User talk:Markov Odometer/Archive

Conflict of interest
Hello, Markov Odometer. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 08:45, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Your masage about possible conflict of interest of mine, proves that you didn't read any of my edits or at least you don't understand any of them. Who exactly I'm promoting? Andrey Markov?!
 * I'll let myself ignore your masage, hoping to have constructive conversations with other editors on my talk page. Markov Odometer (talk) 09:03, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Is it not obvious that this editor adopted that user name only because he intended to write on that subject? If you had looked at the article and at some of the scholarly papers that it links, that would have been obvious to you. Michael Hardy (talk) 12:31, 20 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Sure, if you think one of my edits is silly, feel free to revert. In my experience, someone choosing a username the same as an article more often than not indicates they have some sort of connection or agenda outside of wikipedia, but obviously they are free to explain and clarify if they do not as has done and then we can move on. Cheers, Melcous (talk) 20:47, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * It is not about your experience but about reading and understanding the article you mark with . If you did not read it and did not understand the subject than do not add any template judging the content. Markov Odometer (talk) 02:36, 21 March 2018 (UTC)