriculture trade at Combe whatsoever, much less forestry aside from the logistics and the game design. I changed the wording on that sentence too as it implies that ALL citizens of Combe were farmers, which is exceedingly unlikely in any community. Also, all of the Tolkien wikis I've found indicate that Archet is actually at the Chetwood border rather than within it, and that Combe is simply near. MarkoOhNo (talk) 23:39, 23 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Ah right got you. It should really go in it's own section then to differentiate the adaptation specific information (which would improve the article as well as it would be less reliant on the primary source. Something like this...

Portrayal in Adaptations
In Lord of the Rings: Shadows of Angmar the people of Combe are loggers and blah blah blah

Thanks for the comments Carl Sixsmith (talk) 05:19, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

April 2019
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment, or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png located above the edit window.

''I know that you put your user name at the end of the post at Talk:Abby Johnson (activist), but by not using one of these methods, a timestamp was not included at the end of the message. (Actually, because of where you had inserted it, the timestamp of a weeks-earlier message ended up there.) I have added a timestamp to your message, but using the tildes would make things easier in the future!'' Nat Gertler (talk) 14:50, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

February 2021
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to CNN. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. ''CNN is very obviously not far-left. You know that. Please don't play games.'' DanielRigal (talk) 00:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:About, you may be blocked from editing. DanielRigal (talk) 00:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry if inserting TRUTH disrupted the fantasy world in which you're participating. Perhaps your time would be better spent LARPing instead of intentionally presenting misinformation as though factual and actively silencing reality? It's worth considering. Might even be more enjoyable to you. MarkoOhNo (talk) 13:22, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. –dlthewave ☎ 18:45, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  22:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Unblock (To Be Reviewed By Someone MATURE, This Time, Please)

 * Blocked after this Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1079 ANI thread. Meters (talk) 07:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Given the abusive, counter-factual, bizarre and irrelevant ranting below, I think it is time to revoke Talk page access here. Obviously, there is no realistic chance of a valid unblock request being submitted and, indeed, no sign of any understanding of why the block was required in the first place. Clearly this person fundamentally misunderstands the purpose of an encyclopaedia and presumably would be happier elsewhere. --DanielRigal (talk) 11:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

A NOOSE?? 🤦‍♂️ Okay, first, WHY would a Trump supporter take a noose with them to a Trump rally with the intension of hanging VP Pence?? I can think of a couple other groups who would. Second, the "noose" you were told had been seen couldn't have supported a Christmas stocking let alone a person. That's like claiming you'd seen an actual skeleton walking New Orleans on Mardi Gras. You saw a protest prop. Which is likely why the Trump supporters roundly ignored it outside their rally. Third, this "noose" was photographed SEVERAL blocks from the Capitol, FAR from the "insurrection" - probably by the same ANTIFA jackass who took it to Trump's rally. Now, that said, if you're SERIOUSLY a senior administrator, after only three years and lacking the sense of a high school graduate, then I'll nod to your authority and leave confirmed in the lack of integrity possessed by Wikipedia administrators. However I clearly requested to be addressed by someone with maturity and you most certainly lack that since you didn't address a single item I'd listed and focused instead on one I didn't. (But a striking example of Wikipedia's misinformation database, so I thank you for that reminder.) MarkoOhNo (talk) 09:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

One other thing, WHO was beating police officers?? That's one among MANY confirmed lies to which you're clinging. Trump supporters always back the blue, so if anyone was assaulting officers it was ANTIFA or BLM. All the video footage out there shows Trump supporters outside the building trying to ASSIST police. Other images show people in rather professional-looking tactical gear, which would be very out-of-place at a Trump rally (except among the far-right never-Trump protestors perhaps, or an FBI agent.) Night vision helmets aren't standard MAGA issue. lol The released security footage has discredited every accusation of which I'm aware. This was a NON-event. The only casualty of violence was a MAGA protestor. MarkoOhNo (talk) 09:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Still waiting for a mature administrator to respond to the facts I've displayed instead of brainwashed child editorial protestors who want only to silence data which conflicts with their narrow, nonsensical and fictitious worldview.... ...assuming there IS a grown-up still in charge somewhere at Wikipedia....? Or is this now officially an ANTIFA-owned site? MarkoOhNo (talk) 22:43, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Okay, this is really a sad reflection... is it seriously taking THIS long to locate an administrator with an ounce of maturity?? Is there really no one at Wikipedia who's still interested in fact and truth? Wow.... MarkoOhNo (talk) 01:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Based on your abuse of your talk page while blocked, and my well established reputation as a mature person, I am revoking your talk page access. Please see WP:UTRS for your options going forward. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  01:50, 11 October 2021 (UTC)