User talk:Markojankovic87

Your submission at Articles for creation: Two faces of Globalization – Truth and Deceptions (April 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Two faces of Globalization – Truth and Deceptions and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Two faces of Globalization – Truth and Deceptions, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Two_faces_of_Globalization_%E2%80%93_Truth_and_Deceptions Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Two_faces_of_Globalization_%E2%80%93_Truth_and_Deceptions reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:10, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Modern Intelligence - Security Community - Utopia or Reality


A tag has been placed on Draft:Modern Intelligence - Security Community - Utopia or Reality, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 14:04, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Unblock
I have no idea why I am blocked. I published an article about an author significant to his field of study, and articles about his two books. It would be helpful if I knew the reason. Thanks in advance. --Markojankovic87 (talk) 20:32, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
 * As your block message says, you have violated WP:COI. You work for a marketing agency and appear to have been violating WP:PAID by writing about your clients. We aren't remotely interested in what marketing agencies wish to say about their clients. You'll need to address this in any future unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 21:20, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

How did you end up with that conclusion? Whoever claims that I am working for a marketing agency should prove that with any evidence. Someone can't just make something up and block another user without any consequences. That is simply against any normal human behavior. As I told you that I am not working for a marketing agency, please unblock me or submit evidence that I am working for a marketing agency. I can prove that I am not, and if it is possible, I am going to sue Wikipedia and people responsible for such discrimination. --Markojankovic87 (talk) 21:32, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
 * As you have threatened legal action, I have revoked your talk page access. Once your legal action concludes, you may use WP:UTRS to request reinstatement of talk page access. You may also use UTRS to unconditionally withdraw your legal threats. You do not need to contest any other part of your block via UTRS, they are free to simply reinstate your talk page access once your legal threat is resolved. Note that I am not the blocking admin in this case, I'm just noting why I understand you were blocked by another admin. --Yamla (talk) 21:43, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.