User talk:Markofdignity

Open letters software testing and reliable sources
Whatever the company, an open letter is not a reliable source, except for noting that company X, Y or Z has written such a letter. Hence I have reverted your addition. Kind regards, Kleuske (talk) 14:20, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Lil'Goodness for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lil'Goodness is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lil'Goodness until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Oaktree b (talk) 21:13, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Prebiotic (nutrition), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ... and on the article Lil'Goodness which should be deleted as purely promotional. Zefr (talk) 16:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)